liu.seSearch for publications in DiVA
Change search
ReferencesLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Long-term follow-up in optimally treated and stable heart failure patients: primary care vs. heart failure clinic. Results of the COACH-2 study
University of Groningen, Netherlands.
Linköping University, Department of Social and Welfare Studies, Division of Health, Activity and Care. Linköping University, Faculty of Health Sciences.
University of Groningen, Netherlands.
University of Medical Centre Utrecht, Netherlands.
Show others and affiliations
2014 (English)In: European Journal of Heart Failure, ISSN 1388-9842, E-ISSN 1879-0844, Vol. 16, no 11, 1241-1248 p.Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

AimsIt has been suggested that home-based heart failure (HF) management in primary care may be an alternative to clinic-based management in HF patients. However, little is known about adherence to HF guidelines and adherence to the medication regimen in these home-based programmes. The aim of the current study was to determine whether long-term follow-up and treatment in primary care is equally effective as follow-up at a specialized HF clinic in terms of guideline adherence and patient adherence, in HF patients initially managed and up-titrated to optimal treatment at a specialized HF clinic. Methods and resultsWe conducted a multicentre, randomized, controlled study in 189 HF patients (62% male, age 72 11 years), who were assigned to follow-up either in primary care (n = 97) or in a HF clinic (n = 92). After 12 months, no differences between guideline adherence, as estimated by the Guideline Adherence Indicator (GAI-3), and patient adherence, in terms of the medication possession ratio (MPR), were found between treatment groups. There was no difference in the number of deaths (n = 12 in primary care and n = 8 in the HF clinic; P = 0.48), and hospital readmissions for cardiovascular (CV) reasons were also similar. The total number of unplanned non-CV hospital readmissions, however, tended to be higher in the primary care group (n = 22) than in the HF clinic group (n = 10; P = 0.05). Conclusionsless thanp id="ejhf173-para-0003"greater thanPatients discharged after initial management in a specialized HF clinic can be discharged to primary care for long-term follow-up with regard to maintaining guideline adherence and patient adherence. However, the complexity of the HF syndrome and its associated co-morbidities requires continuous monitoring. Close collaboration between healthcare providers will be crucial in order to provide HF patients with optimal, integrated care.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Oxford University Press (OUP): Policy B / Wiley: 12 months , 2014. Vol. 16, no 11, 1241-1248 p.
Keyword [en]
Heart failure; Primary care; Disease management; Adherence
National Category
URN: urn:nbn:se:liu:diva-112816DOI: 10.1002/ejhf.173ISI: 000344621500013PubMedID: 25302753OAI: diva2:777095

Funding Agencies|Netherlands Heart Foundation (NHF) [2008B083]

Available from: 2015-01-08 Created: 2014-12-17 Last updated: 2015-09-02

Open Access in DiVA

fulltext(697 kB)66 downloads
File information
File name FULLTEXT01.pdfFile size 697 kBChecksum SHA-512
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf

Other links

Publisher's full textPubMed

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Jaarsma, Tiny
By organisation
Division of Health, Activity and CareFaculty of Health Sciences
In the same journal
European Journal of Heart Failure

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
Total: 66 downloads
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

Altmetric score

Total: 252 hits
ReferencesLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link