liu.seSearch for publications in DiVA
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • oxford
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Relations between psychophysical measures of spatial hearing and self-reported spatial- hearing abilities
Academic Medical Center, NL-Amsterdam.
University of Southampton, UK-Southampton.
Hörzentrum Oldenburg GmbH, D- Oldenburg.
VU Medical Center, NL- Amsterdam .
Show others and affiliations
2015 (English)In: International Journal of Audiology, ISSN 1499-2027, E-ISSN 1708-8186, Vol. 54, no 3, 182-189 p.Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Objective: The aim of the present study was to investigate how well the virtual psychophysical measures of spatial hearing from the preliminary auditory profile predict self-reported spatial-hearing abilities. Design: Virtual spatial-hearings tests (conducted unaided, via headphones) and a questionnaire were administered in five centres in Germany, the Netherlands, Sweden, and the UK. Correlations and stepwise linear regression models were calculated among a group of hearing-impaired listeners. Study sample: Thirty normal-hearing listeners aged 19–39 years, and 72 hearing-impaired listeners aged 22–91 years with a broad range of hearing losses, including asymmetrical and mixed hearing losses. Results: Several significant correlations (between 0.24 and 0.54) were found between results of virtual psychophysical spatial-hearing tests and self-reported localization abilities. Stepwise linear regression analyses showed that the minimum audible angle (MAA) test was a significant predictor for self-reported localization abilities (5% extra explained variance), and the spatial speech reception threshold (SRT) benefit test for self-reported listening to speech in spatial situations (6% extra explained variance). Conclusions: The MAA test and spatial SRT benefit test are indicative measures of everyday binaural functioning. The binaural SRT benefit test was not found to predict self-reported spatial-hearing abilities. Read More: http://informahealthcare.com/doi/abs/10.3109/14992027.2014.953216

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Informa Healthcare, 2015. Vol. 54, no 3, 182-189 p.
Keyword [en]
Spatial hearing, hearing impaired, clinical tests, multi-centre study, audiological diagnosis, auditory profile
National Category
Other Health Sciences
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:liu:diva-115140DOI: 10.3109/14992027.2014.953216ISI: 000350644400005PubMedID: 25491328OAI: oai:DiVA.org:liu-115140DiVA: diva2:793957
Funder
EU, European Research Council
Available from: 2015-03-09 Created: 2015-03-09 Last updated: 2017-12-04

Open Access in DiVA

No full text

Other links

Publisher's full textPubMed

Authority records BETA

Hällgren, MathiasLarsby, Birgitta

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Hällgren, MathiasLarsby, Birgitta
By organisation
Division of Neuro and Inflammation ScienceFaculty of Medicine and Health SciencesDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology in Linköping
In the same journal
International Journal of Audiology
Other Health Sciences

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn
Total: 55 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • oxford
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf