liu.seSearch for publications in DiVA
Change search
Refine search result
1 - 12 of 12
CiteExportLink to result list
Permanent link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • oxford
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Rows per page
  • 5
  • 10
  • 20
  • 50
  • 100
  • 250
Sort
  • Standard (Relevance)
  • Author A-Ö
  • Author Ö-A
  • Title A-Ö
  • Title Ö-A
  • Publication type A-Ö
  • Publication type Ö-A
  • Issued (Oldest first)
  • Issued (Newest first)
  • Created (Oldest first)
  • Created (Newest first)
  • Last updated (Oldest first)
  • Last updated (Newest first)
  • Disputation date (earliest first)
  • Disputation date (latest first)
  • Standard (Relevance)
  • Author A-Ö
  • Author Ö-A
  • Title A-Ö
  • Title Ö-A
  • Publication type A-Ö
  • Publication type Ö-A
  • Issued (Oldest first)
  • Issued (Newest first)
  • Created (Oldest first)
  • Created (Newest first)
  • Last updated (Oldest first)
  • Last updated (Newest first)
  • Disputation date (earliest first)
  • Disputation date (latest first)
Select
The maximal number of hits you can export is 250. When you want to export more records please use the Create feeds function.
  • 1.
    Kowalkowski, Christian
    et al.
    Linköping University, Department of Management and Engineering, Industrial Economics. Linköping University, Faculty of Science & Engineering.
    Sörhammar, David
    Tronvoll, Bård
    Sklyar, Alexey
    Linköping University, Department of Management and Engineering, Industrial Economics. Linköping University, Faculty of Science & Engineering.
    The digital service journey: A service ecosystem perspective2017Conference paper (Refereed)
  • 2. Nenonen, Suvi
    et al.
    Frow, Pennie
    Payne, Adrian
    Sklyar, Alexey
    Linköping University, Department of Management and Engineering, Industrial Economics. Linköping University, Faculty of Science & Engineering.
    Storbacka, Kaj
    The Role of Value Propositions in Market-Shaping Strategies: A Qualitative Comparative Analysis2019Conference paper (Refereed)
  • 3.
    Nenonen, Suvi
    et al.
    Graduate School of Management, Business School, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand.
    Gummerus, Johanna
    Centre for Relationship Marketing and Service Management, Hanken School of Economics, Helsinki, Finland.
    Sklyar, Alexey
    Linköping University, Department of Management and Engineering, Industrial Economics. Linköping University, Faculty of Science & Engineering.
    Game-changers: dynamic capabilities’ influence on service ecosystems2018In: Journal of Service Management, ISSN 1757-5818, E-ISSN 1757-5826, Vol. 29, no 4, p. 569-592Article in journal (Refereed)
    Abstract [en]

    Purpose Service-dominant logic acknowledges that actors can influence how service ecosystems evolve through institutional work, but empirical research is only nascent. This paper advances understanding of ecosystem change by proposing that dynamic capabilities are a special type of operant resources enabling actors to conduct institutional work. Consequently, the purpose of this paper is to explore which dynamic capabilities are associated with proactively influencing service ecosystems. Design/methodology/approach Drawing on service-dominant logic, institutional work and dynamic capabilities, this exploratory study assumes an actor-centric perspective and proposes a conceptual model with a hierarchy of dynamic capabilities as the antecedents for successfully influencing service ecosystems. The research model was tested with survey data using partial least squares structural equation modeling. Findings Among the dynamic capabilities studied, ?visioning? and ?influencing explicit institutions? directly affect ?success in influencing service ecosystems,? whereas ?timing? does so indirectly through ?influencing explicit institutions.? The other dynamic capabilities studied have no significant effect on ?success in influencing service ecosystems.? ?Success in influencing service ecosystems? positively affects the ?increased service ecosystem size and efficiency.? Practical implications In addition to reactively positioning and competing at the marketplace, firms can choose to proactively influence their service ecosystems? size and efficiency. Firms aiming to influence service ecosystems should particularly develop dynamic capabilities related to visioning, timing and influencing explicit institutions. Originality/value This research is the first service-dominant logic investigation of the linkage between the actors? dynamic capabilities and their ability to influence service ecosystems.

  • 4.
    Nenonen, Suvi
    et al.
    Graduate School of Management, University of Auckland, New Zealand.
    Storbacka, Kaj
    Graduate School of Management, University of Auckland, New Zealand.
    Sklyar, Alexey
    Linköping University, Department of Management and Engineering, Industrial Economics. Linköping University, Faculty of Science & Engineering.
    Frow, Pennie
    Department of Marketing, University of Sydney, Australia.
    Payne, Adrian
    School of Marketing, University of New South Wales, Australia.
    Value propositions as market-shaping devices: A qualitative comparative analysis2019In: Industrial Marketing Management, ISSN 0019-8501, E-ISSN 1873-2062Article in journal (Refereed)
    Abstract [en]

    Forward-looking firms are increasingly viewing markets as malleable and plastic systems that can be influenced. Hence, they are engaging in market-shaping to proactively augment existing business opportunities or to create new ones. One of the recurring themes in the emerging market-shaping literature is the importance of value propositions. Consequently, the purpose of this paper is to identify configurations of value proposition characteristics that are effective for focal firms engaging in market-shaping strategies. In our empirical study, we analyze market-shaping actions carried out by 21 case firms using fuzzy-set qualitative comparative analysis. We identify four characteristics of market-shaping value propositions: (1) enhanced resource integration and related support as the core content of market-shaping value propositions, and (2) collaborative value proposing process, (3) systemic and verified value promise, and (4) new representations used in communication as the design characteristics of market-shaping value propositions. Further, we show that even though value propositions can shape markets without displaying all four of these characteristics, none of these characteristics alone can create all the expected outcomes. Hence, we identify distinct configurations of value proposition characteristics that are successful in either changing the elements comprising the market system or inducing an overall system-level market change.

  • 5.
    Sklyar, Alexey
    Linköping University, Department of Management and Engineering, Industrial Economics. Linköping University, Faculty of Science & Engineering.
    The role of service ecosystems in servitization: A literature review2017Conference paper (Other academic)
  • 6.
    Sklyar, Alexey
    et al.
    Linköping University, Department of Management and Engineering, Industrial Economics. Linköping University, Faculty of Science & Engineering.
    Kowalkowski, Christian
    Linköping University, Department of Management and Engineering, Industrial Economics. Linköping University, Faculty of Science & Engineering.
    Sörhammar, David
    Tronvoll, Bård
    A network perspective on servitization2016Conference paper (Refereed)
    Abstract [en]

    The focus of this article is the network-level transition process that takes place when businesses and industries move towards an increased service provision. As previous studies have demonstrated, different network actors can play a key role in successful service transition, which is why a deeper understanding of servitization at the network level is required. The purpose of this paper is to synthesize and structure research in the intersection of servitization and business networks, and to create a research agenda and future directions for studies on the network nature of servitization. Based on the conducted literature review, we suggest that future research is needed in the following three areas: (1) actors and relations: (2) resources and capabilities: (3) development and business models. For each of these areas we created a number of takeaways signaling future avenues for the research field. Each takeaway is based on the carried out literature review and the challenges pinpointed in the analyzed articles. Relying on this understanding, we propose eight takeaways as a development of the research on network nature of servitization. The present paper contributes to research (1) by synthesizing the articles in the intersection of networks and servitization connected to the field of service research, (2) by categorizing and theorizing about common denominators within this new marketing research field, and (3) by proposing eight specific takeaways regarding what research is needed within network nature of servitization.

  • 7.
    Sklyar, Alexey
    et al.
    Linköping University, Department of Management and Engineering, Industrial Economics. Linköping University, Faculty of Science & Engineering.
    Kowalkowski, Christian
    Linköping University, Department of Management and Engineering, Industrial Economics. Linköping University, Faculty of Science & Engineering.
    Sörhammar, David
    Stockholm Business School, Stockholm University, Sweden.
    Tronvoll, Bård
    Inland Norway University of Applied Sciences, Norway; CTF – Service Research Center, Karlstad University, Sweden..
    Resource integration through digitalisation: a service ecosystem perspective2019In: Journal of Marketing Management, ISSN 0267-257X, E-ISSN 1472-1376Article in journal (Refereed)
    Abstract [en]

    As digitalisation increasingly encompasses entire service ecosystems, it modifies resource integration patterns that connect ecosystem actors through strong and weak ties. To clarify how technological development contributes to this change, and how resource integration transforms the service ecosystem, this qualitative case study explores the digitalisation strategy of a market-leading systems integrator in the maritime industry. Based on 40 depth interviews with managers, the findings show how technology increasingly serves as a key operant resource in the transformation of resource integration patterns. The study contributes to ecosystem dynamics research by identifying major differences between the pre-digitalised and digitalised states of a service ecosystem, and demonstrates the dual role of technology in both increasing pattern complexity and facilitating coordination of that complexity.

  • 8.
    Sklyar, Alexey
    et al.
    Linköping University, Department of Management and Engineering, Industrial Economics. Linköping University, Faculty of Science & Engineering.
    Kowalkowski, Christian
    Linköping University, Department of Management and Engineering, Industrial Economics. Linköping University, Faculty of Science & Engineering. Department of Marketing, CERS – Centre for Relationship Marketing and Service Management, Hanken School of Economics, Finland.
    Tronvoll, Bård
    nland Norway University of Applied Sciences, Norway; CTF – Service Research Center, Karlstad University, Sweden.
    Sörhammar, David
    Stockholm Business School, Stockholm University, Sweden.
    Organizing for digital servitization: A service ecosystem perspective2019In: Journal of Business Research, ISSN 0148-2963, E-ISSN 1873-7978, Vol. 104, p. 450-460Article in journal (Refereed)
    Abstract [en]

    Harnessing digital technology is of increasing concern as product firms organize for service-led growth. Adopting a service ecosystem perspective, we analyze interfirm and intrafirm change processes taking place as firms pursue digital servitization. The study draws on in-depth interviews with 44 managers involved in organizing activities in two multinational industry leaders. Our findings identify major differences between the two focal firms in terms of digital service-led growth and associated ecosystem-related activities. The study disentangles underlying processes of organizational change in the ecosystem and suggests that within-firm centralization and integration play a key role in the capacity to organize for digital servitization. For managers, the findings highlight the need to foster service-centricity in order to take full advantage of digitalization beyond purely technological benefits.

  • 9. Sörhammar, David
    et al.
    Kowalkowski, Christian
    Linköping University, Department of Management and Engineering, Industrial Economics. Linköping University, Faculty of Science & Engineering.
    Tronvoll, Bård
    Sklyar, Alexey
    Linköping University, Department of Management and Engineering, Industrial Economics. Linköping University, Faculty of Science & Engineering.
    A service ecosystem perspective on the digital service journey2017Conference paper (Refereed)
  • 10. Tronvoll, Bård
    et al.
    Kowalkowski, Christian
    Linköping University, Department of Management and Engineering, Industrial Economics. Linköping University, Faculty of Science & Engineering.
    Sklyar, Alexey
    Linköping University, Department of Management and Engineering, Industrial Economics. Linköping University, Faculty of Science & Engineering.
    Sörhammar, David
    Digital servitization among service ecosystem actors2019Conference paper (Refereed)
  • 11. Tóth, Zsófia
    et al.
    Kowalkowski, Christian
    Linköping University, Department of Management and Engineering, Industrial Economics. Linköping University, Faculty of Science & Engineering.
    Sklyar, Alexey
    Linköping University, Department of Management and Engineering, Industrial Economics. Linköping University, Faculty of Science & Engineering.
    Sörhammar, David
    Tronvoll, Bård
    Wirths, Oliver
    Digital Servitization through the lenses of Paradox Theory: Evidence from the Aerospace & Maritime Industries2019Conference paper (Refereed)
  • 12. Tóth, Zsófia
    et al.
    Kowalkowski, Christian
    Linköping University, Department of Management and Engineering, Industrial Economics. Linköping University, Faculty of Science & Engineering.
    Sörhammar, David
    Sklyar, Alexey
    Linköping University, Department of Management and Engineering, Industrial Economics. Linköping University, Faculty of Science & Engineering.
    Tronvoll, Bård
    Wirths, Oliver
    Digital servitization through the lenses of paradox theory – The evidence of tensions from the aerospace and maritime industries2019Conference paper (Refereed)
1 - 12 of 12
CiteExportLink to result list
Permanent link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • oxford
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf