liu.seSearch for publications in DiVA
Change search
ReferencesLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Physiotherapeutic rehabilitation following lumbar total disc replacement: A retrospective study
Queensland, Australia.
Queensland, Australia.
Gold Coast, Australia.
Linköping University, Department of Medical and Health Sciences, Division of Physiotherapy. Linköping University, Faculty of Health Sciences. Gold Coast, Australia.ORCID iD: 0000-0002-4318-9216
2016 (English)In: Physiotherapy Research International, ISSN 1358-2267, E-ISSN 1471-2865, Vol. 3, 155-163 p.Article in journal (Refereed) Epub ahead of print
Abstract [en]

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE:

This study sought to answer the following questions: What are the outcomes of physiotherapy post lumbar total disc replacement (LTDR) compared with patient self-mediated rehabilitation? Is a difference in outcomes related to the number of physiotherapy sessions?

METHODS:

This is a retrospective observational study of 600 patients post TDR. Patient outcomes for self-mediated rehabilitation (Group 1), 1-3 sessions of clinic-based physiotherapy (Group 2) and ≥4 sessions of clinic-based physiotherapy (Group 3) were analysed. Outcomes measures included the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), Roland Morris Disability Questionnaire (RMQ), Short Form-36 Physical (SF-36 PCS) and Mental Subscale Components (SF-36 MCS), Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) for back and leg pain intensity. Patient's pre-operative baseline measures and post-operative follow-up measures at 3, 6, 12 and 24 months post-operatively were analysed.

RESULTS:

Oswestry Disability Index and RMQ had significantly lower scores in Group 3 compared with Group 1 at 3, 6, 12 and 24 months follow-up. Significantly lower scores for Group 2 compared with Group 1 were observed for the ODI at 3 months follow-up and for the RMQ at 3 and 6 months follow-up. Significantly lower scores were observed in Group 3 compared with Group 1 for VAS back pain at 3 months and VAS leg pain at 6 months follow-up. Significantly higher scores in Group 3 compared with Group 1 were also observed in the SF-36 PCS at 6, 12 and 24 months. Significantly higher scores in Group 2 compared with Group 1 were observed at 6 months follow up. These trends were also observed when investigating the percentage of patients with a greater 50% improvement in the outcome measure.

CONCLUSIONS:

Physiotherapy post-LTDR produces statistically significant and possibly clinically important improvements in functional disability, pain and quality of life outcomes compared with self-mediated rehabilitation. Copyright © 2015 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2016. Vol. 3, 155-163 p.
Keyword [en]
orthopaedics; outcome measures; physiotherapy; spinal surgery
National Category
Physiotherapy
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:liu:diva-117517DOI: 10.1002/pri.1630PubMedID: 25892105OAI: oai:DiVA.org:liu-117517DiVA: diva2:809010
Available from: 2015-04-30 Created: 2015-04-30 Last updated: 2016-09-23

Open Access in DiVA

No full text

Other links

Publisher's full textPubMed

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Abbott, Allan
By organisation
Division of PhysiotherapyFaculty of Health Sciences
In the same journal
Physiotherapy Research International
Physiotherapy

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

Altmetric score

Total: 106 hits
ReferencesLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link