liu.seSearch for publications in DiVA
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • oxford
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Validity and reliability of Seattle angina questionnaire Japanese version in patients with coronary artery disease
University of Tokyo, Japan .
University of Tokyo, Japan .
University of Tokyo, Japan .
University of Tokyo, Japan .
Show others and affiliations
2010 (English)In: Asian Nursing Research, ISSN 1976-1317, Vol. 4, no 2, 57-63 p.Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Purpose

The aim of this study was to evaluate the validity and reliability of the Seattle Angina Questionnaire, Japanese version (SAQ-J) as a disease-specific health outcome scale in patients with coronary artery disease.

Methods

Patients with coronary artery disease were recruited from a university hospital in Tokyo. The patients completed self-administered questionnaires, and medical information was obtained from the subjects' medical records. Face validity, concurrent validity evaluated using Short Form 36 (SF-36), known group differences, internal consistency, and test-retest reliability were statistically analyzed.

Results

A total of 354 patients gave informed consent, and 331 of them responded (93.5%). The concurrent validity was mostly supported by the pattern of association between SAQ-J and SF-36. The patients without chest symptoms showed significantly higher SAQ-J scores than did the patients with chest symptoms in 4 domains. Cronbach's alpha ranged from .51 to .96, meaning that internal consistency was confirmed to a certain extent. The intraclass correlation coefficient of most domains was higher than the recommended value of 0.70. The weighted kappa ranged from .24 to .57, and it was greater than .4 for 14 of the 19 items.

Conclusions

The SAQ-J could be a valid and reliable disease-specific scale in some part for measuring health outcomes in patients with coronary artery disease, and requires cautious use.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Elsevier, 2010. Vol. 4, no 2, 57-63 p.
Keyword [en]
coronary artery disease; reliability; scale; validity
National Category
Health Sciences
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:liu:diva-111203DOI: 10.1016/S1976-1317(10)60006-0ISI: 000279738400001PubMedID: 25030946OAI: oai:DiVA.org:liu-111203DiVA: diva2:754439
Note

Funding Agencies|Japan Foundation of Cardiovascular Research

Available from: 2014-10-10 Created: 2014-10-10 Last updated: 2017-02-10Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text

Other links

Publisher's full textPubMed

Authority records BETA

Kato, Naoko

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Kato, Naoko
Health Sciences

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn
Total: 71 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • oxford
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf