liu.seSearch for publications in DiVA
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • oxford
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
An empirical study of patient participation in guideline development: exploring the potential for articulating patient knowledge in evidence-based epistemic settings
Erasmus University Rotterdam.
Erasmus University Rotterdam.ORCID iD: 0000-0003-3008-1297
2015 (English)In: Health Expectations, ISSN 1369-6513, E-ISSN 1369-7625, Vol. 18, no 5, 942-955 p.Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Background Patient participation on both the individual and the collective level attracts broad attention from policy makers and researchers. Participation is expected to make decision making more democratic and increase the quality of decisions, but empirical evidence for this remains wanting.

Objective To study why problems arise in participation practice and to think critically about the consequence for future participation practices. We contribute to this discussion by looking at patient participation in guideline development.

Methods Dutch guidelines (n = 62) were analysed extended version of the AGREE instrument. In addition, semi-structured interviews were conducted with actors involved in guideline development (n = 25).

Results The guidelines analysed generally scored low on the item of patient participation. The interviews provided us with important information on why this is the case. Although some respondents point out the added value of participation, many report on difficulties in the participation practice. Patient experiences sit uncomfortably with the EBM structure of guideline development. Moreover, patients who develop epistemic credibility needed to participate in evidence-based guideline development lose credibility as representatives for ‘true’ patients.

Discussion and conclusions We conclude that other options may increase the quality of care for patients by paying attention to their (individual) experiences. It will mean that patients are not present at every decision-making table in health care, which may produce a more elegant version of democratic patienthood; a version that neither produces tokenistic practices of direct participation nor that denies patients the chance to contribute to matters where this may be truly meaningful. 

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
John Wiley & Sons, 2015. Vol. 18, no 5, 942-955 p.
Keyword [en]
guideline development, patient participation, patient-centered care
National Category
Health Care Service and Management, Health Policy and Services and Health Economy
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:liu:diva-122262DOI: 10.1111/hex.12067ISI: 000365046700027PubMedID: 23634973OAI: oai:DiVA.org:liu-122262DiVA: diva2:864304
Available from: 2015-10-26 Created: 2015-10-26 Last updated: 2017-09-11

Open Access in DiVA

fulltext(461 kB)129 downloads
File information
File name FULLTEXT01.pdfFile size 461 kBChecksum SHA-512
741b2ce309884f48e07678523f62b844405b97235a8d6347489a0d03360a52c280dd0a785465f904479efd8164f84f8273c7d7b44c4ebbeae20094cbd5f882c4
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf

Other links

Publisher's full textPubMed

Authority records BETA

Zuiderent-Jerak, Teun

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Zuiderent-Jerak, Teun
In the same journal
Health Expectations
Health Care Service and Management, Health Policy and Services and Health Economy

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
Total: 129 downloads
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn
Total: 91 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • oxford
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf