liu.seSearch for publications in DiVA
System disruptions
We are currently experiencing disruptions on the search portals due to high traffic. We are working to resolve the issue, you may temporarily encounter an error message.
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • oxford
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Perceptions of complementary therapies among Swedish registered professions in surgical care
Department of Surgery, Institute of Clinical Science, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg; Department of Surgery, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden.ORCID iD: 0000-0002-8500-2245
Institute of Health and Care Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg; Department of Surgery, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden.
Institute of Neuroscience and Physiology, Sahlgrenska academy, University of Gothenburg; Department of Surgery, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden.
2011 (English)In: Complementary Therapies in Clinical Practice, ISSN 1744-3881, E-ISSN 1873-6947, Vol. 17, no 1, p. 44-49Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

There is increasing interest in complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) among healthcare professions. However, no studies have been conducted in Sweden or in a surgical context. The aim of this study is to describe different perceptions of complementary therapies among registered healthcare professions in Swedish surgical care. Sixteen interviews were conducted with registered physicians, nurses, physiotherapists and clinical dieticians at a Swedish university hospital. Analysis was made with a phenomenographic research approach. The findings showed variations in perceptions of the definition of complementary therapies. A constructive approach toward use was observed, but there was a conflict in matters of indications and contraindications, and also criticism over a lack of knowledge. There was seen to be a need for education to be able to act professionally. Scepticism over high costs of treatment was highlighted. In conclusion, a need for policies on management, education and research in the field of CAM should be addressed.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
London, UK: Churchill Livingstone , 2011. Vol. 17, no 1, p. 44-49
National Category
Surgery
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:liu:diva-127377DOI: 10.1016/j.ctcp.2010.05.004PubMedID: 21168114OAI: oai:DiVA.org:liu-127377DiVA, id: diva2:922630
Available from: 2016-04-24 Created: 2016-04-24 Last updated: 2017-11-30Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Publisher's full textPubMed

Authority records

Bjerså, Kristofer

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Bjerså, Kristofer
In the same journal
Complementary Therapies in Clinical Practice
Surgery

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn
Total: 220 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • oxford
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf