liu.seSearch for publications in DiVA
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • oxford
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Painting-91: a large scale database for computational painting categorization
Linköping University, Department of Electrical Engineering, Computer Vision. Linköping University, The Institute of Technology.
Norwegian Colour and Visual Computing Laboratory, Gjovik University College, Gjøvik, Norway.
Computer Vision Center, CS Dept. Universitat Autonoma de Barcelona, Spain.
Linköping University, Department of Electrical Engineering, Computer Vision. Linköping University, The Institute of Technology. Linköping University, Center for Medical Image Science and Visualization (CMIV).ORCID iD: 0000-0002-6096-3648
2014 (English)In: Machine Vision and Applications, ISSN 0932-8092, E-ISSN 1432-1769, Vol. 25, no 6, 1385-1397 p.Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Computer analysis of visual art, especially paintings, is an interesting cross-disciplinary research domain. Most of the research in the analysis of paintings involve medium to small range datasets with own specific settings. Interestingly, significant progress has been made in the field of object and scene recognition lately. A key factor in this success is the introduction and availability of benchmark datasets for evaluation. Surprisingly, such a benchmark setup is still missing in the area of computational painting categorization. In this work, we propose a novel large scale dataset of digital paintings. The dataset consists of paintings from 91 different painters. We further show three applications of our dataset namely: artist categorization, style classification and saliency detection. We investigate how local and global features popular in image classification perform for the tasks of artist and style categorization. For both categorization tasks, our experimental results suggest that combining multiple features significantly improves the final performance. We show that state-of-the-art computer vision methods can correctly classify 50 % of unseen paintings to its painter in a large dataset and correctly attribute its artistic style in over 60 % of the cases. Additionally, we explore the task of saliency detection on paintings and show experimental findings using state-of-the-art saliency estimation algorithms.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Springer Berlin/Heidelberg, 2014. Vol. 25, no 6, 1385-1397 p.
Keyword [en]
Painting categorization; Visual features; Image classification
National Category
Electrical Engineering, Electronic Engineering, Information Engineering Computer Vision and Robotics (Autonomous Systems)
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:liu:diva-111511DOI: 10.1007/s00138-014-0621-6ISI: 000342435400002OAI: oai:DiVA.org:liu-111511DiVA: diva2:756963
Available from: 2014-10-20 Created: 2014-10-20 Last updated: 2017-12-05Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text

Other links

Publisher's full text

Authority records BETA

Khan, Fahad ShahbazFelsberg, Michael

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Khan, Fahad ShahbazFelsberg, Michael
By organisation
Computer VisionThe Institute of TechnologyCenter for Medical Image Science and Visualization (CMIV)
In the same journal
Machine Vision and Applications
Electrical Engineering, Electronic Engineering, Information EngineeringComputer Vision and Robotics (Autonomous Systems)

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
urn-nbn
Total: 739 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • oxford
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf