liu.seSearch for publications in DiVA
Change search
ReferencesLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Influences of forest type and habitat structure on bird assemblagesof oak (Quercus spp.) and pine (Pinus spp.) stands in southwesternTurkey
Linköping University, Department of Physics, Chemistry and Biology, Biology. Linköping University, The Institute of Technology. (Conservation Ecology Group)
Faculty of Forestry, Süleyman Demirel University, Isparta, Turkey.
Isparta Province Forest District Directorate, Isparta, Turkey.
Linköping University, Department of Physics, Chemistry and Biology, Biology. Linköping University, The Institute of Technology. (Conservation Ecology Group)
Show others and affiliations
2015 (English)In: Forest Ecology and Management, ISSN 0378-1127, Vol. 336, 137-147 p.Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

The Mediterranean basin exhibits a multitude of forest habitats affected by former and current exploitation and management. Recent afforestation programs have resulted in an increase in the proportion of coniferous trees, while oak stands, formerly utilized for coppicing and grazing, are abandoned or converted into coniferous plantations. The loss of oak stands might negatively affect birds dependent upon broadleaved forests. Studies confirming or rejecting that statement are scarce, particularly in the eastern part of the region. Using a study area in southwestern Turkey we applied a guild-based approach to investigate how pine and oak stands across a chronosequence differ in their capacity to support forest bird assemblages. Variables describing the vegetation were sampled to characterize the stands and relate bird assemblages to stand structure. Bird abundance and species richness was positively associated with age for both stand types. Richness and diversity was highest in oak stands, while there were no differences in bird abundance between the two forest types. Pine stands supported a different bird species composition compared to oak stands of the same age. Stand age and structure, rather than forest type, held the highest explanatory powers for bird assembly structure. Primary cavity-nesters and ground-nesters were more abundant in oak stands, possibly reflecting differences in stand structure and resource distribution. To support these birds with suitable habitats, oaks stands need conservation. Management practices in pine stands should strive for increasing the amount of old trees and retain vegetation in the understory to benefit breeding birds.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Elsevier, 2015. Vol. 336, 137-147 p.
Keyword [en]
Birds, Forestry, Guilds, Management, Oak, Pine
National Category
Biological Sciences
URN: urn:nbn:se:liu:diva-111925DOI: 10.1016/j.foreco.2014.10.025ISI: 000347740000015OAI: diva2:762005
Available from: 2014-11-10 Created: 2014-11-10 Last updated: 2015-11-09Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

fulltext(2847 kB)110 downloads
File information
File name FULLTEXT01.pdfFile size 2847 kBChecksum SHA-512
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf

Other links

Publisher's full text

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Jansson, NicklasWesterberg, LarsMilberg, Per
By organisation
BiologyThe Institute of Technology
In the same journal
Forest Ecology and Management
Biological Sciences

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
Total: 110 downloads
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

Altmetric score

Total: 193 hits
ReferencesLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link