liu.seSearch for publications in DiVA
Change search
ReferencesLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Trends in dialysis modality choice and related patient survival in the ERA-EDTA Registry over a 20-year period
University of Amsterdam, Netherlands.
University of Amsterdam, Netherlands.
Linköping University, Department of Medical and Health Sciences, Division of Drug Research. Linköping University, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences. Region Östergötland, Heart and Medicine Center, Department of Nephrology.
Hospital del Mar, Spain.
Show others and affiliations
2016 (English)In: Nephrology, Dialysis and Transplantation, ISSN 0931-0509, E-ISSN 1460-2385, Vol. 31, no 1, 120-128 p.Article in journal (Refereed) PublishedText
Abstract [en]

Background. Although previous studies suggest similar patient survival for peritoneal dialysis (PD) and haemodialysis (HD), PD use has decreased worldwide. We aimed to study trends in the choice of first dialysis modality and relate these to variation in patient and technique survival and kidney transplant rates in Europe over the last 20 years. Methods. We used data from 196 076 patients within the European Renal Association-European Dialysis and Transplant Association (ERA-EDTA) Registry who started renal replacement therapy (RRT) between 1993 and 2012. Trends in the incidence rate and prevalence on Day 91 after commencing RRT were quantified with Joinpoint regression. Crude and adjusted hazard ratios (HRs) for 5-year dialysis patient and technique survival were calculated using Cox regression. Analyses were repeated using propensity score matching to control for confounding by indication. Results. PD prevalence dropped since 2007 and HD prevalence stabilized since 2009. Incidence rates of PD and HD decreased from 2000 and 2009, respectively, while the incidence of kidney transplantation increased from 1993 onwards. Similar 5-year patient survival for PD versus HD patients was found in 1993-97 [adjusted HR: 1.02, 95% confidence interval (95% CI): 0.98-1.06], while survival was higher for PD patients in 2003-07 (HR: 0.91, 95% CI: 0.88-0.95). Both PD (HR: 0.95, 95% CI: 0.91-1.00) and HD technique survival (HR: 0.93, 95% CI: 0.87-0.99) improved in 2003-07 compared with 1993-97. Conclusions. Although initiating RRT on PD was associated with favourable patient survival when compared with starting on HD treatment, PD was often not selected as initial dialysis modality. Over time, we observed a significant decline in PD use and a stabilization inHD use. These observations were explained by the lower incidence rate of PD and HD and the increase in pre-emptive transplantation.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
OXFORD UNIV PRESS , 2016. Vol. 31, no 1, 120-128 p.
Keyword [en]
end-stage renal disease; haemodialysis; peritoneal dialysis; survival analysis; trends over time
National Category
Clinical Medicine
URN: urn:nbn:se:liu:diva-126862DOI: 10.1093/ndt/gfv295ISI: 000371234600018PubMedID: 26311215OAI: diva2:917121
Available from: 2016-04-05 Created: 2016-04-05 Last updated: 2016-04-05

Open Access in DiVA

No full text

Other links

Publisher's full textPubMed

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Segelmark, Mårten
By organisation
Division of Drug ResearchFaculty of Medicine and Health SciencesDepartment of Nephrology
In the same journal
Nephrology, Dialysis and Transplantation
Clinical Medicine

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

Altmetric score

Total: 110 hits
ReferencesLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link