liu.seSearch for publications in DiVA
Change search
Refine search result
1 - 1 of 1
CiteExportLink to result list
Permanent link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • oxford
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Rows per page
  • 5
  • 10
  • 20
  • 50
  • 100
  • 250
Sort
  • Standard (Relevance)
  • Author A-Ö
  • Author Ö-A
  • Title A-Ö
  • Title Ö-A
  • Publication type A-Ö
  • Publication type Ö-A
  • Issued (Oldest first)
  • Issued (Newest first)
  • Created (Oldest first)
  • Created (Newest first)
  • Last updated (Oldest first)
  • Last updated (Newest first)
  • Disputation date (earliest first)
  • Disputation date (latest first)
  • Standard (Relevance)
  • Author A-Ö
  • Author Ö-A
  • Title A-Ö
  • Title Ö-A
  • Publication type A-Ö
  • Publication type Ö-A
  • Issued (Oldest first)
  • Issued (Newest first)
  • Created (Oldest first)
  • Created (Newest first)
  • Last updated (Oldest first)
  • Last updated (Newest first)
  • Disputation date (earliest first)
  • Disputation date (latest first)
Select
The maximal number of hits you can export is 250. When you want to export more records please use the Create feeds function.
  • 1.
    Engström, A E
    et al.
    University of Amsterdam, Netherlands .
    Granfeldt, Hans
    Linköping University, Department of Medical and Health Sciences, Thoracic Surgery. Linköping University, Faculty of Health Sciences. Östergötlands Läns Landsting, Heart and Medicine Center, Department of Thoracic and Vascular Surgery.
    Seybold-Epting, W
    Westpfalz Klinikum, Germany .
    Dahm, M
    Westpfalz Klinikum, Germany .
    Cocchieri, R
    University of Amsterdam, Netherlands .
    Driessen, A H G
    University of Amsterdam, Netherlands .
    Sjauw, K D
    University of Amsterdam, Netherlands .
    Vis, M M
    University of Amsterdam, Netherlands .
    Baan, J
    University of Amsterdam, Netherlands .
    Koch, K T
    University of Amsterdam, Netherlands .
    De Jong, M
    University of Amsterdam, Netherlands .
    Lagrand, W K
    University of Amsterdam, Netherlands .
    Van Der Sloot, J A P
    University of Amsterdam, Netherlands .
    Tijssen, J G P
    University of Amsterdam, Netherlands .
    De Winter, R J
    University of Amsterdam, Netherlands .
    De Mol, B A J M
    University of Amsterdam, Netherlands .
    Piek, J J
    University of Amsterdam, Netherlands .
    Henriques, J P S
    University of Amsterdam, Netherlands .
    Mechanical circulatory support with the Impella 5.0 device for postcardiotomy cardiogenic shock: a three-center experience2013In: Minerva Cardioangiologica: Journal on Cardiovascular Pathophysiology, Clinical Medicine and Therapy, ISSN 0026-4725, E-ISSN 1827-1618, Vol. 61, no 5, p. 539-546Article in journal (Refereed)
    Abstract [en]

    AIM:

    Postcardiotomy cardiogenic shock (PCCS) is associated with high mortality rates, despite full conventional treatment. Although the results of treatment with surgically implantable ventricular assist devices have been encouraging, the invasiveness of this treatment limits its applicability. Several less invasive devices have been developed, including the Impella system. The objective of this study was to describe our three-center experience with the Impella 5.0 device in the setting of PCCS.

    METHODS:

    From January 2004 through December 2010, a total of 46 patients were diagnosed with treatment-refractory PCCS and treated with the Impella 5.0 percutaneous left ventricular assist device at three european heart centers. Baseline and follow-up characteristics were collected retrospectively and entered into a dedicated database.

    RESULTS:

    Within the study cohort of 46 patients, mean logistic and additive EuroSCORES were 24 ± 19 and 10 ± 4. The majority of patients underwent coronary artery bypass grafting (48%) or combined surgery (33%). Half of all patients had been treated with an intra-aortic balloon pump before 5.0-implantation, 1 patient had been treated with an Impella 2.5 device. All patients were on mechanical ventilation and intravenous inotropes. The Kaplan-Meier estimate of overall 30-day survival was 39.5%.

    CONCLUSION:

    Thirty-day survival rates for patients with PCCS, refractory to aggressive conventional treatment and treated with the Impella 5.0 device, are comparable to those reported in studies evaluating surgically implantable VADs, whereas the Impella system is much less invasive. Therefore, mechanical circulatory support with the Impella 5.0 device is a suitable treatment modality for patients with severe PCCS.

1 - 1 of 1
CiteExportLink to result list
Permanent link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • oxford
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf