Unmyelinated low-threshold mechanoreceptors (C-tactile, CT) in the human skin are important for signaling information about hedonic aspects of touch. We have previously reported that CT-targeted brush stroking by means of a robot reduces experimental mechanical pain. To improve the ecological validity of the stimulation, we developed standardized human-human touch gestures for signaling attention and calming. The attention gesture is characterized by tapping of the skin and is perceived as neither pleasant nor unpleasant, i.e., neutral. The calming gesture is characterized by slow stroking of the skin and is perceived as moderately to very pleasant. Furthermore, the attention (tapping) gesture is ineffective, whereas the calming (stroking) gesture is effective in activating CT-afferents. We conducted an fMRI study (n = 32) and capitalized on the previous development of touch gestures. We also developed an MR compatible stimulator for high-precision mechanical pain stimulation of the thenar region of the hand. Skin-to-skin touching (stroking or tapping) was applied and was followed by low and high pain. When the stroking gesture preceded pain, the pain was rated as less intense. When the tapping gesture preceded the pain, the pain was rated as more intense. Individual pain perception related to insula activation, but the activation was not higher for stroking than for tapping in any brain area during the stimulation period. However, during the evaluation period, stronger activation in the periaqueductal gray matter was observed after calming touch compared to after tapping touch. This finding invites speculation that human-human gentle skin stroking, effective in activating CT-afferents, reduced pain through neural processes involving CT-afferents and the descending pain pathway.

Neural mechanisms of touch are typically studied in laboratory settings using robotic or other types of well-controlled devices. Such stimuli are very different from highly complex naturalistic human-to-human touch interactions. The lack of scientifically useful naturalistic stimuli hampers progress, particularly in social touch research. Vision science, on the other hand, has benefitted from inventions such as virtual reality systems that have provided researchers with precision control of naturalistic stimuli. In the field of touch research, producing and manipulating stimuli is particularly challenging due to the complexity of skin mechanics. Here, we review the history of touch neuroscience focusing on the contrast between strictly controlled and naturalistic stimuli, and compare the field to vision science. We discuss new methods that may overcome obstacles with precision-controlled tactile stimuli, and recent successes in naturalistic texture production. In social touch research, precise tracking and measurement of naturalistic human-to-human touch interactions offer exciting new possibilities.