liu.seSearch for publications in DiVA
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • oxford
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
An exploratory study of a low-level shared awareness measure using mission-critical locations during an emergency exercise
Linköping University, Department of Computer and Information Science, Human-Centered systems. Linköping University, Faculty of Science & Engineering.ORCID iD: 0000-0001-5943-0679
Linköping University, Department of Computer and Information Science, Human-Centered systems. Linköping University, Faculty of Science & Engineering.
Linköping University, Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Division of Clinical Sciences. Linköping University, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences. Östergötlands Läns Landsting, Center for Disaster Medicine and Traumatology, Centre for Teaching and Research in Disaster Medicine and Traumatology.
Linköping University.
Show others and affiliations
2015 (English)In: Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 59th Annual Meeting, Sage Publications, 2015, Vol. 59, no 1, 1152-1156 p.Conference paper, Published paper (Refereed)
Resource type
Text
Abstract [en]

A shared awareness of other teams’ roles and tasks has been linked to successful performance in joint ventures. However, emergency management organizations responding to incidents do not always share critical information necessary for maintaining shared awareness. An instrument called Shared Priorities has previously been applied to measure aspects of shared situation awareness at level 2 and 3 in Endsley’s (1995) model. This paper reports on a shared awareness instrument focused on level 1 situation awareness and its associated level of team shared awareness. Participants in a large emergency response exercise were asked to locate and rank geographical locations based on importance for overall mission success. The results show that organizations tended to rank locations relevant for their own work higher than positions relevant to other organization’s tasks. The different organizations displayed different levels of inter-rater agreement within themselves concerning the ranking of these positions.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Sage Publications, 2015. Vol. 59, no 1, 1152-1156 p.
Series
Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting, ISSN 1541-9312 ; 59
National Category
Business Administration Information Systems, Social aspects
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:liu:diva-126629DOI: 10.1177/1541931215591178OAI: oai:DiVA.org:liu-126629DiVA: diva2:915957
Conference
Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 59th Annual Meeting
Available from: 2016-03-31 Created: 2016-03-31 Last updated: 2016-04-19Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text

Other links

Publisher's full text

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Prytz, Erik G.Rybing, JonasJonson, Carl-OscarJohansson, Björn
By organisation
Human-Centered systemsFaculty of Science & EngineeringDivision of Clinical SciencesFaculty of Medicine and Health SciencesCentre for Teaching and Research in Disaster Medicine and TraumatologyLinköping University
Business AdministrationInformation Systems, Social aspects

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

Altmetric score

Total: 124 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • oxford
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf