liu.seSearch for publications in DiVA
Change search
Refine search result
1 - 10 of 10
CiteExportLink to result list
Permanent link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • oxford
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Rows per page
  • 5
  • 10
  • 20
  • 50
  • 100
  • 250
Sort
  • Standard (Relevance)
  • Author A-Ö
  • Author Ö-A
  • Title A-Ö
  • Title Ö-A
  • Publication type A-Ö
  • Publication type Ö-A
  • Issued (Oldest first)
  • Issued (Newest first)
  • Created (Oldest first)
  • Created (Newest first)
  • Last updated (Oldest first)
  • Last updated (Newest first)
  • Disputation date (earliest first)
  • Disputation date (latest first)
  • Standard (Relevance)
  • Author A-Ö
  • Author Ö-A
  • Title A-Ö
  • Title Ö-A
  • Publication type A-Ö
  • Publication type Ö-A
  • Issued (Oldest first)
  • Issued (Newest first)
  • Created (Oldest first)
  • Created (Newest first)
  • Last updated (Oldest first)
  • Last updated (Newest first)
  • Disputation date (earliest first)
  • Disputation date (latest first)
Select
The maximal number of hits you can export is 250. When you want to export more records please use the Create feeds function.
  • 1.
    Berzell, Martin
    et al.
    Linköping University, Department of Culture and Communication, Culture and Aesthetics. Linköping University, Faculty of Arts and Sciences.
    Szigeti, András
    Linköping University, Department of Culture and Communication, Culture and Aesthetics. Linköping University, Faculty of Arts and Sciences.
    Lycka utan glädje?: stoicismens och epikurismens bild av njutning och det goda livet2019In: Tankar om lycka: några kulturvetenskapliga forskares perspektiv / [ed] Kjell O. Lejon, Stockholm: Carlsson Bokförlag, 2019, Vol. 269-290, p. 269-290Chapter in book (Other academic)
  • 2.
    Malmqvist, Erik
    et al.
    Univ Gothenburg, Sweden.
    Szigeti, András
    Linköping University, Department of Culture and Communication, Culture and Aesthetics. Linköping University, Faculty of Arts and Sciences. Lund Gothenburg Responsibil Project, Sweden.
    Exploitation and Joint Action2019In: Journal of social philosophy, ISSN 0047-2786, E-ISSN 1467-9833, Vol. 50, no 3, p. 280-300Article in journal (Refereed)
    Abstract [en]

    n/a

    Download full text (pdf)
    fulltext
  • 3.
    Malmqvist, Erik
    et al.
    Univ Gothenburg, Sweden.
    Szigeti, András
    Linköping University, Department of Culture and Communication, Culture and Aesthetics. Linköping University, Faculty of Arts and Sciences. Lund Univ, Sweden.
    Exploitation and Remedial Duties2019In: Journal of Applied Philosophy, ISSN 0264-3758, E-ISSN 1468-5930Article in journal (Refereed)
    Abstract [en]

    The concept of exploitation and potentially exploitative real-world practices are the subject of increasing philosophical attention. However, while philosophers have extensively debated what exploitation is and what makes it wrong, they have said surprisingly little about what might be required to remediate it. By asking how the consequences of exploitation should be addressed, this article seeks to contribute to filling this gap. We raise two questions. First, what are the victims of exploitation owed by way of remediation? Second, who ought to remediate? Our answers to these questions are connected by the idea that exploitation cannot be fully remediated by redistributing the exploiters gain in order to repair or compensate the victims loss. This is because exploitation causes not only distributive but also relational harm. Therefore, redistributive measures are necessary but not sufficient for adequate remediation. Moreover, this relational focus highlights the fact that exploitative real-world practices commonly involve agents other than the exploiter who stand to benefit from the exploitation. Insofar as these third parties are implicated in the distributive and relational harms caused by exploitation, there is, we argue, good reason to assign part of the burden of remediation to them.

    Download full text (pdf)
    fulltext
  • 4.
    Michael, John Andrew
    et al.
    Univ Warwick, England; Cent European Univ, Hungary.
    Szigeti, András
    Linköping University, Department of Culture and Communication, Culture and Aesthetics. Linköping University, Faculty of Arts and Sciences. Lund Univ, Sweden.
    The Group Knobe Effect2019In: Philosophical Explorations, ISSN 1386-9795, E-ISSN 1741-5918, Vol. 22, no 1, p. 44-61Article in journal (Refereed)
    Abstract [en]

    In the current paper, we present and discuss a series of experiments in which we investigated peoples willingness to ascribe intentions, as well as blame and praise, to groups. The experiments draw upon the so-called "Knobe Effect". Knobe [2003. "Intentional action and side effects in ordinary language." Analysis 63: 190-194] found that the positiveness or negativeness of side-effects of actions influences peoples assessment of whether those side-effects were brought about intentionally, and also that people are more willing to assign blame for negative side-effects of actions than they are to assign praise for positive side-effect of actions. Building upon this research, we found evidence that the positiveness or negativeness of side-effects of group actions influences peoples willingness to attribute intentions to groups (Experiment 1a), and that people are more willing to assign blame to groups for negative side-effects of actions than they are to assign praise to groups for positive side-effects of actions (Experiment 1b). We also found evidence (Experiments 2a, 2b, 3 and 4) that the "Group Knobe Effect" persists even when intentions and blame/praise are attributed to groups non-distributively, indicating that people tend not to think of group intentions and group blame/praise in distributive terms. We conclude that the folk are collectivist about group intentions, and also about the blameworthiness and praiseworthiness of groups.

    Download full text (pdf)
    fulltext
  • 5.
    Salice, Alessandro
    et al.
    Univ Coll Cork, Ireland.
    Michael, John
    Univ Warwick, England.
    Szigeti, András
    Linköping University, Department of Culture and Communication, Culture and Aesthetics. Linköping University, Faculty of Arts and Sciences.
    Thinking (about) groups: a special issue of Synthese2019In: Synthese, ISSN 0039-7857, E-ISSN 1573-0964, Vol. 196, no 12, p. 4809-4812Article in journal (Refereed)
    Abstract [en]

    n/a

  • 6.
    Szigeti, András
    Linköping University, Department of Culture and Communication, Culture and Aesthetics. Linköping University, Faculty of Arts and Sciences.
    E pluribus unum - av många, en: Andra som agerar2018In: Perspektiv på "den andre" / [ed] Kjell O. Lejon, Carlsson Bokförlag, 2018, p. 267-280Chapter in book (Other academic)
  • 7.
    Szigeti, András
    Linköping University, Department of Culture and Communication, Culture and Aesthetics. Linköping University, Faculty of Arts and Sciences. Ethical Theory and Moral Practice, Germany; Lund Univ, Sweden.
    Editorial 5/20182018In: Ethical Theory and Moral Practice, ISSN 1386-2820, E-ISSN 1572-8447, Vol. 21, no 5, p. 1029-1031Article in journal (Other academic)
    Abstract [en]

    n/a

    Download full text (pdf)
    fulltext
  • 8.
    Szigeti, András
    Linköping University, Department of Culture and Communication, Arts and Humanities. Linköping University, Faculty of Arts and Sciences.
    Kan vi förlåta de döda?2017In: Föreställningar om döden: forskares aspekter på vår existens och dess begränsningar / [ed] Kjell O. Lejon, Stockholm: Carlsson Bokförlag, 2017, p. 258-270Chapter in book (Other academic)
  • 9.
    Szigeti, András
    Linköping University, Department of Culture and Communication, Arts and Humanities. Linköping University, Faculty of Arts and Sciences. UiT Arctic University of Norway, Norway.
    Sentimentalism and Moral Dilemmas2015In: Dialectica, ISSN 0012-2017, E-ISSN 1746-8361, Vol. 69, no 1Article in journal (Refereed)
    Abstract [en]

    It is sometimes said that certain hard moral choices constitute tragic moral dilemmas in which no available course of action is justifiable, and so the agent is blameworthy whatever she chooses. This paper criticizes a certain approach to the debate about moral dilemmas and considers the metaethical implications of the criticisms. The approach in question has been taken by many advocates as well as opponents of moral dilemmas who believe that analysing the emotional response of the agent is the key to the debate about moral dilemmas. The metaethical position this approach is most naturally associated with is sentimentalism. Sentimentalists claim that evaluation, and in particular moral evaluation, crucially depends on human sentiment. This paper is not concerned with the question whether moral dilemmas exist, but rather with emotion-based arguments used on both sides of the debate. The first aim of the paper is to show that emotion-based arguments by friends or foes of moral dilemmas cannot garner support from sentimentalism. The second aim is to show that this constitutes a serious problem for sentimentalism.

    Download full text (pdf)
    fulltext
  • 10.
    Szigeti, András
    Linköping University, Department of Culture and Communication, Arts and Humanities. Linköping University, Faculty of Arts and Sciences.
    Shared Agency: A Planning Theory of Acting Together2015In: Ethical Theory and Moral Practice, ISSN 1386-2820, E-ISSN 1572-8447, Vol. 18, no 5, p. 1101-1104Article, book review (Other academic)
    Abstract [en]

    n/a

1 - 10 of 10
CiteExportLink to result list
Permanent link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • oxford
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf