liu.seSearch for publications in DiVA
Change search
ReferencesLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Facilitation effects of cueing techniques in two Sesotho speakers with anomia
University of Louisiana at Lafayette, PO Box 43170, Lafayette, LA 70504-3170, USA.
Linköping University, Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Speech and Language Pathology. Linköping University, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences.ORCID iD: 0000-0002-4405-5340
University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, 1 Jan Smuts Avenue, Braamfontein, Gauteng 2000, South Africa.
2016 (English)In: Speech, Language and Hearing, ISSN 2050-571XArticle in journal (Refereed) Epub ahead of print
Abstract [en]

Aphasiologists developing treatments for anomia should closely align therapy methods with the typological and morphological characteristics of the language in question. The lead author initiated this study to develop more defensible interventions for speakers of Sesotho, a South African language. Prefix-based cueing (our alternative name for initial phoneme cueing that describes these cues in Sesotho-oriented terms) was compared to a novel technique, root-based cueing (RBC). While prefix-based cues are described in the literature, we hypothesized root-based cues would be more appropriate in this context since they were thought to be more consonant with the linguistic parameters of Sesotho. Two speakers with aphasia, who demonstrated significant anomic symptoms, served as participants. We used a multiple-baseline, single case study design. Two 144-item word lists were developed with every item represented by a photograph. Each of the two word lists was associated with one of the two cueing techniques investigated. After baseline measurements were obtained, each participant attended eight facilitation sessions for each cueing condition, resulting in eight data points per condition and participant. For both participants, RBC resulted in greater naming performance than cueing by means of initial phonemes. Our explanation of these results is based on the Interactive Lexical Network model of lexical access; root-based cues may be more effective because they more efficiently constrain the number of lemmas activated after a cue is provided. We argue that a confluence of factors (word-retrieval processes and the character of Sesotho morphosyntax) gave rise to the noted differences in naming facilitation.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2016.
Keyword [en]
Aphasia, Anomia
National Category
General Language Studies and Linguistics
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:liu:diva-128689DOI: 10.1080/2050571X.2016.1155817OAI: oai:DiVA.org:liu-128689DiVA: diva2:931522
Available from: 2016-05-28 Created: 2016-05-28 Last updated: 2016-07-07

Open Access in DiVA

The full text will be freely available from 2017-03-24 11:07
Available from 2017-03-24 11:07

Other links

Publisher's full text

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Müller, Nicole
By organisation
Speech and Language PathologyFaculty of Medicine and Health Sciences
General Language Studies and Linguistics

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

Altmetric score

Total: 65 hits
ReferencesLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link