liu.seSearch for publications in DiVA
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • oxford
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Pain sensation and injection techniques in maxillary dento-alveolar surgery procedures in children - a comparison between conventional and computerized injection techniques (The Wand (R))
Östergötlands Läns Landsting, Public Dental Health Care. University of Gothenburg, Sweden .
University of Gothenburg, Sweden; Ctr Rare Disorders, Gothenburg, Sweden; Malmö University, Sweden .
2014 (English)In: Swedish Dental Journal, ISSN 0347-9994, Vol. 38, no 2, 67-75 p.Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Local anesthesia, especially palatal injection, is often associated with fear and anxiety. The aim was to compare the sensation of pain when using palatal block technique with computerized injection technique (CIT), to conventional infiltration technique with traditional syringe in surgical procedures involving the palate. Patients referred for bilateral minor maxillary surgical treatments were randomized for traditional infiltration anesthesia on one side and palatal block anesthesia with CIT on the other side. AMSA and P-ASA approaches were used with CIT. The sensation of pain was scored by the VAS scale. Twenty-eight patients were included in the study, whereof 17 (61%) were girls. The median age was 14.8 yrs. (12.6 - 17.8). Bilateral exposure of palatal impacted canines was the most common treatment. The injection pain was significantly lower, (p = 0.009), when using the CIT injection compared to conventional injection. However, with time-consuming surgery, additional CIT analgesic solution had to be injected in the buccal gingiva when suturing, in one fourth of the cases. Patients sedated with nitrous oxide seemed to benefit less from CIT. Computerized injection techniques, including P-ASA and AMSA approaches, reduces the sensation of pain when carrying out less time-consuming palatal dental surgery, especially in non-sedated teenagers.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Swedish Dental Journal (Sveriges Tandläkarförbund) , 2014. Vol. 38, no 2, 67-75 p.
Keyword [en]
Computerized injection; pain control; maxillary surgery
National Category
Clinical Medicine
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:liu:diva-109401ISI: 000339087200002PubMedID: 25102717OAI: oai:DiVA.org:liu-109401DiVA: diva2:738016
Available from: 2014-08-15 Created: 2014-08-15 Last updated: 2017-12-05Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text

PubMed
By organisation
Public Dental Health Care
In the same journal
Swedish Dental Journal
Clinical Medicine

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

pubmed
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

pubmed
urn-nbn
Total: 78 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • oxford
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf