liu.seSearch for publications in DiVA
Change search
Refine search result
1 - 2 of 2
CiteExportLink to result list
Permanent link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • oxford
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Rows per page
  • 5
  • 10
  • 20
  • 50
  • 100
  • 250
Sort
  • Standard (Relevance)
  • Author A-Ö
  • Author Ö-A
  • Title A-Ö
  • Title Ö-A
  • Publication type A-Ö
  • Publication type Ö-A
  • Issued (Oldest first)
  • Issued (Newest first)
  • Created (Oldest first)
  • Created (Newest first)
  • Last updated (Oldest first)
  • Last updated (Newest first)
  • Disputation date (earliest first)
  • Disputation date (latest first)
  • Standard (Relevance)
  • Author A-Ö
  • Author Ö-A
  • Title A-Ö
  • Title Ö-A
  • Publication type A-Ö
  • Publication type Ö-A
  • Issued (Oldest first)
  • Issued (Newest first)
  • Created (Oldest first)
  • Created (Newest first)
  • Last updated (Oldest first)
  • Last updated (Newest first)
  • Disputation date (earliest first)
  • Disputation date (latest first)
Select
The maximal number of hits you can export is 250. When you want to export more records please use the Create feeds function.
  • 1.
    Hansen, Peo
    et al.
    Linköping University, REMESO - Institute for Research on Migration, Ethnicity and Society. Linköping University, Department of Social and Welfare Studies. Linköping University, Faculty of Arts and Sciences.
    Jonsson, Stefan
    Linköping University, REMESO - Institute for Research on Migration, Ethnicity and Society. Linköping University, Department of Social and Welfare Studies. Linköping University, Faculty of Arts and Sciences.
    Another Colonialism: Africa in the History of European Integration2014In: Journal of Historical Sociology, ISSN 0952-1909, E-ISSN 1467-6443, Vol. 27, no 3, p. 442-461Article in journal (Refereed)
    Abstract [en]

    Today’s European Union was founded in a 1950s marked by its member

    states’ involvement in numerous colonial conflicts and with the colonial question

    firmly entrenched on the European and international agenda. This notwithstanding,

    there is hardly any scholarly investigations to date that have examined colonialism’s

    bearing on the historical project and process of European integration. In tackling

    this puzzle, the present article proceeds in two steps. First, it corroborates the claim

    that European integration not only is related to the history of colonialism but to no

    little extent determined by it. Second, it introduces a set of factors that explain why

    the relation between the EU and colonialism has been systematically neglected. Here

    the article seeks to identify the operations of a colonial epistemology that has

    facilitated a misrecognition of what postwar European integration was about. As the

    article argues, this epistemology has enabled colonialism’s historical relation to the

    European integration project to remain undetected and has thus also reproduced

    within the present EU precisely those colonial or neo-colonial preconceptions that

    the European partner states, in official discourse and policy, falsely claim that they

    have abandoned.

    Download full text (pdf)
    fulltext
  • 2.
    Swain, Shurlee
    et al.
    Australian Catholic University, Melbourne, Australia.
    Katie, Wright
    La Trobe University, Melbourne, Australia.
    Sköld, Johanna
    Linköping University, Department of Thematic Studies, Department of Child Studies. Linköping University, Faculty of Arts and Sciences.
    Conceptualising and categorising child abuse inquiries: From damage control to foregrounding survivor testimony2018In: Journal of Historical Sociology, ISSN 0952-1909, E-ISSN 1467-6443, Vol. 31, no 3, p. 282-296Article in journal (Refereed)
    Abstract [en]

    Testimony before inquiries into out-of-home carethat have taken place in many countries over the last twenty years has severelydisrupted received ideas about the quality of care given to children in thepast. Evidence of the widespread abuse of children presented before recentinquiries internationally gives rise to the question: why didn’t we know? Partof the answer lies in the changing forms and functions of inquiries, whoseinterests they serve, how they are organised and how they gather evidence. Usingas a case study, a survey of historical abuse inquiries in Australia, this articleexplores the shift to victim and survivor testimony and in so doing offers anew way of conceptualising and categorising historical child abuse inquiries.It focuses less on how inquiries are constituted or governed, and insteadadvances an historically contextualised approach that foregrounds the issue of who speaks and who is heard.

1 - 2 of 2
CiteExportLink to result list
Permanent link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • oxford
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf