liu.seSearch for publications in DiVA
Change search
ReferencesLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Att delta eller stå bredvid: Upprättelseprocesser och historikerns risker och möjligheter
Linköping University, Department of Thematic Studies, Department of Child Studies. Linköping University, Faculty of Arts and Sciences. (Gränser för upprättelse)
Linköping University, Department of Thematic Studies, Department of Child Studies. Linköping University, Faculty of Arts and Sciences. (Gränser för upprättelse)
2016 (Swedish)In: Historisk Tidskrift (S), ISSN 0345-469X, Vol. 136, no 3, 383-411 p.Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Historical knowledge is crucial for inquiries, truth commissions and redress processes that aim to offer redress to victims of historical child abuse in out-of-home care. The professional competence of historians has much to offer, but taking part in such political processes means that the historian faces certain challenges. This article explores the ethical, emotional, epistemological and methodological risks historians may encounter when involved in redress processes, but also the consequences of historians’ absence from such processes. The authors have contributed with their expertise at various stages of the Swedish redress process and use their own experiences as well as those of other researchers who have been involved in redress processes to discuss the issues at stake.

Inquiries and redress processes addressing  historical child abuse within out-of-home care constitute  a growing field within reparative justice where historians have as yet figured only in the margins. The authors suggest that historians have an ethical and moral responsibility to contribute to this field. But such contributions mean facing ethical risks because of the blurry distinction in the legal regulations of research ethics, which fails to clearly separate research that require permission from ethical vetting boards from research by official authorities that is exempted from such requirements.  In addition, the confrontation with traumatic stories of abuse represents a possible exposure to emotional risks. Historians, who are seldom professionally trained to reflect on their own or their informants’ emotions, need to be attentive to reactions from such exposure and to learn from other academic fields in this respect. The fact that investigators write normative reports for multiple audiences (victims, politicians, academics and the general public) with the objective of both recognizing the victims’ testimonies of abuse as well as offering an account of ‘what really happened’, means that the historian have to re-evaluate her/his epistemological stance and maybe also navigate between different methodological approaches such as constructivism and positivism. These challenges are accentuated when individual cases are tested to meet the legal requirements of a financial redress process. Without historical contextual expertise guiding such processes redressing the past can come to rely on anecdotal historical knowledge that distance the past from the present instead of an understanding of how past and present are intersected and how the (non-)existence of measurements to address child abuse have a legacy in our own time.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Stockholm: Svenska Historiska Föreningen , 2016. Vol. 136, no 3, 383-411 p.
Keyword [en]
reparative justice, child abuse, redress, self-reflexion, truth commission, state responsibility, ethics, epistemology
National Category
History Social Sciences Interdisciplinary
URN: urn:nbn:se:liu:diva-131464OAI: diva2:972625
Gränser för upprättelse
Forte, Swedish Research Council for Health, Working Life and Welfare, 2014-0279
Available from: 2016-09-21 Created: 2016-09-21 Last updated: 2016-09-27Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text

Other links

Link to publication

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Sköld, JohannaSandin, Bengt
By organisation
Department of Child StudiesFaculty of Arts and Sciences
In the same journal
Historisk Tidskrift (S)
HistorySocial Sciences Interdisciplinary

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

Total: 14 hits
ReferencesLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link