liu.seSearch for publications in DiVA
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • oxford
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Complex purchasing: a case study of evaluation models for long-term network capital investments
Linköping University, Department of Management and Engineering, Industrial Marketing and Industrial Economics. Linköping University, The Institute of Technology.
Linköping University, Department of Management and Engineering, Industrial Marketing and Industrial Economics. Linköping University, The Institute of Technology.
Aston Business School, UK.
2015 (English)In: International Journal of Engineering Sciences and Research Technology, ISSN 2277-9655, Vol. 4, no 1, 427-434 p.Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

This paper addresses purchasing evaluation models in the European electrical grid sector, with a particular focus on complex and long-term network capital investments. The findings are based on 49 interviews with 10 organizations (power companies, engineering firms, the regulatory body, and special interest groups). This research contributes to knowledge building in the under-researched area of evaluating value in complex long-term purchasing. The study finds that the inherent long-term nature of the investments in products and systems, and the underlying financial situation are of the utmost importance in evaluations, together with strong regulator influence. In fact, the regulatory body not only defines the willingness to pay for the end-consumers through regulations with a focus of protecting consumers from monopolists unfair/high-prices, but also defines the opportunity costs by the predefined a number of costs in the grids in terms of ‘standard-costs’. Although theoretically customer value is defined as the perception of benefits minus the sacrifices for the end-user, in this setting it is the regulatory body that defines this value on behalf of the end-user/consumer. Thus, the regulatory body plays a pivotal role defining the value, value creation and value sharing, and is therefore pivotal in the way in purchasing evaluation models are structured.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2015. Vol. 4, no 1, 427-434 p.
Keyword [en]
Purchasing; Supplier evaluation and performance mea surement; Supplier selection
National Category
Economics and Business
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:liu:diva-113299OAI: oai:DiVA.org:liu-113299DiVA: diva2:780904
Available from: 2015-01-15 Created: 2015-01-15 Last updated: 2015-11-04Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text

Other links

Link to Article

Authority records BETA

Rehme, JakobNordigården, Daniel

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Rehme, JakobNordigården, Daniel
By organisation
Industrial Marketing and Industrial EconomicsThe Institute of Technology
Economics and Business

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

urn-nbn

Altmetric score

urn-nbn
Total: 107 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • oxford
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf