liu.seSearch for publications in DiVA
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • oxford
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Reliability and validity of inexpensive and easily administered anthropometric clinical evaluation methods of postural asymmetry measurement in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: a systematic review
Department of Physiotherapy, Faculty of Health Science and Medicine, Bond University, Robina, Australia.
Department of Physiotherapy, Faculty of Health Science and Medicine, Bond University, Robina, Australia.
Department of Orthopaedics, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden; Department of Clinical Science, Intervention and Technology (CLINTEC), Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Linköping University, Department of Medical and Health Sciences, Division of Physiotherapy. Linköping University, Faculty of Health Sciences. Department of Physiotherapy, Karolinska University Hospital, Huddinge, Sweden.ORCID iD: 0000-0002-4318-9216
2016 (English)In: European spine journal, ISSN 0940-6719, E-ISSN 1432-0932, Vol. 25, no 2, 450-466 p.Article, review/survey (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

PURPOSE:

As accurate and reproducible measurements of spinal curvature are crucial in the examination of patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS), this systematic review aims to report on the reliability and validity of a range of inexpensive and easily administered anthropometric methods of postural asymmetry measurement in an AIS population, to inform practice in a clinical setting.

METHODS:

A systematic search of health research databases located studies assessing reliability and validity of inexpensive and easily administered anthropometric measures.

RESULTS:

Fourteen studies satisfied eligibility criteria. The methodological quality of included studies ranged from low to high. Validity studies were of moderate to high quality. In total, nine clinically applicable, inexpensive and easily administered anthropometric methods were identified, for assessing AIS curvature. All methods demonstrated high to very high inter-observer and intra-observer reliability. Reported criterion validity of the scoliometer and 2D photographs, when compared to Cobb angle assessed from radiographs, ranged from low to very high. iPhone measurements correlated well with scoliometer measurements. 2D photography results had a moderate to high correlation with 3D topography results.

CONCLUSIONS:

Overall, strong levels of evidence exist for iPhone and scoliometer measurements, with a high to very high reliability and moderate to very high validity. Moderate levels of evidence exist for scoliometer with mathematical formula and clinical examination with moderate and low validity, respectively. Limited evidence exists for aesthetic tools TRACE and AI and 2D photography. These results indicate there are accurate and reproducible anthropometric measures that are inexpensive and applicable in therapy settings to assess postural asymmetry; however, these only exist for measurement in the transverse plane, despite 3D characteristics of AIS. Further research is required into an inexpensive and easily administered method that can assess postural asymmetry in all anatomical planes.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Springer Publishing Company, 2016. Vol. 25, no 2, 450-466 p.
Keyword [en]
Reliability, Validity, Adolescent idiopathic scoliosis, Postural asymmetry, Measurement, Anthropometric
National Category
Other Medical Sciences not elsewhere specified
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:liu:diva-117518DOI: 10.1007/s00586-015-3961-7ISI: 000369013100014PubMedID: 25917824Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-84955756838OAI: oai:DiVA.org:liu-117518DiVA: diva2:809012
Available from: 2015-04-30 Created: 2015-04-30 Last updated: 2017-03-09Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text

Other links

Publisher's full textPubMedScopus

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Abbott, Allan
By organisation
Division of PhysiotherapyFaculty of Health Sciences
In the same journal
European spine journal
Other Medical Sciences not elsewhere specified

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

Altmetric score

Total: 199 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • oxford
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf