liu.seSearch for publications in DiVA
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • oxford
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Solutions for sustained expertise in project-based organizations : Organizing for disciplinary leadership or disciplinary community
Linköping University, Department of Management and Engineering, Business Administration. Linköping University, Faculty of Arts and Sciences. (KITE)ORCID iD: 0000-0002-2918-2341
Linköping University, Department of Management and Engineering, Business Administration. Linköping University, Faculty of Arts and Sciences. (KITE)
2015 (English)Conference paper, Oral presentation only (Refereed)
Abstract [en]

A prerequisite for effective knowledge integration is access to differentiated and specialized knowledge bases. Knowledge integration often takes place in interdisciplinary project teams, where members spend most of their time working closely with members of opposing disciplinary domains in problem-solving processes. The disciplinary knowledge of individual team members is therefore key to the quality and outcome of the knowledge integration in organizations relying on interdisciplinary project work. This paper returns to a challenge well-described in previous research into project-based organizing, namely how to sustain and develop disciplinary expertise in the long run in an organization that promotes dispersal of disciplinary peers and an increased cross-learning across disciplines. So far, only a few studies have contributed to developing insights into how these challenges can be met, and how different organizational solutions might counteract the risks of losing disciplinary depth. Based on a comparative study of three cases, this study sets out to identify and analyze solutions that emerge in project-based organizations as a response to the challenge of sustaining and developing disciplinary expertise. The paper centers on structural solutions, and identifies two main types of expert structures that in different ways support disciplinary expertise: Expert structures for disciplinary leadership or for disciplinary community. These two types are further analyzed in relation to how they support disciplinary expertise.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2015.
National Category
Business Administration
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:liu:diva-120552OAI: oai:DiVA.org:liu-120552DiVA: diva2:846231
Conference
IRNOP Conference, London
Available from: 2015-08-14 Created: 2015-08-14 Last updated: 2015-09-14Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

fulltext(112 kB)187 downloads
File information
File name FULLTEXT01.pdfFile size 112 kBChecksum SHA-512
a087469460d706b3e9642f094f0b7402cef43c8beebdece5a835daa6b3efe5628d0af08739d1e02ce493b3e987d2fde15eb05737da7e75ee2f3dc8fb19d862a4
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf

Authority records BETA

Bredin, KarinEnberg, Cecilia

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Bredin, KarinEnberg, Cecilia
By organisation
Business AdministrationFaculty of Arts and Sciences
Business Administration

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
Total: 187 downloads
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

urn-nbn

Altmetric score

urn-nbn
Total: 234 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • oxford
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf