2016 (English)In: Environmental Science and Policy, ISSN 1462-9011, E-ISSN 1873-6416, Vol. 55, no 1, 135-140 p.Article in journal (Refereed) Published
As experiences of implementation of climate change adaptation are accumulating, there is a need toincrease the understanding of the potential negative consequences of adaptation actions that mightoccur, and the capacity of research to assess them. Maladaptation used in this context has remainedelusively defined and sparingly used, and therefore difficult to apply. Based on a literature review, wediscuss the conceptual boundaries of maladaptation and how it can be used to analyse negativeoutcomes of adaptation and propose a refined definition. We present a typology of maladaptation thatdistinguishes between three types of maladaptive outcomes – rebounding vulnerability, shiftingvulnerability and eroding sustainable development, and argue that maladaptation can be defined as a resultof an intentional adaptation policy or measure directly increasing vulnerability for the targeted and/orexternal actor(s), and/or eroding preconditions for sustainable development by indirectly increasing society’svulnerability. We note that the recognition of adaptation as an intentional action and the importance ofsetting clear spatial and temporal boundaries, as well as thresholds, are key to analysing negativeoutcomes.
Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Elsevier, 2016. Vol. 55, no 1, 135-140 p.
Climate change Adaptation, Maladaptation, Vulnerability, Feedbacks
Other Social Sciences not elsewhere specified
IdentifiersURN: urn:nbn:se:liu:diva-124351DOI: 10.1016/j.envsci.2015.09.014OAI: oai:DiVA.org:liu-124351DiVA: diva2:898032