liu.seSearch for publications in DiVA
Change search
ReferencesLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
The transformational potential of Nationally Appropriate Mitigation Actions in Tanzania: assessing the concept’s cultural legitimacy among stakeholders in the solar energy sector
Linköping University, The Tema Institute, Tema Environmental Change. Linköping University, The Tema Institute, Centre for Climate Science and Policy Research . Linköping University, Faculty of Arts and Sciences. Independent Climate Researcher, Dar es Salaam, Tanzania.
Linköping University, The Tema Institute, Tema Environmental Change. Linköping University, Faculty of Arts and Sciences. Linköping University, The Tema Institute, Centre for Climate Science and Policy Research .ORCID iD: 0000-0002-1912-5538
NewClimate Institute, Germany.
NewClimate Institute, Germany.
Show others and affiliations
2016 (English)In: Local Environment: the International Journal of Justice and Sustainability, ISSN 1354-9839, E-ISSN 1469-6711, 1-20 p.Article in journal (Refereed) Epub ahead of print
Abstract [en]

While energy-sector emissions remain the biggest source of climate change, many least-developed countries still invest in fossil-fuel development paths. These countries generally have high levels of fossil fuel technology lock-in and low capacities to change, making the shift to sustainable energy difficult. Tanzania, a telling example, is projected to triple fossil-fuel power production in the next decade. This article assesses the potential to use internationally supported Nationally Appropriate Mitigation Actions (NAMAs) to develop solar energy in Tanzania and contribute to transformational change of the electricity supply system. By assessing the cultural legitimacy of NAMAs among key stakeholders in the solar energy sector, we analyse the conditions for successful uptake of the concept in (1) national political thought and institutional frameworks and (2) the solar energy niche. Interview data are analysed from a multi-level perspective on transition, focusing on its cultural dimension. Several framings undermining legitimacy are articulated, such as attaching low-actor credibility to responsible agencies and the concept’s poor fit with political priorities. Actors that discern opportunities for NAMAs could, however, draw on a framing of high commensurability between experienced social needs and opportunities to use NAMAs to address them through climate compatible development. This legitimises NAMAs and could challenge opposing framings.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Taylor & Francis, 2016. 1-20 p.
Keyword [en]
Transformational change; sustainability; NAMAs; Tanzania; solar power; MLP
National Category
Energy Systems Social Sciences Interdisciplinary
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:liu:diva-126668DOI: 10.1080/13549839.2016.1161607OAI: oai:DiVA.org:liu-126668DiVA: diva2:916158
Funder
Swedish Energy Agency
Available from: 2016-04-01 Created: 2016-04-01 Last updated: 2016-05-04Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

The full text will be freely available from 2017-03-24 00:00
Available from 2017-03-24 00:00

Other links

Publisher's full text

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Amars, LatifMathias, FridahlLinnér, Björn-Ola
By organisation
Tema Environmental ChangeCentre for Climate Science and Policy Research Faculty of Arts and Sciences
In the same journal
Local Environment: the International Journal of Justice and Sustainability
Energy SystemsSocial Sciences Interdisciplinary

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

Altmetric score

Total: 164 hits
ReferencesLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link