Crisis management and public health: ethical principles for priority setting at a regional level in Sweden
2015 (English)In: Public Health Ethics, ISSN 1754-9973, E-ISSN 1754-9981, Vol. 8, no 1, 72-84 p.Article in journal (Refereed) Published
In this article I analyse and discuss guidelines for priority setting in crisis management at a regional level in Sweden. The guidelines concern three types of crises: pandemics, large losses of electric power and interruptions in water supply. Pandemics are typical public health issues. Large losses of electric power and interruptions in water supply are in themselves not, but may have serious public health consequences. These guidelines are compared with guidelines for priority setting in health care. This is done because of the central position of health care in the management of many different types of crises. The comparison shows clear differences. In the analysis, I use a distinction between substantive principles of priority setting and process-oriented principles. Regarding substantive principles, I have found that the guidelines point in different directions. This seems acceptable, however, since they focus on different problems. Moreover, it seems possible to integrate the various context-dependent principles by relating them to higher order principles. Regarding process-oriented principles, I have found that how and to what extent these principles are applied in the guidelines vary. If we want to apply these principles in a more satisfying way, this would require a more systematic approach.
Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Oxford University Press, 2015. Vol. 8, no 1, 72-84 p.
IdentifiersURN: urn:nbn:se:liu:diva-110560DOI: 10.1093/phe/phu028ISI: 000352535600011OAI: oai:DiVA.org:liu-110560DiVA: diva2:746587