liu.seSearch for publications in DiVA
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • oxford
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Hooked on a feeling?: Corporeal connectedness and relationality in infertility accounts
Linköping University, Department of Thematic Studies, Technology and Social Change. Linköping University, Faculty of Arts and Sciences.
2017 (English)In: Health, ISSN 1363-4593, E-ISSN 1461-7196, 1-18 p.Article in journal (Refereed) Epub ahead of print
Abstract [en]

Sociocultural meanings accorded to infertility, and rapid developments in assisted reproductive technologies, have long been central concerns in feminist and social scientific research. However, knowledge is scarce concerning how individuals make sense of infertility when it is disclosed in adolescence, for example as the result of an ‘atypical’ sex development, rather than as a result of failed conception. This article examines how understandings of desires, kinship and ‘solutions’ take shape and are negotiated in the accounts women give of infertility resulting from ‘atypical’ sex development. Through a thematic analysis it demonstrates how the interviewees described their desire for relationships and connectedness, which they considered to be made possible through pregnant embodiment, and details how these desires connected to a preference for medical ‘solutions’. Specifically, the article discusses how the interviewees’ accounts exemplifies how biological kinship can be ‘done’ without giving precedence to genetics. By addressing the specificities of finding out about infertility as a result of ‘atypical’ sex development, it furthermore highlights gaps in the common medical definition of infertility. These findings underscore the urgency of examining how definitions of infertility obscure certain experiences and consequently limit affected individuals’ access to support and treatment. In conclusion, it is suggested that the article contributes to a more positive discourse on infertility in feminist scholarship by teasing out the temporal dimensions of how affected individuals ‘make active use’ of assisted reproductive technologies to mitigate uncertainty and maintain hope, while at the same time renegotiating dominant norms of kinship.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Sage Publications, 2017. 1-18 p.
National Category
Social Sciences Interdisciplinary Gender Studies
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:liu:diva-111099DOI: 10.1177/1363459317693403OAI: oai:DiVA.org:liu-111099DiVA: diva2:753333
Available from: 2014-10-07 Created: 2014-10-07 Last updated: 2017-12-05Bibliographically approved
In thesis
1. Ambivalent Ambiguity?: A study of how women with 'atypical' sex development make sense of female embodiment
Open this publication in new window or tab >>Ambivalent Ambiguity?: A study of how women with 'atypical' sex development make sense of female embodiment
2014 (English)Doctoral thesis, comprehensive summary (Other academic)
Alternative title[sv]
Ambivalent tvetydighet? : En studie av hur kvinnor med ”otypisk” könsutveckling skapar mening kring kvinnlig kroppslighet
Abstract [en]

Against a backdrop of feminist and social scientific research on sex, female embodiment, and normality this thesis aims to discern how young women, who in adolescence have learned that their bodies are developing in ways considered ‘atypical’ for the female sex, make sense of their bodies and their situation. In focus are the ways in which the women make sense of and negotiate female embodiment; how they, particularly in stories about their interactions with others, position their embodied selves; and how norms and beliefs about sexed embodiment, heterosexual practice, and in/fertility are strengthened and challenged in the interviewees’ sense-making. The data comprise 23 in-depth interviews with women who in adolescence have learned that they do not have a uterus and a vagina, or who have learned that they do not have two X chromosomes and have no, or non-functioning, ovaries. Through narrative and thematic analysis the thesis shows how the women’s sense-making can be obstructed by norms about female embodiment, heterosexual practice, and in/fertility, expressed through medical terminology and practice and in interaction with family, friends, and peers, as described by the interviewees. Concomitantly, as the thesis demonstrates, medical terminology can be experienced and function as a resource in the women’s sense-making. Diagnostic categories enable them to put the specificities of sex development into words and raise awareness about bodily variation. Furthermore, in their stories about others’ reactions to their bodies and about their experience and management of certain medical treatments, the women question norms about female embodiment, heterosexual practice, and in/fertility that were previously taken for granted. The complexity of the women’s sense-making is demonstrated through the ways in which the interviewees, on the one hand, align with norms about female embodiment, heterosexual practice, and in/fertility, and in which they, on the other hand, succeed in challenging the same. In this ‘juggling’ of reinforcement and resistance, the thesis argues, the women are found to expand rather than dismiss beliefs about female embodiment.  Thus, the thesis contributes with deepened knowledge about what it can be like to live with these specific conditions and with problematizations of how norms about female embodiment can be enacted and questioned.

Abstract [sv]

Mot bakgrund av feministisk och samhällsvetenskaplig forskning kring kön, kvinnlig kroppslighet och normalitet syftar avhandlingen till att undersöka hur unga kvinnor, som i tonåren fått reda på att deras kropp utvecklas på ett sätt som anses ”otypiskt” för det kvinnliga könet söker förstå och skapa mening kring sin kropp och situation. Framförallt undersöks dessa kvinnors meningsskapande, hur de i sina berättelser positionerar sig i relation till andra, och hur normer och föreställningar om kvinnlig kroppslighet, heterosexuell praktik och in/fertilitet förstås, förhandlas, stärks och ifrågasätts i berättelserna. Materialet som undersöks utgörs av 23 djupintervjuer med kvinnor som i tonåren fått reda på att de antingen inte har någon livmoder och vagina eller att de inte har två X kromosomer och inga eller  icke-fungerade äggstockar. Genom narrativa och tematiska analyser visar avhandlingen hur kvinnornas meningskapande formas av normer kring kvinnlig kroppslighet, heterosexuell praktik och in/fertilitet, då de uttrycks i kvinnornas berättelser om sin situation i möten med andra och i relation till medicinsk praktik. Samtidigt, visar avhandlingen, kan medicinsk terminologi, specifikt diagnoser, och praktik utgöra resurser i kvinnornas meningsskapande som möjliggör för dem att sätta ord på och sprida kunskap om kroppslig variation. I kvinnornas berättelser om andras reaktioner på deras kroppar och om deras erfarenhet och hantering av specifika medicinska behandlingar utmanas vidare normer som kvinnorna tidigare har tagit för givet. Genom analysen framträder således komplexiteten i kvinnornas meningskapande då de å ena sidan anammar förgivettagna normer om kvinnlig kroppslighet, heterosexuell praktik och infertilitet och å andra sidan utmanar de samma. I detta ”jonglerande” av anpassning till normer och motstånd mot desammasyns kvinnorna expandera snarare än avfärda föreställningar om kvinnlig kroppslighet. Avhandlingen fördjupar därmed kunskapen om hur det kan vara att leva med dess specifika tillstånd och till att problematisera hur normer om kvinnlig kroppslighet kan ta sig uttryck och ifrågasättas.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Linköping: Linköping University Electronic Press, 2014. 77 + 2 Appendicies p.
Series
Linköping Studies in Arts and Science, ISSN 0282-9800 ; 633Linköping Dissertations on Health and Society, ISSN 1651-1646 ; 25
Keyword
Sex, sex development, ‘atypical’ sex development, female embodiment, adolescence, women, Sweden, uterine and vaginal agenesis, Turner syndrome, intersex, DSD, qualitative methodologies, sense-making, narratives, norms, normality, heteronormativity, resistance, relations, sexual practice, diagnosis, treatment, critique, Kön, könsutveckling, kvinnlig kroppslighet, ”otypisk” könsutveckling, normalitet, tonår, kvinnor, Sverige, MRKH syndrom, uterus och vaginal agenesi, Turner syndrom, intersex, DSD, meningskapande, relationer, kvalitativ metod, narrativ, normalitet, heteronormativitet, sexuell praktik, normer, ifrågasättande, diagnos, behandling, kritik
National Category
Social Sciences Interdisciplinary Gender Studies
Identifiers
urn:nbn:se:liu:diva-111100 (URN)10.3384/diss.diva-1111100 (DOI)978-91-7519-215-4 (ISBN)
Public defence
2014-10-31, TEMCAS, Hus T, Campus Valla, Linköpings universitet, Linköping, 10:15 (English)
Opponent
Supervisors
Available from: 2014-10-07 Created: 2014-10-07 Last updated: 2016-05-04Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text

Other links

Publisher's full text

Authority records BETA

Guntram, Lisa

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Guntram, Lisa
By organisation
Technology and Social ChangeFaculty of Arts and Sciences
In the same journal
Health
Social Sciences InterdisciplinaryGender Studies

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
urn-nbn
Total: 152 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • oxford
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf