liu.seSearch for publications in DiVA
Change search
ReferencesLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Welfare states do not crowd out the family: Evidence for mixed responsibility from comparative analyses
Deutsches Zentrum fuer Altersfragen [German Centre of Gerontology], Berlin.ORCID iD: 0000-0001-8697-1876
Deutsches Zentrum fuer Altersfragen [German Centre of Gerontology], Berlin.
Deutsches Zentrum fuer Altersfragen [German Centre of Gerontology], Berlin.
2005 (English)In: Ageing & Society, ISSN 0144-686X, E-ISSN 1469-1779, Vol. 25, no 6, 863-882 p.Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

This paper discusses the informal and formal provision of help and support to older people from a comparative welfare state perspective, with particular reference to the relationships between inter-generational family help and welfare state support. While the ‘substitution’ hypothesis states that the generous provision of welfare state services in support of older people ‘crowds out’ family help, the ‘encouragement’ hypothesis predicts a stimulation of family help, and the ‘mixed responsibility’ hypothesis predicts a combination of family and formal help and support. The paper reports findings from the Old Age and Autonomy: The Role of Service Systems and Inter-generational Family Solidarity (OASIS) research project. This created a unique age-stratified sample of 6,106 people aged 25–102 years from the urban populations of Norway, England, Germany, Spain and Israel. The analyses show that the total quantity of help received by older people is greater in welfare states with a strong infrastructure of formal services. Moreover, when measures of the social structure, support preferences and familial opportunity structures were controlled, no evidence of a substantial ‘crowding out’ of family help was found. The results support the hypothesis of ‘mixed responsibility’, and suggest that in societies with well-developed service infrastructures, help from families and welfare state services act accumulatively, but that in familistic welfare regimes, similar combinations do not occur.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Cambridge University Press, 2005. Vol. 25, no 6, 863-882 p.
Keyword [en]
Agieng, transfers, Gerontology, Generations, Inequality
National Category
Sociology (excluding Social Work, Social Psychology and Social Anthropology) Other Social Sciences not elsewhere specified
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:liu:diva-125876DOI: 10.1017/S0144686X05003971OAI: oai:DiVA.org:liu-125876DiVA: diva2:909341
Available from: 2016-03-06 Created: 2016-03-06 Last updated: 2016-03-17Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text

Other links

Publisher's full text

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Motel-Klingebiel, Andreas
In the same journal
Ageing & Society
Sociology (excluding Social Work, Social Psychology and Social Anthropology)Other Social Sciences not elsewhere specified

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

Altmetric score

Total: 635 hits
ReferencesLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link