liu.seSearch for publications in DiVA
Change search
ReferencesLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
A randomized study of KRAS-guided maintenance therapy with bevacizumab, erlotinib or metronomic capecitabine after first-line induction treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer: the Nordic ACT2 trial
County Hospital Ryhov, Sweden.
Karolinska University Hospital, Sweden.
University of Uppsala Hospital, Sweden.
Skåne University Hospital, Sweden.
Show others and affiliations
2016 (English)In: Annals of Oncology, ISSN 0923-7534, E-ISSN 1569-8041, Vol. 27, no 1, 140-147 p.Article in journal (Refereed) PublishedText
Abstract [en]

Maintenance treatment (mt) with bevacizumab (bev) +/- erlotinib (erlo) has modest effect after induction chemotherapy in metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). We hypothesized the efficacy of erlo to be dependent on KRAS mutational status and investigated this by exploring mt strategies with bev +/- erlo and low-dose capecitabine (cap). Included patients had mCRC scheduled for first-line therapy, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) 0-1 and no major comorbidities. Treatment with XELOX/FOLFOX or XELIRI/FOLFIRI + bev was given for 18 weeks. After induction, patients without progression were eligible for randomization to mt; KRAS wild-type (wt) patients were randomized to bev +/- erlo (arms wt-BE, N = 36 versus wt-B, N = 35), KRAS mutated (mut) patients were randomized to bev or metronomic cap (arms mut-B, N = 34 versus mut-C, N = 33). Primary end point was progression-free survival (PFS) rate (PFSr) at 3 months after start of mt. A pooled analysis of KRAS wt patients from the previous ACT study was performed. We included 233 patients. Median age was 64 years, 62% male, 68% ECOG 0, 52% with primary tumor in situ. A total of 138 patients started mt after randomization. PFSr was 64.7% versus 63.6% in wt-B versus wt-BE, P = 1.000; and 75% versus 66.7% in mut-B versus mut-C, P = 0.579, with no significant difference in median PFS and overall survival (OS). In the pooled cohort, median PFS was 3.7 months in wt-B (N = 64) and 5.7 months in wt-BE (N = 62) (hazard ratios 1.03, 95% confidence interval 0.70-1.50, P = 0.867). The frequency of any grade 3/4 toxicities during mt was: 28%/58%/18%/15% (wt-B/wt-BE/mut-B/mut-C). Addition of erlo to bev as mt in KRAS wt mCRC did not significantly improve PFS or OS, but it did increase toxicity. KRAS status does not seem to influence the outcome of treatment with erlotinib. Metronomic cap warrants further investigation in mt strategies, given our explorative results. NCT01229813.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
OXFORD UNIV PRESS , 2016. Vol. 27, no 1, 140-147 p.
Keyword [en]
metastatic colorectal cancer; maintenance treatment; bevacizumab; erlotinib; capecitabine; metronomic chemotherapy
National Category
Clinical Medicine
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:liu:diva-124635DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mdv490ISI: 000368354600016PubMedID: 26483047OAI: oai:DiVA.org:liu-124635DiVA: diva2:901753
Available from: 2016-02-09 Created: 2016-02-08 Last updated: 2016-02-09

Open Access in DiVA

No full text

Other links

Publisher's full textPubMed

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Albertsson, Maria
By organisation
Division of Clinical SciencesFaculty of Health SciencesDepartment of Oncology
In the same journal
Annals of Oncology
Clinical Medicine

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

Altmetric score

Total: 141 hits
ReferencesLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link