liu.seSearch for publications in DiVA
Change search
ReferencesLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
[Comparative effectiveness and safety of screening and counselling interventions conducted by non-physicians and physicians: A systematic review].
Department for Evidence-based Medicine and Clinical Epidemiology, Danube University, Krems, Austria.
Linköping University, Department of Medical and Health Sciences, Division of Community Medicine. Linköping University, Faculty of Health Sciences. Department for Evidence-based Medicine and Clinical Epidemiology, Danube University, Krems, Austria.
Department for Evidence-based Medicine and Clinical Epidemiology, Danube University, Krems, Austria.
Department for Evidence-based Medicine and Clinical Epidemiology, Danube University, Krems, Austria.
Show others and affiliations
2015 (German)In: Zeitschrift für Evidenz, Fortbildung und Qualität im Gesundheitswesen, ISSN 2212-0289, Vol. 109, no 1, 18-27 p.Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [de]

BACKGROUND: Current forecasts project a future shortage of physicians which might compromise the quality of health care if not addressed adequately by health policy decisions. One proposed measure is to shift selected tasks and responsibilities from physicians to other medical staff, a strategy that has proven successful in some areas (e. g., chronic disease management). To date, no studies have systematically and objectively assessed whether the application of a similar strategy to screening and counselling in preventive medicine compromises patients' health outcomes and experiences.

METHODS: A systematic search was conducted in MEDLINE, the Cochrane Library, CINAHL, and EMBASE (January 2000 - June 2014). We dually reviewed articles and assessed the risk of bias.

RESULTS: 3,315 citations were identified and five relevant articles located. Overall, the available evidence indicated that there were no substantial differences in benefits and harms of screening (colon cancer screening, sexual transmitted diseases, and mammography) and counselling (genetic breast cancer risk) between non-physicians and physicians. The quality of evidence, however, is very low for most comparisons. Reported statistically significant differences for some outcomes need to be viewed cautiously.

CONCLUSION: Shifting tasks from physicians to other medical staff for screening and counselling could be a viable strategy to address the shortage of practicing physicians. Adequate training by a physician, however, is a prerequisite for the safe and beneficial screening and counselling conducted by non-physicians.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2015. Vol. 109, no 1, 18-27 p.
National Category
Health Care Service and Management, Health Policy and Services and Health Economy
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:liu:diva-117607DOI: 10.1016/j.zefq.2014.11.001PubMedID: 25839362OAI: oai:DiVA.org:liu-117607DiVA: diva2:810003
Available from: 2015-05-06 Created: 2015-05-06 Last updated: 2015-05-18

Open Access in DiVA

No full text

Other links

Publisher's full textPubMed

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Reichenpfader, Ursula
By organisation
Division of Community MedicineFaculty of Health Sciences
Health Care Service and Management, Health Policy and Services and Health Economy

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

Altmetric score

Total: 49 hits
ReferencesLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link