liu.seSearch for publications in DiVA
Change search
Refine search result
12 1 - 50 of 66
CiteExportLink to result list
Permanent link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • oxford
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Rows per page
  • 5
  • 10
  • 20
  • 50
  • 100
  • 250
Sort
  • Standard (Relevance)
  • Author A-Ö
  • Author Ö-A
  • Title A-Ö
  • Title Ö-A
  • Publication type A-Ö
  • Publication type Ö-A
  • Issued (Oldest first)
  • Issued (Newest first)
  • Created (Oldest first)
  • Created (Newest first)
  • Last updated (Oldest first)
  • Last updated (Newest first)
  • Disputation date (earliest first)
  • Disputation date (latest first)
  • Standard (Relevance)
  • Author A-Ö
  • Author Ö-A
  • Title A-Ö
  • Title Ö-A
  • Publication type A-Ö
  • Publication type Ö-A
  • Issued (Oldest first)
  • Issued (Newest first)
  • Created (Oldest first)
  • Created (Newest first)
  • Last updated (Oldest first)
  • Last updated (Newest first)
  • Disputation date (earliest first)
  • Disputation date (latest first)
Select
The maximal number of hits you can export is 250. When you want to export more records please use the Create feeds function.
  • 1.
    Adelsvärd, Viveka
    et al.
    Linköping University, Faculty of Arts and Sciences. Linköping University, The Tema Institute, Department of Communications Studies.
    Aronsson, Karin
    Linköping University, Faculty of Arts and Sciences. Linköping University, The Tema Institute, Department of Child Studies.
    Linell, Per
    Linköping University, Faculty of Arts and Sciences. Linköping University, The Tema Institute, Department of Communications Studies.
    Discourse of blame. Courtroom construction of social reality from the perspective of the defendant.1988In: Semiotica, ISSN 0037-1998, E-ISSN 1613-3692, Vol. 71, p. 261-284Article in journal (Refereed)
  • 2.
    Adelswärd, Viveka
    et al.
    Linköping University, The Tema Institute, Department of Communications Studies. Linköping University, Faculty of Arts and Sciences.
    Economou, Konstantin
    Linköping University, The Tema Institute, Department of Communications Studies. Linköping University, Faculty of Arts and Sciences.
    Forstorp, Per-Anders
    Linköping University, The Tema Institute, Department of Communications Studies. Linköping University, Faculty of Arts and Sciences.
    Linell, Per
    Linköping University, The Tema Institute, Department of Communications Studies. Linköping University, Faculty of Arts and Sciences.
    Samtal i samhället: på vems villkor1997In: Rhetorica Scandinavica, ISSN 1397-0534, no 1, p. 38-43Article in journal (Refereed)
    Abstract [sv]

    Det offentliga samtalets dynamik och förändring står i blickpunkten för projektet Samtal i samhället. På vems villkor? Forfattarnas intresse är att med dialogteoretiska och samtalsanalytiska begrepp och metoder studera dynamiken inom och mellan olika offentliga arenor. Delprojekten inriktar sig på diskurser där frågor om ansvar, säkerhet och risk, moral och politik står i fokus. Artikeln avslutas med en jämförelse mellan retorik och kommunikationsforskning.

  • 3.
    Andrén, Mats
    et al.
    Lund University.
    Sanne, Johan M.
    Linköping University, The Tema Institute, Technology and Social Change. Linköping University, Faculty of Arts and Sciences.
    Linell, Per
    Linköping University, Department of Culture and Communication, Language and Culture. Linköping University, Faculty of Arts and Sciences.
    Striking the Balance between Formality and Informality in Safety-Critical Communication: The Case of Train Traffic Control Calls2010In: Journal of Pragmatics, ISSN 0378-2166, E-ISSN 1879-1387, Vol. 42, no 1, p. 220-241Article in journal (Refereed)
    Abstract [en]

    Talk in safety-critical activities displays features that distinguish it from both ordinaryconversations as well as from other institutional talk, but it also shares some features with these.Formality and informality are both interactionally accomplished phenomena, but they are shapedthrough different sources. Safety rules and pre-printed forms constitute two sources offormalization, dictating how to carry out communicative exchanges in certain types of situations,irrespective of the more specific circumstances in individual cases. Sources of informalization arethe participants’ need to adapt to situation-specific communicative needs, but also, ironicallyenough, routinization itself.In contemporary literature, safety-critical talk tends to be treated either in terms of strictadherence to a formal code, where all informalities are seen as potential sources of accidents, orinformalization is treated as natural and inevitable, focusing on routine conditions where they areapparently harmless. In this paper, based upon detailed analysis of telephone calls between traindrivers and dispatchers on the Swedish railway network, we propose a middle ground. We suggest acontingent theory of formalization, identifying four main types of informalizations, as well asdiscussing when and why they may be harmless and when they may be detrimental.

  • 4.
    Anward, Jan
    et al.
    Institutionen för lingvistik, Uppsala universitet.
    Linell, Per
    Institutionen för lingvistik, Uppsala universitet.
    Om lexikaliserade fraser i svenskan1975In: Nysvenska studier : tidskrift för svensk stil- och språkforskning, ISSN 0345-8768, Vol. 55-56, p. 77-119Article in journal (Other academic)
    Abstract [sv]

    Man får anta att språkbrukaren har till sitt förfogande ett lexikon innehållande lexikaliska enheter (byggstenar) och en grammatik innehållande regler för hur meningar (el. andra större enheter) konstrueras med de lexikaliska enheterna som byggstenar. De lexikaliska enheterna är inte enstaka morfem; snarare är de stammar eller 'ord', där de senare kan vara grundord, avledningar, sammansättningar etc. (se t.ex. Linell, 1976). Många lexikaliska enheter är emellertid av fraskaraktär. I den här uppsatsen skall vi behandla vissa av dessa s.k. lexikaliserade fraser, varvid vi skall belysa en rad skillnader mellan, på den ena sidan, sådana lexikonlagrade 'fasta förbindelser' och, på den andra sidan, syntaktiska nykonstruktioner (jfr Jespersens (1924: 18 ff.) termer 'formulas' resp. 'free expressions').

  • 5.
    Aronsson, Karin
    et al.
    Linköping University, Faculty of Arts and Sciences. Linköping University, The Tema Institute, Department of Child Studies.
    Jönsson, Linda
    Linköping University, Department of Language and Culture.
    Linell, Per
    Linköping University, Faculty of Arts and Sciences. Linköping University, The Tema Institute, Department of Communications Studies.
    The courtrooom hearing as a middle ground. Speech accommodation by lawyers and defendants.1987In: Journal of language and social psychology, ISSN 0261-927X, E-ISSN 1552-6526, Vol. 6, p. 99-115Article in journal (Refereed)
  • 6.
    Bakshi, Ann-Sofie
    et al.
    Linköping University, Faculty of Arts and Sciences. Linköping University, The Tema Institute, Department of Communications Studies.
    Linell, Per
    Linköping University, Faculty of Arts and Sciences. Linköping University, The Tema Institute, Department of Communications Studies.
    Wibeck, Victoria
    Linköping University, Faculty of Arts and Sciences. Linköping University, The Tema Institute, Department of Communications Studies.
    Att dra gränser mot det onaturliga och det otillåtna. Fokusgrupper om genteknik och gendiagnostik2000Report (Other academic)
  • 7.
    Bredmar, Margareta
    et al.
    Linköping University, Department of Behavioural Sciences.
    Linell, Per
    Linköping University, The Tema Institute, Department of Communications Studies. Linköping University, Faculty of Arts and Sciences.
    Reconfirming normality: the constitution of reassurance in talks between midwives and expectant mothers1999In: Talk, Work and Institutional Order. Discourse in Medical, Mediation and Management Settings / [ed] Srikant Sarangi, Celia Roberts, Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter , 1999Chapter in book (Other academic)
  • 8.
    Forstorp, Per-Anders
    et al.
    Linköping University, The Tema Institute. Linköping University, Faculty of Arts and Sciences.
    Linell, PerLinköping University, The Tema Institute, Department of Communications Studies. Linköping University, Faculty of Arts and Sciences.
    Samtal pågår: dialogiska perspektiv på svenska mediedebatter1998Collection (editor) (Other academic)
  • 9.
    Hoffmann, Mikael
    et al.
    Linköping University, Department of Medical and Health Sciences, Clinical Pharmacology. Linköping University, Faculty of Health Sciences.
    Linell, Per
    Linköping University, Department of Culture and Communication. Linköping University, Faculty of Arts and Sciences.
    Lindh-Åstrand, Lotta
    Linköping University, Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Obstetrics and gynecology. Linköping University, Faculty of Health Sciences.
    Kjellgren, Karin I.
    Faculty of Health and Caring Sciences, Institute of Nursing, The Sahlgrenska Academy at Göteborg University, Göteborg, Sweden.
    Risk talk: rhetorical strategies in consultations on hormone replacement therap2005In: Health, Risk and Society, ISSN 1369-8575, E-ISSN 1469-8331, Vol. 5, no 2, p. 139-154Article in journal (Refereed)
    Abstract [en]

    When analysing risk discussions in medical settings it is important to consider the specific activity type. In this qualitative study 20 first-time consultations by healthy women regarding hormone replacement therapy (HRT) in the menopause the risk discussion is asymmetrical with the doctors dominating. Despite being set up as a specific opportunity for women in the menopause to discuss problems and risks, it comes forth as a decision-making activity in a traditional medical setting. The consultations fulfil to a high extent the demands for informed decision making, but the risk discussions are recontextualised into a cost-benefit discourse with a typical implicit quantitative bias. The doctors use several different rhetorical strategies such as positive introduction of HRT, embedding drawbacks in positive introductions and/or exits thereby diminishing them. The word risk is avoided to a considerable extent and the term 'drawbacks' is used instead. The most obvious strategy is to move from the woman's symptoms to aspects of prevention, thus changing the discussion from the menopause and different strategies to cope with menopausal problems into a medically oriented discussion of pharmacological treatment alternatives. The 'change of life' in these talks is entirely conceptualised within a 'medical model'.

  • 10.
    Keselman, Olga
    et al.
    Linköping University, The Swedish Institute for Disability Research. Linköping University, Department of Behavioural Sciences and Learning, Disability Research. Linköping University, Faculty of Arts and Sciences.
    Cederborg, Ann-Christin
    Linköping University, The Swedish Institute for Disability Research. Linköping University, Department of Behavioural Sciences and Learning, Disability Research. Linköping University, Faculty of Arts and Sciences.
    Linell, Per
    Linköping University, Department of Culture and Communication. Linköping University, Faculty of Arts and Sciences.
    That is not necessary for you to know!: Negotiation of participation status of unaccompanied children in interpreter-mediated asylum hearings2010In: International Journal of Research and Practice in Interpreting, ISSN 1384-6647, Vol. 12, no 1, p. 83-104Article in journal (Refereed)
    Abstract [en]

    This article is a study of how the participation status of asylum-seeking children is interactively constructed in interpreter-mediated asylum hearings. We have undertaken a discourse analysis of 50 non-repair side-sequences from 26 hearings with Russian-speaking, asylum-seeking children in Sweden. A side-sequence is here defined as a monolingual sequence conducted in only one of the languages involved in the interviews. It involves the interpreter and only one of the primary interlocutors. In this article, four extracts are chosen for a micro-analysis in order to elucidate how interpreters can challenge asylum-seeking children’s participant statuses. We show that the right of the child to make his or her voice heard can be challenged, especially when the interpreters exclude, distort, discredit and guide the voices of the children, which is often done with the tacit approval of caseworkers.

  • 11.
    Korolija, Natascha
    et al.
    Linköping University, The Tema Institute. Linköping University, Faculty of Arts and Sciences.
    Linell, Per
    Linköping University, Department of Culture and Communication. Linköping University, Faculty of Arts and Sciences.
    Episodes: coding and analyzing coherence in multiparty conversation1996In: Journal of Linguistics, ISSN 0022-2267, E-ISSN 1469-7742, Vol. 34, no 4, p. 799-831Article in journal (Refereed)
    Abstract [en]

    Episodes in Conversatum are topically and interactionally defined. They are boundaried sequences at a structually intermediate level, that is, above the level of utterance/turn but below that of the whofe encounter and its major phases. We argue that episodes and topics are equally basic tp conversations.

    The initiation of a newepisode involes, per definition, the introtiuction of something new. On the oter hand, episode initiation.! are systematically dependent on lextual and contextual resorces that speakers take as given, when  - in the interaction - they guide their interlocutors into doing or talking about sornething new. This poper presents the fundamentals of a modef ofepisode structure and its relations to contextual resources. It also outlines a method, topical episode analysis, for coding and analyzing coherence in terms of episode structure in (especially mu!tiparty) conversation.

  • 12.
    Lindström, Jan
    et al.
    Nordiska språk Helsingfors universitet.
    Linell, Per
    Linköping University, Faculty of Arts and Sciences. Linköping University, Department of Culture and Communication.
    X-och-x som samtalspraktik och grammatisk konstruktion2007In: Interaktion och kontext, Lund: Studentlitteratur , 2007, p. 19-89Chapter in book (Other academic)
  • 13.
    Linell, Per
    Linköping University, Department of Thematic Studies, Department of Communications Studies. Linköping University, Faculty of Arts and Sciences.
    Approaching dialogue: talk, interaction and contexts in dialogical perspectives1998Book (Other academic)
    Abstract [en]

    Approaching Dialogue has its primary focus on the theoretical understanding and empirical analysis of talk-in-interaction. It deals with conversation in general as well as talk within institutions against a backdrop of Conversation Analysis, context-based discourse analysis, social pragmatics, socio-cultural theory and interdisciplinary dialogue analysis.

    People’s communicative projects, and the structures and functions of talk-in-interaction, are analyzed from the most local sequences to the comprehensive communicative activity types and genres. A second aim of the book is to explore the possibilities and limitations of dialogism as a general epistemology for cognition and communication. On this point, it portrays the dialogical approach as a major alternative to the mainstream theories of cognition as individually-based information processing, communication as information transfer, and language as a code. Stressing aspects of interaction, joint construction and cultural embeddedness, and drawing upon extensive theoretical and empirical research carried out in different traditions, this book aims at an integrating synthesis. It is largely interdisciplinary in nature, and has been written in such a way that it can be used at advanced undergraduate courses in linguistics, sociopragmatics of language, communication studies, sociology, social psychology and cognitive science.

  • 14.
    Linell, Per
    Linköping University, Faculty of Arts and Sciences. Linköping University, The Tema Institute, Department of Communications Studies.
    Bara prat? Om socialkonstruktivismen som vanställande och vanställd2006In: Det vanställda ordet: om den svåra konsten att värna sin integritet / [ed] Martin Kylhammar och Jean-François Battail, Stockholm: Carlssons , 2006, 1, p. 152-193Chapter in book (Other academic)
    Abstract [sv]

    Boken handlar om den svåra konsten att värna sin personliga integritet i förhållande till modernitetens centrala maktinstitutioner: masskomm unikation, vetenskap och politik. Boken diskuterar och analyserar vår utsatthet i det moderna. Ytterst gäller denna diskussion den moderna d emokratins grundfrågor. En rad framstående forskare medverkar.

  • 15.
    Linell, Per
    Linköping University, Department of Culture and Communication. Linköping University, Faculty of Arts and Sciences.
    Communicative Activity Types as Organisations in Discourses and Discourses in Organisations2010In: Discourses in Interaction / [ed] Tanskanen, S-K, Helasvuo, M-L, Johansson, M & Raitaniemi, M, Amsterdam: John Benjamins , 2010, p. 33-59Chapter in book (Other academic)
    Abstract [en]

    The fourteen contributions in this collection come from different approaches in pragmatics, interactional linguistics, conversation analysis, discourse analysis and dialogue analysis; the name given to what is studied ranges from spoken language and conversation to interaction, dialogue, discourse and communication. What the articles have in common is a similar starting point: they are informed by a form of linguistic understanding which has emerged within what could be called the interactional turn. The materials investigated come from several different languages, representing a variety of interactions: private and public, written and spoken, historical and present-day. While studies of such diverse materials naturally differ in their starting points, goals and aims, engaging them in a dialogue can help reveal where old beliefs may be challenged and new understandings may emerge. The interactional approaches to discourse presented in this volume show that there are several discourses on interaction: interconnected, parallel, but also varying and even divergent

  • 16.
    Linell, Per
    Linköping University, Faculty of Arts and Sciences. Linköping University, Department of Culture and Communication.
    Dialogicality in languages, minds and brains: is there a convergence between dialogism and neuro-biology?2007In: Language sciences (Oxford), ISSN 0388-0001, E-ISSN 1873-5746, Vol. 29, no 5, p. 605-620Article in journal (Refereed)
    Abstract [en]

    The aim of this contribution is to take a number of key notions in dialogical theory, and look for their possible counterparts in recent neuroscience. This comprises points like other-orientation, relationism and context-interdependence, embodiment of language, responsive understanding, potentialities, unfinalisability, implicitness and degrees of awareness, and redundancy of processing. The conclusion is that there is indeed an incipient convergence between neuro-biology and cognitive dynamics, on the one hand, and dialogism on the other. A general dialogical framework has something to offer to cognitive science and evolutionary psychology, not in the least because dialogue and dialogical interaction appear to be more fundamental than language (at least as language has been conceived most often). Brains are complex organisms coordinating the apperception of and interventions into the world, rather than producing and processing agency-free representations of the world. © 2007 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

  • 17.
    Linell, Per
    Linköping University, Faculty of Arts and Sciences. Linköping University, Department of Culture and Communication.
    Dialogism and Social Constructivism2007In: Det enkla är det sköna - en vänbok till Kjell Granström / [ed] Charlotta Einarsson,Granström, Kjell, Linköping: Linköpings universitet , 2007, p. 85-93Chapter in book (Other academic)
    Abstract [sv]

    Om språkutveckling / Jan Anward -- Forskningsmiljöer och seminariekulturer : ideal och verklighet / Gunnar Berg -- Gruppens obönhörliga brist på demokrati / Gunnel Colnerud -- Undervisningsspråket : en del av lärares yrkesspråk / Anna-Lena Eriksson Gustavsson, Rose-Marie Fahlén, Ulla-Britt Persson & Joakim Samuelsson -- Dialogism and social constructivism / Per Linell -- Samhällsaktiva skolor och skolaktiva samhällen i glesbygd : utopi eller möjlighet? / Annika Andræ Thelin -- Användningen av tiden i skolan / Mats Ekholm -- Offensiva spelare och coacher i matchen om skolan / Lennart Fahlén, Elisabeth Ahlstrand, Ingrid Westlund & Leif Mideklint -- Analyser av skolors anda / Rolf Lander -- Samhällsförändring, skolprofilering och identitet / Lars Naeslund & Jens Pedersen -- Succession and managing the transition from predecessor to successor / Siv Boalt Boëthius -- Freud som gruppsykolog : en orättvis betraktelse till 150-årsdagen / Stefan Jern -- Gruppens känslomässiga klimat / Eric Olsson -- Från Göteborg till Dortmund : studier i masshändelser / Michael Rosander & Ingrid Hylander -- Gruppetenking og operativ effektivitet i team / Endre Sjøvold -- Existens och relationer / Dan Stiwne -- Är det bra att vara ambitiös? / Viveka Adelswärd och Johan Hofvendahl -- Ja, för jag är så jävla snygg!" : retsekvenser och informellt lärande i högstadiets grupparbeten / Karin Aronsson & Michael Tholander -- Skolpsykolog : beprövad erfarenhet och specialitet på vetenskaplig grund? / Gunilla Guvå & Ingrid Hylander -- Slump, sammanträffanden och spår : om en lärares inflytande / Stefan Jern & Anders Hempel -- Villkor för psykologisk forskning : hur de statliga forskningsråden fördelade sina pengar inom psykologiområdet 1996-98 / Rolf Sandell och Kjell Granström -- Urval publikationer Kjell Granström. Svensk engelsk och norsk text.

  • 18.
    Linell, Per
    Linköping University, Faculty of Arts and Sciences. Linköping University, The Tema Institute, Department of Communications Studies.
    Discourse across boundaries: On recontextualizations and the blending of voices in professional discourse1998In: Text & talk : an interdisciplinary journal of language, discourse & communication studies, ISSN 1860-7330, Vol. 18, no 2, p. 143-157Article in journal (Refereed)
  • 19.
    Linell, Per
    Linköping University, Department of Thematic Studies, Department of Communications Studies. Linköping University, Faculty of Arts and Sciences.
    Dynamics of discourse or stability of structure: Sociolinguistics and the legacy from linguistics2001In: Sociolinguistics and social theory / [ed] Nikolas Coupland, Srikant Sarangi and Christopher N. Candlin, Harlow: Longman, 2001, 1, p. 107-126Chapter in book (Other academic)
    Abstract [en]

    The empirical and descriptive strengths of sociolinguistics, developed over more than 40 years of research, have not been matched by an active engagement with theory. Yet, over this time, social theorising has taken important new turns, linked in many ways to linguistic and discursive concerns. Sociolinguistics and Social Theory is the first book to explore the interface between sociolinguistic analysis and modern social theory. The book sets out to reunite sociolinguistics with the concepts and perspectives of several of the most influential modern theorists of society and social action, including Bakhtin, Foucault, Habermas, Sacks, Goffman, Bourdieu and Giddens. In eleven newly commissioned chapters, leading sociolinguists reappraise the theoretical framing of their research, reaching out beyond conventional limits. The authors propose significant new orientations to key sociolinguistic themes, including- - social motivations for language variation and change - language, power and authority - language and ageing - language, race and class - language planning In substantial introductory and concluding chapters, the editors and invited discussants reassess the boundaries of sociolinguistic theory and the priorities of sociolinguistic methods. Sociolinguistics and Social Theory encourages students and researchers of sociolinguistics to be more reflexively aware and critical of the social bases of their analyses and invites a reasessment of the place sociolinguistics occupies in the social sciences generally.

  • 20.
    Linell, Per
    Linköping University, Faculty of Arts and Sciences. Linköping University, The Tema Institute, Department of Communications Studies.
    En dialogisk grammatik?2005In: Samtal och grammatik - studier i svenskt samtalsspråk / [ed] Jan Anward & Bengt Nordberg, Lund: Studentlitteratur , 2005, 1, p. 231-328Chapter in book (Other academic)
    Abstract [sv]

    Samtalsspråkets grammatik, finns den? Frågan kan tyckas överraskande, men för de flesta människor är grammatik förknippat med skriftspråk och med skolans språkundervisning. Den traditionella grammatikforskningen har mestadels byggt på skriftspråket. Den här boken vill visa att också det fritt flödande, oreflekterade talet i dialoger och flerpartssamtal följer grammatiska regler, även om dessa delvis är av annan art och framsprungna ur andra praktiker än skriftspråkets. Syftet med boken är att beskriva strategiskt valda, återkommande grammatiska strukturer som kan bilda underlag för fortsatta talspråksgrammatiska studier.

  • 21.
    Linell, Per
    Linköping University, Department of Culture and Communication. Linköping University, Faculty of Arts and Sciences.
    Grammatical Constructions in Dialogue2009In: Context and Constructions / [ed] Alexander Bergs & Gabriela Diewald, Amsterdam: John Benjamins , 2009, 1, p. 97-110Chapter in book (Other academic)
    Abstract [en]

    This collection of original articles focuses on the function, role, and structure of linguistic and extralinguistic “context(s)” in relation to the notion of “constructions” and in construction grammar. It thus takes up and brings together two equally complex concepts of linguistics, which both encompass structural as well as pragmatic and discourse-oriented aspects. Although both notions – contexts as well as constructions – have been under intense discussion in linguistics during the last decades with a wide span of research interests, integrative studies of these aspects have been largely missing.

    The eight papers presented in this volume explore the possibilities and risks of integrating context(s) into particular constructions and construction grammar in general. Topics range from particular language and construction-specific problems such as the "polysemy" of modal verbs in relation to context-sensitive constructions, to general technical analyses and proposals, including proposals for formalizing contextual features in constructional representations.

    The volume will be of interest to scholars and advanced undergraduates interested in linguistic theory in general and in constructional, pragmatic and discourse-analytic approaches in particular.

  • 22.
    Linell, Per
    Linköping University, Faculty of Arts and Sciences. Linköping University, The Tema Institute, Department of Communications Studies.
    Jan Svennevig: Getting Acquainted in Conversation2002In: Norsk lingvistisk tidsskrift, ISSN 0800-3076, E-ISSN 2387-6719, Vol. 20, no 2, p. 113-118Article in journal (Other academic)
  • 23.
    Linell, Per
    Linköping University, Faculty of Arts and Sciences. Linköping University, The Tema Institute, Department of Communications Studies.
    Lindström, Anna: Language as social action. Grammar, prosody, and interaction in Swedish conversation (1999).2000In: Språk & Stil, ISSN 1101-1165, Vol. 9, p. 179-183Article in journal (Other academic)
  • 24.
    Linell, Per
    Linköping University, The Tema Institute, Department of Communications Studies. Linköping University, Faculty of Arts and Sciences.
    Modeller och metaforer för kommunikation1982Book (Other academic)
    Abstract [sv]

    Den text som publiceras här som SIC 1 är en nlgot utökad version av den  föreläsning som jag höll den 22 april 1982 vid min installation som professor vid temainstitutionen vid universitetet i Linköping.

  • 25.
    Linell, Per
    Linköping University, Faculty of Arts and Sciences. Linköping University, Department of Culture and Communication.
    On Bertau´s and Other Voices2007In: International journal for dialogical sciences, Vol. 2, p. 163-168Article in journal (Refereed)
  • 26.
    Linell, Per
    Linköping University, Faculty of Arts and Sciences. Linköping University, The Tema Institute, Department of Communications Studies.
    Perspectives, implicitness and recontextualization2002In: Perspective and perspectivation in discourse / [ed] Carl Friedrich Graumann and Werner Kallmeyer, Amsterdam, Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publ. Co , 2002, p. 41-57Chapter in book (Other academic)
    Abstract [en]

    This title takes a look at how terms such as "perspective", "viewpoint" and "aspect", words that are frequently used and easily understood, are interrelated, namely, as perspectival terms, or as elements of a perspectival structure.

  • 27.
    Linell, Per
    Linköping University, Department of Culture and Communication. Linköping University, Faculty of Arts and Sciences.
    Pis´mennojazykovaja predvjaztost´ lingvistiki kak nautjnoj otrasli2009In: Studia Linguistica Cognitiva 2: Nauka o jazyke v izmejajusjtjejsja paradigme znanija / [ed] sovet serii A. V. Kravčenko, Irkutsk: BNUEL Publishers , 2009, 1, p. 153-191Chapter in book (Other academic)
  • 28.
    Linell, Per
    Linköping University, Faculty of Arts and Sciences. Linköping University, The Tema Institute, Department of Communications Studies.
    Recontextualising Non-Bakhtinian Theories of Language: A Bakhtinian Analysis.2004In: Bakhtinian Perspectives on Language and Culture.: Meaning in Language, Art and New Media. / [ed] Finn Bostad, Basingstoke: Palgrave , 2004, p. 114-132Chapter in book (Other academic)
    Abstract [en]

    In this multi-disciplinary volume, comprising the work of several established scholars from different countries, central concepts associated with the work of the Bakhtin Circle are interrogated in relation to intellectual history, language theory and an understanding of new media. The book will prove an important resource for those interested in the ideas of the Bakhtin Circle, but also for those attempting to develop a coherent theoretical approach to language in use and problems of meaning production in new media.

  • 29.
    Linell, Per
    Linköping University, Department of Culture and Communication. Linköping University, Faculty of Arts and Sciences.
    Rethinking Language, Mind and World Dialogically: Interactional and contextual theories of human sense-making2009 (ed. 1)Book (Other academic)
    Abstract [en]

    A volume in Advances in Cultural PsychologySeries Editor: Jaan Valsiner, Clark University"This is a remarkable and highly original work on dialogism, dialogical theories and dialogue. With his erudite and broadly based scholarship PerLinell makes a path-breaking contribution to the study of the human mind, presenting a novel alternative to traditional monologism and exploring thedynamics of sense-making in different forms of interaction and communicative projects. Although Per Linell discusses complex dialogical concepts, the text is written with exceptional clarity, taking the reader through critique as well as appreciation of great intellectual traditions of our time."(Professor Ivana Markov, University of Stirling, U.K.)"Per Linells Rethinking Language, Mind And World Dialogically represents a landmark in the development ofa transdisciplinary dialogically basedparadigm for the human sciences. The author?'s lucid analysis and constructive rethinking ranges all the way from integrating explanations ofsignificant empirical contributions across the entire range of human sciences dealing with language, thought and communication to foundational, epistemological and ontological issues."(Professor Ragnar Rommetveit, University of Oslo, Norway)Per Linell took his degree in linguistics and is currently professor of language and culture, with a specialisation on communication and spokeninteraction, at the University of Link ping, Sweden. He has been instrumental in building up an internationally renowned interdisciplinary graduateschool in communication studies in Link ping. He has worked for many years on developing a dialogical alternative to mainstream theories inlinguistics, psychology and social sciences. His production comprises more than 100 articles on dialogue, talk-in-interaction and institutionaldiscourse. His more recent books include Approaching Dialogue (1998), The Written Language Bias in Linguistics (2005) and Dialogue in FocusGroups (2007, with I. Markov, M. Grossen and A. Salazar Orvig).

  • 30.
    Linell, Per
    Linköping University, Faculty of Arts and Sciences. Linköping University, The Tema Institute, Department of Communications Studies.
    Samhället som samtal2005In: Tvärsnitt, ISSN 0348-7997, Vol. 4, p. 35-37Article in journal (Other (popular science, discussion, etc.))
  • 31.
    Linell, Per
    Linköping University, Department of Culture and Communication, Language and Culture. Linköping University, Faculty of Arts and Sciences.
    Samtalskulturer: kommunikativa verksamhetstyper i samhället. Vol. 1 och 22011Book (Other academic)
    Abstract [sv]

    Per Linell har, tillsammans med medarbetare och kolleger, arbetat under lång tid med samtal, särskilt sådana som hör hemma i institutioner och professioner och deras kontakter med klienter. I de två volymerna om Samtalskulturer ligger fokus främst på sådana institutionella samtal, men böck~rna ger även ett samhälleligt förankrat perspektiv på samtal och kommunikation i allmänhet. Samtalskulturer vänder sig både till samhällsvetare med intresse för interaktionen mellan människor och tillspråkvetare med specialisering på språkets och språkandets roll i samhällslivet.

  • 32.
    Linell, Per
    Linköping University, Faculty of Arts and Sciences. Linköping University, The Tema Institute, Department of Communications Studies.
    Sju kartesianska dikotomier2000In: Creative Crossroads - Electronic Honorary Publication Dedicated to Yvonne Wærn on Her Retirement, Linköping: Tema Kommunikation, Linköpings universitet , 2000Chapter in book (Other academic)
  • 33.
    Linell, Per
    Linköping University, Department of Culture and Communication, Language and Culture. Linköping University, Faculty of Arts and Sciences.
    Språkande: samtal, språk och grammatik2011Book (Other academic)
    Abstract [sv]

    Per Linell disputerade i allmän språkvetenskap (Uppsala, 1974) och har varit professor vid Linköpings universitet, först vid tema Kommunikation 1981-2005 och därefter i språk och kultur 2006-2011. Han har fått internationellt erkännande för sina bidrag till "dialogiska" teorier om människors meningsskapande i kommunikation och tänkande. Sådana teorier betonar hur man som sarntalare, författare, tänkare och praktiker är beroende av andra personer, av kontexter och interaktioner. På detta område har Linell publicerat böcker som Approaching Dialogue (Amsterdam, 1998) och Rethinking Language, Mind and World Dialogically (Charlotte, NC, 2009). I boken The Written Language Bias in Linguistics (London, 2005) analyserar han utförligt skriftspråksorienteringen i språkvetenskapen. Han har arbetat med samtal av många olika slag och analyserat deras funktioner i samhället. Det gäller särskilt samtal i institutioner och professioner (Samtalskulturer, Linköping, 2011). I boken Språkande har han samlat olika uppsatser om grammatiken i verkliga yttranden i samtal.

  • 34.
    Linell, Per
    Linköping University, Faculty of Arts and Sciences. Linköping University, The Tema Institute, Department of Communications Studies.
    The Written Language Bias in Linguistics1982Book (Other academic)
    Abstract [en]

    For some time I have been thinking of the predicament of present-day linguistics in terms of what I venture to call "the written language bias". It seems to me that a great number of our explicit or implicit theories, our methods and preferences are heavily influenced by the very long traditions of analyzing mainly, or only, certain kinds of written language. Even when we are in fact focussing on spoken language, we seem to approach it with a theoretical apparatus which is more apt for the analysisof written language. This essay represents a first attempt on my part to systematize some thoughts about this. I hope that it will stimulate discussion and lead to constructive criticism.

    This bock was largely written in t he academic year 1980/81 when I was employed by the Swedish Research Council for the Humanities and Social Sciences. When I worked at it, I profited from many ideas and suggestions of other people. Among these schalars I want to single out two, Jens Allwood and Ragnar Ronunetveit, with whom I had many inspiring discussions.

  • 35.
    Linell, Per
    Linköping University, Faculty of Arts and Sciences. Linköping University, The Tema Institute, Department of Communications Studies.
    The Written Language Bias in Linguistics: Its Nature, Origins, and Transformations2005Book (Other academic)
    Abstract [en]

    Linguists routinely emphasise the primacy of speech over writing. Yet, most linguists have analysed spoken language, as well as language in general, applying theories and methods that are best suited for written language. Accordingly, there is an extensive 'written language bias' in traditional and present day linguistics and other language sciences. In this book, this point is argued with rich and convincing evidence from virtually all fields of linguistics

  • 36.
    Linell, Per
    Linköping University, The Tema Institute, Department of Communications Studies. Linköping University, Faculty of Arts and Sciences.
    Towards a dialogical linguistics2006In: Proceedings of the XII International Bakhtin Conference, Jyväskylä, Finland, 18–22 July, 2005 / [ed] Mika Lähteenmäki, Hannele Dufva, Sirpa Leppänen & Piia Varis, Jyväskylä: University of Jyväskylä , 2006, p. 157-172Conference paper (Other academic)
    Abstract [en]

    Mainstream linguistics has always been relatively ‘monologistic’ in nature. By contrast, a dialogical (‘dialogistic’) linguistics would systematically consider the subject’s relation to the other in interaction and in contexts. This article makes some suggestions concerning what such a linguistics could contain. Two phenomena are discussed in more detail: grammatical constructions with their outer syntax and lexical items with their meaning potentials. This is done with reference to Swedish data, in particular a grammatical construction called x-and-x, the syntax and semantics of which are explored.

  • 37.
    Linell, Per
    Linköping University, The Tema Institute, Department of Communications Studies. Linköping University, Faculty of Arts and Sciences.
    Är kommunikationsvetenskapen ett ämne?1999In: Möten : en vänbok till Roger Säljö / [ed] Ullabeth Sätterlund Larsson, Kerstin Bergqvist, Linköping: Tema K, Linköpings universitet , 1999, p. 355-374Chapter in book (Other academic)
  • 38.
    Linell, Per
    et al.
    Linköping University, The Tema Institute, Department of Communications Studies. Linköping University, Faculty of Arts and Sciences.
    Adelswärd, VivekaLinköping University, The Tema Institute, Department of Communications Studies. Linköping University, Faculty of Arts and Sciences.Nilsson, TorbjörnLinköping University, The Tema Institute, Department of Communications Studies. Linköping University, Faculty of Arts and Sciences.Pettersson, Per A.Linköping University, The Tema Institute, Department of Communications Studies. Linköping University, Faculty of Arts and Sciences.
    Svenskans beskrivning, 16. Volym 1: Förhandlingar vid sammankomst för att dryfta frågor rörande svenskans beskrivning, Linköping den 22-23 oktober 19871987Conference proceedings (editor) (Other academic)
    Abstract [sv]

    Sextonde sammankomsten för svenskans beskrivning hölls i Linköping den 22 och 23 oktober 1987. Värdinstitutioner var Institutionen för Språk och Litteratur och Tema Kommunikation.

    Sammankomstens huvudtema var svenska språket i bruk, men i enlighet med traditionen var även andra områden inom forskningen kring svenskan företrädda. Antalet deltagare var c:a 175, och sammanlagt 38 föredrag hölls, varav tre plenarföreläsningar. Tre bidrag (Linda Jönsson: Polisrapporten - en skriven berättelse på talets grund, Godelieve Laureys: Rörelseverb i svenskan och holländskan och Tomas Riad: Reflexivitet och predikation) kommer att publiceras på annat sätt, medan övriga 35 bidrag finns i de två volymer som här föreligger.

    Organisationskommitten bestod, utom av utgivarna, av Mats Arwidson och Marianne Axelson. Vi tackar dem varmt för allt deras arbete före, under och efter sammankomsten. För hjälp med redigeringen vill vi tacka Elisabeth Andersson och Lotta Strand. Vi vill också framföra ett tack till Stiftelsen Tornbylyckorna-Lektorshagen i Linköping som gav ekonomiskt stöd till sammankomsten. Tryckningen av konferensvolymerna har möjliggjorts genom bidrag från HSFR (F 753/88).

  • 39.
    Linell, Per
    et al.
    Linköping University, The Tema Institute, Department of Communications Studies. Linköping University, Faculty of Arts and Sciences.
    Adelswärd, VivekaLinköping University, The Tema Institute, Department of Communications Studies. Linköping University, Faculty of Arts and Sciences.Nilsson, TorbjörnLinköping University, The Tema Institute, Department of Communications Studies. Linköping University, Faculty of Arts and Sciences.Pettersson, Per A.Linköping University, The Tema Institute, Department of Communications Studies. Linköping University, Faculty of Arts and Sciences.
    Svenskans beskrivning, 16. Volym 2: Förhandlingar vid sammankomst för att dryfta frågor rörande svenskans beskrivning, Linköping den 22-23 oktober 19871987Conference proceedings (editor) (Other academic)
    Abstract [sv]

    Sextonde sammankomsten för svenskans beskrivning hölls i Linköping den 22 och 23 oktober 1987. Värdinstitutioner var Institutionen för Språk och Litteratur och Tema Kommunikation.

    Sammankomstens huvudtema var svenska språket i bruk, men i enlighet med traditionen var även andra områden inom forskningen kring svenskan företrädda. Antalet deltagare var c:a 175, och sammanlagt 38 föredrag hölls, varav tre plenarföreläsningar. Tre bidrag (Linda Jönsson: Polisrapporten - en skriven berättelse på talets grund, Godelieve Laureys: Rörelseverb i svenskan och holländskan och Tomas Riad: Reflexivitet och predikation) kommer att publiceras på annat sätt, medan övriga 35 bidrag finns i de två volymer som här föreligger.

    Organisationskommitten bestod, utom av utgivarna, av Mats Arwidson och Marianne Axelson. Vi tackar dem varmt för allt deras arbete före, under och efter sammankomsten. För hjälp med redigeringen vill vi tacka Elisabeth Andersson och Lotta Strand. Vi vill också framföra ett tack till Stiftelsen Tornbylyckorna-Lektorshagen i Linköping som gav ekonomiskt stöd till sammankomsten. Tryckningen av konferensvolymerna har möjliggjorts genom bidrag från HSFR (F 753/88).

  • 40.
    Linell, Per
    et al.
    Linköping University, Faculty of Arts and Sciences. Linköping University, Department of Culture and Communication.
    Adelswärd, Viveka
    Linköping University, Faculty of Arts and Sciences. Linköping University, Department of Science and Technology, Communications and Transport Systems.
    Sachs, Lisbeth
    Linköping University, Faculty of Arts and Sciences. Linköping University, The Tema Institute.
    Bredmar, Margareta
    Linköping University, Faculty of Arts and Sciences. Linköping University, Department of Behavioural Sciences and Learning, Sociology .
    Lindstedt, U
    Linkoping Univ, Dept Commun Studies, SE-58183 Linkoping, Sweden Jonkoping Univ, Univ Coll Hlth Sci, Jonkoping, Sweden.
    Expert talk in medical contexts: Explicit and implicit orientation to risks2002In: Research on Language and Social Interaction, ISSN 0835-1813, E-ISSN 1532-7973, Vol. 35, no 2, p. 195-218Article in journal (Refereed)
    Abstract [en]

    In medical contexts, parties often have reasons to focus on risks: risks of developing diseases or of having children with congenital diseases, risks involved in taking drugs or in using a particular type of therapy, and so forth. In such risk-implicative contexts, doctors and nurses deal with the risk topics sometimes directly, at other times quite indirectly. In this article, we discuss results from studying 5 different health care contexts, We discuss contextual factors that might account for some of the considerable differences in risk talk. Our claim is that the different explicit versus implicit orientations are linked to where and how the different health care experts position themselves vis-A-vis scientific risk formulations and everyday risk perceptions, Our data on the implicit orientations to risk cast doubt on theories of discourse that would hold that all relevant understandings in discourse are made verbally manifest.

  • 41.
    Linell, Per
    et al.
    Linköping University, Faculty of Arts and Sciences. Linköping University, The Tema Institute, Department of Communications Studies.
    Ahrenberg, LarsLinköping University, The Institute of Technology. Linköping University, Department of Computer and Information Science, NLPLAB - Natural Language Processing Laboratory.Jönsson, LindaLinköping University, Department of Language and Culture.
    Samtal och språkanvändning i professionerna : rapport från ASLA1998Collection (editor) (Other academic)
  • 42.
    Linell, Per
    et al.
    Linköping University, Faculty of Arts and Sciences. Linköping University, Department of Thematic Studies, Department of Communications Studies.
    Aronsson, KarinLinköping University, Faculty of Arts and Sciences. Linköping University, Department of Thematic Studies, Department of Child Studies.
    Jagen och rösterna: Goffman, Viveka och samtalet : texter till Viveka Adelswärd den 17 mars 20022002Collection (editor) (Other academic)
    Abstract [sv]

    I den här boken har vi samlat ett antal texter skrivna av forskare som på olika sätt haft förmånen att samarbeta med och stå i dialog med Viveka Adelswärd. Den omedelbara anledningen är att vi alla vill hylla Viveka när hon den 17 mars 2002 fyller 60 år. Vi gör det som representanter för mycket vida kretsar av kollegor och forskare som fått ta del av Vivekas kunskaper, engagemang och vänskap i den akademiska världen, i Sverige, i Norden och internationellt.

  • 43.
    Linell, Per
    et al.
    Linköping University, Faculty of Arts and Sciences. Linköping University, Department of Thematic Studies, Department of Communications Studies.
    Bredmar, Margareta
    Linköping University, Department of Behavioural Sciences.
    Reconstructing topical sensitivity: aspects of face-work in talks between midwives and expectant mothers1996In: Research on language and social interaction., ISSN 0835-1813, Vol. 29, no 4, p. 347-379Article in journal (Other academic)
  • 44.
    Linell, Per
    et al.
    Linköping University, The Tema Institute, Department of Communications Studies. Linköping University, Faculty of Arts and Sciences.
    Gustavsson, Lennart
    Linköping University, The Tema Institute, Department of Communications Studies. Linköping University, Faculty of Arts and Sciences.
    Initiativ och respons: om dialogens dynamik, dominans och koherens1987Book (Other academic)
  • 45.
    Linell, Per
    et al.
    Linköping University, Department of Culture and Communication. Linköping University, Faculty of Arts and Sciences.
    Keselman, Olga
    Linköping University, The Swedish Institute for Disability Research. Linköping University, Department of Behavioural Sciences and Learning, Disability Research. Linköping University, Faculty of Arts and Sciences.
    Trustworthiness at stake: Trust and distrust ininvestigative interviews with Russian adolescent asylum-seekers in Sweden2010In: Trust and Conflict: Representation, culture and dialogue. Submitted to series Cultural dynamics of social representation / [ed] I. Marková, I. and A. Gillespie, Routledge , 2010, p. 240-Chapter in book (Other academic)
    Abstract [en]

    Trust, distrust and conflict between social groups have existed throughout the history of humankind, although their forms have changed. Using three main concepts: culture, representation and dialogue, this book explores and re-thinks some of these changes in relation to concrete historical and contemporary events. Part I offers a symbolic and historical analysis of trust and distrust while Parts II and III examine trust, distrust and conflict in specific events including the Cyprus conflict, Estonian collective memories, coping with HIV/AIDS in China, Swedish asylum seekers, the Cuban missile crisis and Stalinist confessions. With an impressive array of international contributors the chapters draw on a number of key concepts such as self and other, ingroup and outgroup, contact between groups, categorization, brinkmanship, knowledge, beliefs and myth.  Trust and Conflict offers a fresh perspective on the problems that arise from treating trust, distrust and conflict as simplified indicators. Instead, it proposes that human and social sciences can view these phenomena within the complex matrix of interacting perspectives and meta-perspectives that characterise the social world. As such it will be of interest to undergraduates, postgraduates and lecturers of human and social sciences especially social psychology, sociology, political science and communication studies.

  • 46.
    Linell, Per
    et al.
    Linköping University, Department of Thematic Studies, Department of Communications Studies. Linköping University, Faculty of Arts and Sciences.
    Korolija, Natascha
    Linköping University, Department of Thematic Studies, Department of Communications Studies. Linköping University, Faculty of Arts and Sciences.
    Berättandets sammanhang: samtal på ett dagcenter för äldre2002In: Jagen och rösterna: Goffman, Viveka och samtalet : texter till Viveka Adelswärd den 17 mars 2002 = Selves and voices : Goffman, Viveka and dialogue / [ed] Per Linell och Karin Aronsson, Linköping: Linköping University Electronic Press , 2002, p. 151-162Chapter in book (Other academic)
  • 47.
    Linell, Per
    et al.
    Linköping University, The Tema Institute, Department of Communications Studies. Linköping University, Faculty of Arts and Sciences.
    Korolija, Natascha
    Linköping University, The Tema Institute, Department of Communications Studies. Linköping University, Faculty of Arts and Sciences.
    Coherence in multi-party conversation: Episodes and contexts in interaction1997In: Conversation: Cognitive, communicative and social perspectives / [ed] Talmy Givón, Amsterdam ; Philadelphia: John Benjamins , 1997, p. 167-205Chapter in book (Other academic)
    Abstract [en]

    (from the cover) The papers in this volume cover face-to-face communication from a variety of perspectives: social, cultural, cognitive and communicative. Our aim for this volume has been to challenge some of the prevailing dichotomies in discourse studies: First, the cleavage between the study of information flow and the study of social interaction. Second, the theoretical division between speech-situation models and cognitive models. Third, the methodological split between the study of spontaneous conversation in natural context and the study of speech production and comprehension under controlled experimental conditions. And fourth, the rigid genre distinction between narrative and conversational discourse. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2012 APA, all rights reserved)

  • 48.
    Linell, Per
    et al.
    Linköping University, Department of Culture and Communication. Linköping University, Faculty of Arts and Sciences.
    Korolija, Natascha
    Linköping University, The Tema Institute. Linköping University, Faculty of Arts and Sciences.
    On the division of communicative labour within episodes in aphasic discourse1995In: International Journal of Psycholinguistics, ISSN 0165-4055, Vol. 11, no 2, p. 143-165Article in journal (Refereed)
  • 49.
    Linell, Per
    et al.
    Språk och kultur IKK.
    Linell, Per
    Linköping University, Faculty of Arts and Sciences. Linköping University, The Tema Institute, Department of Communications Studies.
    Can We Formalise the Linguistic Resources of Interactional Language2006In: SKY Journal of Linguistics, ISSN 1456-8438, E-ISSN 1796-279X, Vol. 19, p. 56-65Article in journal (Other academic)
  • 50.
    Linell, Per
    et al.
    Linköping University, Department of Culture and Communication, Language and Culture. Linköping University, Faculty of Arts and Sciences.
    Mertzlufft, Christine
    Albert-Ludwigs-Universität Freiburg, Deutsches Seminar, Germanistische Linguistik, Germany.
    Evidence for a dialogical grammar: reactive constructions in swedish and german2014In: Grammar and dialogism: sequential, syntactic, and prosodic patterns between emergence and sedimentation / [ed] Susanne Günthner, Wolfgang Imo and Jörg Bücker, Berlin: Walter de Gruyter, 2014, p. 79-108Chapter in book (Refereed)
    Abstract [en]

    The present chapter deals with reactive constructions in Swedish and German, especially with two constructions which will be called x-och/und-x (i.e. x-and-x) and 'double initial auxiliaries' (= DIA) constructions. As reactive constructions we define constructions involving the speaker's repetition of an expression x used in a prior utterance by another or by the speaker him/herself. This first segment is followed by a negotiation of the situated meaning of x. The function is to react to or against the previous speaker's way of expressing him/herself, his/her use of the expression x.

    Our observations confirm a general view of online languaging ( = 'language use'), that utterances are incrementally built. Moreover, our data show that reactive constructions are evidence for a dynamic and dialogical conception of language and languaging, including grammatical constructions.

12 1 - 50 of 66
CiteExportLink to result list
Permanent link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • oxford
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf