Moving on in life after intensive care - partners' experience of group communication
2015 (English)In: Nursing in Critical Care, ISSN 1362-1017, E-ISSN 1478-5153, Vol. 20, no 5, 256-263 p.Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Background:Partners have a burdensome time during and after their partners’ intensive care period. They may appear to be coping welloutwardly but inside feel vulnerable and lost. Evaluated interventions for partners on this aspect are limited.
Aim:The aim of this study was to describe the experience of participating in group communication with other partners of former intensivecare patients.
Design:The study has a descriptive intervention-based design where group communication for partners of former, surviving intensive careunit (ICU) patients was evaluated.
Methods:A strategic selection was made of adult partners to former adult intensive care patients (n=15), 5 men and 10 women, aged37–89 years. Two group communication sessions lasting 2 h were held at monthly intervals with three to ﬁve partners. The partners later wrote,in a notebook, about their feelings of participating in group communications. To deepen the understanding of the impact of the sessions, six ofthe partners were interviewed. Content analysis was used to analyse the notebooks and the interviews.
Findings:Three categories were identiﬁed: (1) Emotional impact, the partners felt togetherness and experienced worries and gratitude, (2)Conﬁrmation, consciousness through insight and reﬂection and (3) The meeting design, group constellation and recommendation to participatein group communication.
Conclusion:Partners of an intensive care patient are on a journey, constantly trying to adapt to the new situation and ﬁnd new strategiesto ever-changing circumstances. Group communications contributed to togetherness and conﬁrmation. To share experiences with others is oneway for partners to be able to move forward in life.
Relevance to clinical practice:Group communication with other patients’ partners eases the process of going through the burden ofbeing a partner to an intensive care patient. Group communications needs to be further developed and evaluated to obtain consensus andevidence for the best practice.
Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Wiley-Blackwell, 2015. Vol. 20, no 5, 256-263 p.
Communication, content analysis, intensive care, nursing, partners
IdentifiersURN: urn:nbn:se:liu:diva-119295DOI: 10.1111/nicc.12192ISI: 000359901900006PubMedID: 26032101OAI: oai:DiVA.org:liu-119295DiVA: diva2:820696