liu.seSearch for publications in DiVA
Change search
ReferencesLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Varying Use of Conceptual Metaphors across Levels of Expertise in Thermodynamics
Linköping University, Department of Social and Welfare Studies, Learning, Aesthetics, Natural science. Linköping University, Faculty of Arts and Sciences.
Uppsala University, Sweden.
Amer University of Beirut, Lebanon.
2015 (English)In: International Journal of Science Education, ISSN 0950-0693, E-ISSN 1464-5289, Vol. 37, no 5-6, 780-805 p.Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Many studies have previously focused on how people with different levels of expertise solve physics problems. In early work, focus was on characterising differences between experts and novices and a key finding was the central role that propositionally expressed principles and laws play in expert, but not novice, problem-solving. A more recent line of research has focused on characterising continuity between experts and novices at the level of non-propositional knowledge structures and processes such as image-schemas, imagistic simulation and analogical reasoning. This study contributes to an emerging literature addressing the coordination of both propositional and non-propositional knowledge structures and processes in the development of expertise. Specifically, in this paper, we compare problem-solving across two levels of expertise-undergraduate students of chemistry and Ph.D. students in physical chemistry-identifying differences in how conceptual metaphors (CMs) are used (or not) to coordinate propositional and non-propositional knowledge structures in the context of solving problems on entropy. It is hypothesised that the acquisition of expertise involves learning to coordinate the use of CMs to interpret propositional (linguistic and mathematical) knowledge and apply it to specific problem situations. Moreover, we suggest that with increasing expertise, the use of CMs involves a greater degree of subjective engagement with physical entities and processes. Implications for research on learning and instructional practice are discussed.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Taylor andamp; Francis (Routledge): SSH Titles , 2015. Vol. 37, no 5-6, 780-805 p.
Keyword [en]
Conceptual metaphor; Problem-solving; Thermodynamics; Expertise
National Category
Educational Sciences
URN: urn:nbn:se:liu:diva-118248DOI: 10.1080/09500693.2015.1025247ISI: 000354124100003OAI: diva2:813537
Available from: 2015-05-22 Created: 2015-05-22 Last updated: 2015-06-11

Open Access in DiVA

fulltext(650 kB)0 downloads
File information
File name FULLTEXT01.pdfFile size 650 kBChecksum SHA-512
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf

Other links

Publisher's full text

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Jeppsson, Fredrik
By organisation
Learning, Aesthetics, Natural scienceFaculty of Arts and Sciences
In the same journal
International Journal of Science Education
Educational Sciences

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

Altmetric score

Total: 35 hits
ReferencesLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link