liu.seSearch for publications in DiVA
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • oxford
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Adverse listening conditions affect short-term memory storage and processing of speech for older adults with hearing impairment
Linköping University, Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Division of Neuroscience. Linköping University, Faculty of Health Sciences.
Linköping University, Department of Behavioural Sciences and Learning, Disability Research. Linköping University, The Swedish Institute for Disability Research. Linköping University, Faculty of Arts and Sciences.
Linköping University, Department of Behavioural Sciences and Learning, Disability Research. Linköping University, The Swedish Institute for Disability Research. Linköping University, Faculty of Arts and Sciences.
Linköping University, Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Division of Neuroscience. Linköping University, Faculty of Health Sciences.ORCID iD: 0000-0003-3350-8997
(English)Manuscript (preprint) (Other academic)
Abstract [en]

Purpose: Previous work has shown an effect of noise type on memory for intelligible speech. The aim ofthis study was to investigate the effect of background noise on memory performance of intelligible speech for older adults with hearing impairment using the Auditory Inference Span Test (AIST).

Method: Twenty participants with ages between 67 and 80 years with symmetrical hearing loss (29 to 47dB HL) performed the AIST, which requires processing of five-word sentences at three memoryload levels (MLLs) in three listening conditions: Quiet, steady-state noise (SSN), and backgroundvoices (ISTS). Individualized SNRs targeted 90% speech intelligibility. AIST performance reflects the amount of cognitive capacity occupied in listening, and consequently indicates the amount of listening effort. Working memory capacity (WMC) was assessed using the reading span test, and updating ability (UA) was assessed using the letter memory test.

Results: AIST performance decreased in background noise and with increasing MLL. It was related to UA and age but not to WMC. Response times on questions designed to probe sentence recognition increased with the addition of background noise.

Conclusions: The results demonstrate that the addition of background noise requires more cognitive resourcesto maintain speech recognition performance, leading to higher demands on the cognitive capacity,higher listening effort as measured by poorer memory performance, and longer AIST responsetimes. However, the type of background noise, SSN or ISTS, affected memory performance similarly.

Keyword [en]
Speech-in-noise, Cognition, Working memory, Updating, Hearing impairment, Listening effort, Cognitive spare capacity
National Category
Clinical Medicine Health Sciences
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:liu:diva-109680OAI: oai:DiVA.org:liu-109680DiVA: diva2:740381
Available from: 2014-08-25 Created: 2014-08-25 Last updated: 2017-11-06Bibliographically approved
In thesis
1. Assessing cognitive spare capacity as a measure of listening effort using the Auditory Inference Span Test
Open this publication in new window or tab >>Assessing cognitive spare capacity as a measure of listening effort using the Auditory Inference Span Test
2014 (English)Doctoral thesis, comprehensive summary (Other academic)
Abstract [en]

Hearing loss has a negative effect on the daily life of 10-15% of the world’s population. One of the most common ways to treat a hearing loss is to fit hearing aids which increases audibility by providing amplification. Hearing aids thus improve speech reception in quiet, but listening in noise is nevertheless often difficult and stressful. Individual differences in cognitive capacity have been shown to be linked to differences in speech recognition performance in noise. An individual’s cognitive capacity is limited and is gradually consumed by increasing demands when listening in noise. Thus, fewer cognitive resources are left to interpret and process the information conveyed by the speech. Listening effort can therefore be explained by the amount of cognitive resources occupied with speech recognition. A well fitted hearing aid improves speech reception and leads to less listening effort, therefore an objective measure of listening effort would be a useful tool in the hearing aid fitting process.

In this thesis the Auditory Inference Span Test (AIST) was developed to assess listening effort by measuring an individual’s cognitive spare capacity, the remaining cognitive resources available to interpret and encode linguistic content of incoming speech input while speech understanding takes place. The AIST is a dual-task hearing-innoise test, combining auditory and memory processing, and requires executive processing of speech at different memory load levels. The AIST was administered to young adults with normal hearing and older adults with hearing impairment. The aims were 1) to develop the AIST; 2) to investigate how different signal-to-noise ratios (SNRs) affect memory performance for perceived speech; 3) to explore if this performance would interact with cognitive capacity; 4) to test if different background noise types would interact differently with memory performance for young adults with normal hearing; and 5) to examine if these relationships would generalize to older adults with hearing impairment.

The AIST is a new test of cognitive spare capacity which uses existing speech material that is available in several countries, and manipulates simultaneously cognitive load and SNR. Thus, the design of AIST pinpoints potential interactions between auditory and cognitive factors. The main finding of this thesis was the interaction between noise type and SNR showing that decreased SNR reduced cognitive spare capacity more in speech-like noise compared to speech-shaped noise, even though speech intelligibility levels were similar between noise types. This finding applied to young adults with normal hearing but there was a similar effect for older adults with hearing impairment with the addition of background noise compared to no background noise. Task demands, MLLs, interacted with cognitive capacity, thus, individuals with less cognitive capacity were more sensitive to increased cognitive load. However, MLLs did not interact with noise type or with SNR, which shows that different memory load levels were not affected differently in different noise types or in different SNRs. This suggests that different cognitive mechanisms come into play for storage and processing of speech information in AIST and for listening to speech in noise. Thus, the results suggested that a test of cognitive spare capacity seems to be a useful way to assess listening effort, even though the AIST, in the design used in this thesis, might be too cognitively demanding to provide reliable results for all individuals.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Linköping: Linköping University Electronic Press, 2014. 66 p.
Series
Linköping University Medical Dissertations, ISSN 0345-0082 ; 1414Studies from the Swedish Institute for Disability Research, ISSN 1650-1128 ; 64
Keyword
Listening effort, Cognitive spare capacity, Speech-in-noise, Cognition, Working memory, Updating, Hearing impairment
National Category
Clinical Medicine Health Sciences
Identifiers
urn:nbn:se:liu:diva-109682 (URN)10.3384/diss.diva-109682 (DOI)978-91-7519-267-3 (ISBN)
Public defence
2014-09-19, Victoriasalen, Campus US, Linköpings universitet, Linköping, 13:00 (English)
Opponent
Supervisors
Available from: 2014-09-01 Created: 2014-08-25 Last updated: 2014-10-08Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text

Authority records BETA

Rönnberg, NiklasRudner, MaryLunner, ThomasStenfelt, Stefan

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Rönnberg, NiklasRudner, MaryLunner, ThomasStenfelt, Stefan
By organisation
Division of NeuroscienceFaculty of Health SciencesDisability ResearchThe Swedish Institute for Disability ResearchFaculty of Arts and Sciences
Clinical MedicineHealth Sciences

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

urn-nbn

Altmetric score

urn-nbn
Total: 281 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • oxford
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf