liu.seSearch for publications in DiVA
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • oxford
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Knowledge Integration – Balancing Between Anarchy and Despotism
KTH, Stockholm, Sweden.
Linköping University, Department of Computer and Information Science. Linköping University, The Institute of Technology.
2008 (English)Conference paper, Published paper (Refereed)
Abstract [en]

A central issue in knowledge integration is how to achieve and maintain an optimal trade-off between differentiation and commonalization of knowledge. Too much emphasis on either side aggravates the efficiency of integration. The purpose of this paper is to make an inquiry into the trade-off problem from a particular theoretical perspective called the Activity Domain Theory. Two constructs from this theory are employed: the activity domain and the activity modalities. The activity domain frames the social fabric around actors working towards a common target, and the activity modalities are suggested as main dimensions through which humans coordinate their actions. We will utilize these constructs in analyzing a case study from ABB, a leading supplier of high-voltage equipment all over the world. Our conclusions are two-fold. First, complete commonality enforcement clashes inevitably with activity domain internal ideology. Second, management means such as images, need to be aligned with the activity modalities in order to achieve an optimal balance between anarchy, i.e., no commonality at all, and despotism, i.e., complete commonality. Based on these results, we suggest that the Activity Domain Theory may open up previously untrodden paths for theorizing about knowledge integration

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2008.
Keyword [en]
knowledge integration, trade-off between differentiation and commonalization, Activity Domain Theory, activity modalities, ABB
National Category
Information Systems, Social aspects
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:liu:diva-111352OAI: oai:DiVA.org:liu-111352DiVA: diva2:755601
Conference
R&D Management Advanced Workshop: Integrating knowledge - challenges for R&D management, Linköping, Sweden, 15-16 September 2008
Available from: 2014-10-15 Created: 2014-10-15 Last updated: 2014-10-28

Open Access in DiVA

fulltext(963 kB)102 downloads
File information
File name FULLTEXT01.pdfFile size 963 kBChecksum SHA-512
3bcae4b4ab38dfb2d2204458e7377eab923ebb491e2ffcfe068d003554f811231341fb56991f0db521cf71117582d755e9dfc4319ef7baa8ab067b023447da90
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf

Authority records BETA

Taxén, Lars

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Taxén, Lars
By organisation
Department of Computer and Information ScienceThe Institute of Technology
Information Systems, Social aspects

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
Total: 102 downloads
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

urn-nbn

Altmetric score

urn-nbn
Total: 536 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • oxford
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf