liu.seSearch for publications in DiVA
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • oxford
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology-Nutritional Epidemiology (STROBE-nut): An Extension of the STROBE Statement
University of Ghent, Belgium; Institute Trop Med, Belgium.
University of Ghent, Belgium.
National Institute Public Health and Environm, Netherlands.
University of Gothenburg, Sweden.
Show others and affiliations
2016 (English)In: PLoS Medicine, ISSN 1549-1277, E-ISSN 1549-1676, Vol. 13, no 6, e1002036- p.Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Resource type
Text
Abstract [en]

Background Concerns have been raised about the quality of reporting in nutritional epidemiology. Research reporting guidelines such as the Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement can improve quality of reporting in observational studies. Herein, we propose recommendations for reporting nutritional epidemiology and dietary assessment research by extending the STROBE statement into Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology-Nutritional Epidemiology (STROBE-nut). Methods and Findings Recommendations for the reporting of nutritional epidemiology and dietary assessment research were developed following a systematic and consultative process, coordinated by a multidisciplinary group of 21 experts. Consensus on reporting guidelines was reached through a three-round Delphi consultation process with 53 external experts. In total, 24 recommendations for nutritional epidemiology were added to the STROBE checklist. Conclusion When used appropriately, reporting guidelines for nutritional epidemiology can contribute to improve reporting of observational studies with a focus on diet and health.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
PUBLIC LIBRARY SCIENCE , 2016. Vol. 13, no 6, e1002036- p.
National Category
Nutrition and Dietetics
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:liu:diva-130294DOI: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1002036ISI: 000379128200007PubMedID: 27270749OAI: oai:DiVA.org:liu-130294DiVA: diva2:950505
Available from: 2016-07-31 Created: 2016-07-28 Last updated: 2017-11-28

Open Access in DiVA

fulltext(808 kB)32 downloads
File information
File name FULLTEXT01.pdfFile size 808 kBChecksum SHA-512
d96ca3710f9816e51d452f74d791df6dd4bf536b6feeb62829a960b4efe583177031259e094220f2dc9cd8ec1eba8a42ac8089887d6e4078a720fa9b6b159ed1
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf

Other links

Publisher's full textPubMed

Authority records BETA

Forsum, Elisabet

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Forsum, Elisabet
By organisation
Division of Clinical SciencesFaculty of Medicine and Health Sciences
In the same journal
PLoS Medicine
Nutrition and Dietetics

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
Total: 32 downloads
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn
Total: 55 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • oxford
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf