liu.seSearch for publications in DiVA
Change search
ReferencesLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
EPR dosimetry intercomparison using smart phone touch screen glass
Istituto Superiore di Sanità, Rome, Italy.
Institut de Radioprotection et de Sûreté Nucléaire, Fontenay-aux-Roses, France.
Institute of Radiation Protection, Helmholtz Zentrum München - German Research Center for Environmental Health, Neuherberg, Germany.
Dipartimento di Fisica e Chimica, Università di Palermo, Viale Delle Scienze, Palermo, Italy.
Show others and affiliations
2014 (English)In: Radiation and Environmental Biophysics, ISSN 0301-634X, E-ISSN 1432-2099, Vol. 53, no 2, 311-320 p.Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

This paper presents the results of an interlaboratory comparison of retrospective dosimetry using the electron paramagnetic resonance method. The test material used in this exercise was glass coming from the touch screens of smart phones that might be used as fortuitous dosimeters in a large-scale radiological incident. There were 13 participants to whom samples were dispatched, and 11 laboratories reported results. The participants received five calibration samples (0, 0.8, 2, 4, and 10 Gy) and four blindly irradiated samples (0, 0.9, 1.3, and 3.3 Gy). Participants were divided into two groups: for group A (formed by three participants), samples came from a homogeneous batch of glass and were stored in similar setting; for group B (formed by eight participants), samples came from different smart phones and stored in different settings of light and temperature. The calibration curves determined by the participants of group A had a small error and a critical level in the 0.37-0.40-Gy dose range, whereas the curves determined by the participants of group B were more scattered and led to a critical level in the 1.3-3.2-Gy dose range for six participants out of eight. Group A were able to assess the dose within 20 % for the lowest doses (< 1.5 Gy) and within 5 % for the highest doses. For group B, only the highest blind dose could be evaluated in a reliable way because of the high critical values involved. The results from group A are encouraging, whereas the results from group B suggest that the influence of environmental conditions and the intervariability of samples coming from different smart phones need to be further investigated. An alongside conclusion is that the protocol was easily transferred to participants making a network of laboratories in case of a mass casualty event potentially feasible.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Springer-Verlag New York, 2014. Vol. 53, no 2, 311-320 p.
Keyword [en]
EPR dosimetry, Radiological emergency, Retrospective dosimetry, Glass
National Category
Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Medical Imaging
URN: urn:nbn:se:liu:diva-111969DOI: 10.1007/s00411-014-0533-xISI: 000334998200011PubMedID: 24671362OAI: diva2:762745
Available from: 2014-11-12 Created: 2014-11-12 Last updated: 2014-11-12Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text

Other links

Publisher's full textPubMed

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Gustafsson, HåkanLund, EvaMarrale, Maurizio
By organisation
Division of Radiological SciencesFaculty of Health SciencesDepartment of Biomedical Engineering
In the same journal
Radiation and Environmental Biophysics
Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Medical Imaging

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

Altmetric score

Total: 81 hits
ReferencesLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link