liu.seSearch for publications in DiVA
Change search
ReferencesLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Keeping open by re-imagining laughter and fear
Linköping University, The Tema Institute, Technology and Social Change. Linköping University, Faculty of Arts and Sciences.
2015 (English)In: Sociological Review, ISSN 0038-0261, E-ISSN 1467-954X, Vol. 63, no 4, 897-921 p.Article in journal (Refereed) PublishedText
Abstract [en]

Speaking to the debate on the nature of critique, this article is about the struggle to produce an account when listening to and retelling stories. It begins with the disconcertment over listening to a coherent story that emerges in interviews about the development of performance indicators for Dutch hospital care. The indicators are presented as solutions to the problem of unruliness in the healthcare world. Drawing on Helen Verrans work on generative critique I slow down the problem-solution-found plot. Instead of contrasting the apparently coherent stories with the complexities of an underlying practice of healthcare, I hold on to my initial disconcertment so that fleetingly subtle interruptions become entry points for generative critique. Taking Eduardo Viveiros de Castros understanding of the relation that fear and laughter have to alterity, I show how fear and laughter permit generative critique within seemingly coherent stories. In the case of indicator development, the interviewees laugh away what they consider alter from quality and safety in healthcare: having no control over what is going on, polyglotism instead of a common language, and inaction as opposed to taking ones time. Paying attention to disconcerting interruptions generates sensitivity and questions rather than yet another set of (critical) problem-solution-found answers. How can ridiculed (laughed away) subjectivity be acknowledged as important entry points for including alterity in supervision? And how to position the acknowledgement, not as an antidote, but as a way of rendering the fear of alterity generative? Nurturing sensitivities is crucial for keeping open, which means resisting both the sticky tendency of normalizing accounts and the fallacy of misplaced concreteness. I conclude that keeping open by re-imagining critique resonates with the creativity of collective life in actual times and places. Thereby it offers a promising potential for doing worlds differently.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
WILEY-BLACKWELL , 2015. Vol. 63, no 4, 897-921 p.
Keyword [en]
alterity; generative critique; idiotic murmuring; matters of care; misplaced concreteness; nurturing disconcertment
National Category
Other Social Sciences
URN: urn:nbn:se:liu:diva-124653DOI: 10.1111/1467-954X.12221ISI: 000368329500008OAI: diva2:901573

Funding Agencies|UK Economic & Social Research Council [RES-166-25-0051]

Available from: 2016-02-08 Created: 2016-02-08 Last updated: 2016-02-08

Open Access in DiVA

No full text

Other links

Publisher's full text

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Jerak-Zuiderent, Sonja
By organisation
Technology and Social ChangeFaculty of Arts and Sciences
In the same journal
Sociological Review
Other Social Sciences

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

Altmetric score

Total: 162 hits
ReferencesLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link