liu.seSearch for publications in DiVA
Change search
ReferencesLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Guidance on priority setting in health care (GPS-Health): the inclusion of equity criteria not captured by cost-effectiveness analysis
Department of Global Public Health and Primary Care, University of Bergen, Norway.
Nijmegen International Centre for Health Systems Research and Education (NICHE), Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Centre, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Centre de Recherche du Centre Hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal (CRCHUM), Québec, Canada.
Department of Health Systems Financing, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland.
Show others and affiliations
2014 (English)In: Cost Effectiveness and Resource Allocation, ISSN 1478-7547, Vol. 12, no 18Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

This Guidance for Priority Setting in Health Care (GPS-Health), initiated by the World Health Organization, offers a comprehensive map of equity criteria that are relevant to health care priority setting and should be considered in addition to cost-effectiveness analysis. The guidance, in the form of a checklist, is especially targeted at decision makers who set priorities at national and sub-national levels, and those who interpret findings from cost-effectiveness analysis. It is also targeted at researchers conducting cost-effectiveness analysis to improve reporting of their results in the light of these other criteria. THE GUIDANCE WAS DEVELOP THROUGH A SERIES OF EXPERT CONSULTATION MEETINGS AND INVOLVED THREE STEPS: i) methods and normative concepts were identified through a systematic review; ii) the review findings were critically assessed in the expert consultation meetings which resulted in a draft checklist of normative criteria; iii) the checklist was validated though an extensive hearing process with input from a range of relevant stakeholders. The GPS-Health incorporates criteria related to the disease an intervention targets (severity of disease, capacity to benefit, and past health loss); characteristics of social groups an intervention targets (socioeconomic status, area of living, gender; race, ethnicity, religion and sexual orientation); and non-health consequences of an intervention (financial protection, economic productivity, and care for others).

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
BioMed Central, 2014. Vol. 12, no 18
Keyword [en]
Priority setting, Resource allocation, Cost-effectiveness, Equity, Population health
National Category
Health Sciences
URN: urn:nbn:se:liu:diva-111790DOI: 10.1186/1478-7547-12-18PubMedID: 25246855OAI: diva2:760317
Available from: 2014-11-03 Created: 2014-11-03 Last updated: 2014-11-13Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text

Other links

Publisher's full textPubMed

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Carlsson, Per
By organisation
Division of Health Care AnalysisFaculty of Health Sciences
In the same journal
Cost Effectiveness and Resource Allocation
Health Sciences

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

Altmetric score

Total: 272 hits
ReferencesLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link