liu.seSearch for publications in DiVA
Change search
ReferencesLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Danish Reading Span data from 283 hearing-aid users, including a sub-group analysis of their relationship to speech-in-noise performance
Linköping University, Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Technical Audiology. Eriksholm Research Centre, Snekkersten, Denmark,.
Linköping University, Department of Behavioural Sciences and Learning, Disability Research. Linköping University, Faculty of Arts and Sciences. Linköping University, Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Technical Audiology. Eriksholm Research Centre, Snekkersten, Denmark,.
University of Cambridge, Centre for the Neural Basis of Hearing.
Eriksholm Research Centre, Snekkersten, Denmark,.
2016 (English)In: International Journal of Audiology, ISSN 1499-2027, E-ISSN 1708-8186, Vol. 55, no 4, 254-261 p.Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Objective: This study provides descriptive statistics of the Danish reading span (RS) test for hearing-impaired adults. The combined effect of hearing loss, RS score, and age on speech-in-noise performance in different spatial settings was evaluated in a subset of participants. Design: Data from published and unpublished studies were re-analysed. Data regarding speech-in-noise performance with co-located or spatially separated sound sources were available for a subset of participants. Study sample: RS scores from 283 hearing-impaired participants were extracted from past studies, and 239 of these participants had completed a speech-in-noise test. Results: RS scores (mean = 41.91%, standard deviation = 11.29%) were related to age (p <0.01), but not pure-tone average (PTA) (p = 0.29). Speech-in-noise performance for co-located sound sources was related to PTA and RS score (both p < 0.01, adjusted R-squared = 0.226). Performance for spatially separated sounds was related to PTA (p < 0.01, adjusted R-squared = 0.10) but not RS score (p = 0.484). We found no differences between the standardized coefficients of the two regression models. Conclusions: The distribution of RS scores indicated a high test difficulty. We found that age should be controlled when RS scores are compared across populations. The experimental setup of the speech-in-noise test may influence the relationship between performance and RS score.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Taylor & Francis, 2016. Vol. 55, no 4, 254-261 p.
Keyword [en]
Reading span; hearing impairment; spatially distributed vs. co-located sound sources; speech-in-noise; working memory
National Category
Otorhinolaryngology
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:liu:diva-126496DOI: 10.3109/14992027.2015.1125533ISI: 000371744400008PubMedID: 26836955OAI: oai:DiVA.org:liu-126496DiVA: diva2:915214
Available from: 2016-03-29 Created: 2016-03-29 Last updated: 2016-04-13

Open Access in DiVA

No full text

Other links

Publisher's full textPubMed

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Borch Petersen, ElineLunner, Thomas
By organisation
Technical AudiologyDisability ResearchFaculty of Arts and Sciences
In the same journal
International Journal of Audiology
Otorhinolaryngology

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

Altmetric score

Total: 301 hits
ReferencesLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link