liu.seSearch for publications in DiVA
Change search
ReferencesLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
2016 Consensus statement on return to sport from the First World Congress in Sports Physical Therapy, Bern
Linköping University, Department of Medical and Health Sciences, Division of Physiotherapy. Linköping University, Faculty of Health Sciences. Aspetar Orthopaed and Sports Medical Hospital, Qatar; La Trobe University, Australia.
Sport Northern Ireland Sports Institute, North Ireland; University of Ulster, North Ireland.
Central Queensland University, Australia.
Aspetar Orthopaed and Sports Medical Hospital, Qatar; University of Ghent, Belgium.
Show others and affiliations
2016 (English)In: British Journal of Sports Medicine, ISSN 0306-3674, E-ISSN 1473-0480, Vol. 50, no 14, 853-864 p.Article in journal (Refereed) PublishedText
Abstract [en]

Deciding when to return to sport after injury is complex and multifactorial-an exercise in risk management. Return to sport decisions are made every day by clinicians, athletes and coaches, ideally in a collaborative way. The purpose of this consensus statement was to present and synthesise current evidence to make recommendations for return to sport decision-making, clinical practice and future research directions related to returning athletes to sport. A half day meeting was held in Bern, Switzerland, after the First World Congress in Sports Physical Therapy. 17 expert clinicians participated. 4 main sections were initially agreed upon, then participants elected to join 1 of the 4 groups-each group focused on 1 section of the consensus statement. Participants in each group discussed and summarised the key issues for their section before the 17-member group met again for discussion to reach consensus on the content of the 4 sections. Return to sport is not a decision taken in isolation at the end of the recovery and rehabilitation process. Instead, return to sport should be viewed as a continuum, paralleled with recovery and rehabilitation. Biopsychosocial models may help the clinician make sense of individual factors that may influence the athletes return to sport, and the Strategic Assessment of Risk and Risk Tolerance framework may help decision-makers synthesise information to make an optimal return to sport decision. Research evidence to support return to sport decisions in clinical practice is scarce. Future research should focus on a standardised approach to defining, measuring and reporting return to sport outcomes, and identifying valuable prognostic factors for returning to sport.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
BMJ PUBLISHING GROUP , 2016. Vol. 50, no 14, 853-864 p.
National Category
Sport and Fitness Sciences
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:liu:diva-130416DOI: 10.1136/bjsports-2016-096278ISI: 000379238400009PubMedID: 27226389OAI: oai:DiVA.org:liu-130416DiVA: diva2:952650
Available from: 2016-08-15 Created: 2016-08-05 Last updated: 2016-08-15

Open Access in DiVA

No full text

Other links

Publisher's full textPubMed

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Ardern, Clare
By organisation
Division of PhysiotherapyFaculty of Health Sciences
In the same journal
British Journal of Sports Medicine
Sport and Fitness Sciences

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

Altmetric score

Total: 49 hits
ReferencesLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link