liu.seSearch for publications in DiVA
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • oxford
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Quality of life research in endometrial cancer: what is needed to advance progress in this disease site? Methodological considerations from the Gynecologic Cancer InterGroup Symptom Benefit Working Group brainstorming session, Leiden 2012.
Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
Department of Medical Psychology and Psychotherapy, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria.
Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
Department of Clinical Oncology, Leiden UniversityMedical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands.
Show others and affiliations
2014 (English)In: International Journal of Gynecological Cancer, ISSN 1048-891X, E-ISSN 1525-1438, Vol. 24, no 9, 1686-1692 p.Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

BACKGROUND: Quality of life (QoL) in endometrial cancer (EC) is understudied. Incorporation of QoL questionnaires and patient-reported outcomes in clinical trials has been inconsistent, and the tools and interpretation of these measures are unfamiliar to most practitioners. In 2012, the Gynecologic Cancer InterGroup Symptom Benefit Working Group convened for a brainstorming collaborative session to address deficiencies and work toward improving the quality and quantity of QoL research in women with EC.

METHODS: Through literature review and international expert contributions, we compiled a comprehensive appraisal of current generic and disease site-specific QoL assessment tools, strengths and weaknesses of these measures, assessment of sexual health, statistical considerations, and an exploration of the unique array of histopathologic and clinical factors that may influence QoL outcomes in women with EC.

RESULTS: This collaborative composition is the first publication specific to EC that addresses methodology in QoL research and the components necessary to achieve high quality QoL data in clinical trials. Future recommendations regarding (1) the incorporation of patient-reported outcomes in all clinical trials in EC, (2) definition of an a priori hypothesis, (3) utilization of validated tools and consideration of new tools corresponding to new therapies or specific symptoms, (4) publication within the same time frame as clinical outcome data, and (5) attempt to correct for disease site-specific potential confounders are presented.

CONCLUSIONS: Improved understanding of methodology in QoL research and an increased undertaking of EC-specific QoL research in clinical trials are imperative if we are to improve outcomes in women with EC.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, 2014. Vol. 24, no 9, 1686-1692 p.
Keyword [en]
Quality of life, Clinical trials, Endometrial cancer, Patient-reported outcomes, Sexual health
National Category
Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Medicine
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:liu:diva-116544DOI: 10.1097/IGC.0000000000000245ISI: 000344611800027PubMedID: 25340293Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-84925936271OAI: oai:DiVA.org:liu-116544DiVA: diva2:798888
Available from: 2015-03-27 Created: 2015-03-27 Last updated: 2017-06-28Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text

Other links

Publisher's full textPubMedScopus

Authority records BETA

Åvall-Lundqvist, Elisabeth

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
McAlpine, Jessica NGreimel, ElfriedeBrotto, Lori ANout, Remy AShash, EmadÅvall-Lundqvist, ElisabethFriedlander, Michael LJoly, Florence
In the same journal
International Journal of Gynecological Cancer
Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Medicine

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn
Total: 98 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • oxford
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf