liu.seSearch for publications in DiVA
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • oxford
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Utvärdering av kuratorers uppfattning om metoden "Förändrande familjesamtal".
Linköping University, Department for Studies of Social Change and Culture. Linköping University, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences.
2014 (Swedish)Independent thesis Advanced level (professional degree), 10 credits / 15 HE creditsStudent thesis
Abstract [sv]

Syftet med den aktuella studien var att beskriva kuratorerna inom Barn och Ungdomsenheterna (socialtjänsten i Örebro) uppfattning av Magnus Ringborgs modell Förändrande familjesamtal, FFS och hur användbar de upplever den vara.

Sjutton av behandlingsenheternas tjugofem kuratorer deltog i utvärderingen. Kuratorerna intervjuades utifrån ett intervjuformulär med fasta frågor och möjlighet till kommentarer. Fokus för utvärderingen var metodens olika moment och hur viktiga dessa bedömts vara av kuratorerna. Därefter ställdes generella frågor om metodens användbarhet och effektivitet.

De flesta kuratorer var positiva till metoden FFS. De ansåg att metoden var lättanvänd, underlättade familjearbetet, gav struktur och effektiviserade behandlingsarbetet. Dock uppfattade en del av kuratorer att metoden hade begränsad användbarhet i resurssvaga och omotiverade familjer.

Abstract [en]

The aim of the present study was to describe the professional counselors, in Children and Youth Units at Social services in Örebro, opinion on Magnus Ringborgs model Therapeutic family conversations (FFS), and how useful they perceive it to be.

Seventeen of the Children and Youth Units twenty-five counselors participated in the evaluation. The counselors were interviewed based on an interview form with pre-defined questions and had opportunity to comment. The focus of the evaluation was the various steps of the method and how important the counselors considered them to be. They were then asked general questions about the method´s usefulness and effectiveness.

Most counselors had a positive approach to FFS. They considered the method to be easy to apply, facilitated family work, gave structure and streamlined the processing work. Some of the counselors did however perceive the method to have limited use in resource poor- and unmotivated families.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2014. , 26 p.
Keyword [sv]
förändrande familjesamtal, metod, kuratorer, utvärdering
Keyword [no]
therapeutic family conversations, method, social workers, evaluation
National Category
Medical and Health Sciences
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:liu:diva-123415OAI: oai:DiVA.org:liu-123415DiVA: diva2:882945
Subject / course
Postgraduate education in systemic family therapy
Available from: 2015-12-16 Created: 2015-12-16 Last updated: 2015-12-16Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

fulltext(464 kB)112 downloads
File information
File name FULLTEXT01.pdfFile size 464 kBChecksum SHA-512
47e6a45b1119ca34a880981db7d5b6429aad3736dbf43e8a14d95c28e3e9c58a8d4981d28b6b05e7c80a9690cc1f2212280f1a30bc987111237750093454c7eb
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf

By organisation
Department for Studies of Social Change and CultureFaculty of Medicine and Health Sciences
Medical and Health Sciences

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
Total: 112 downloads
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

urn-nbn

Altmetric score

urn-nbn
Total: 190 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • oxford
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf