liu.seSök publikationer i DiVA
Ändra sökning
Avgränsa sökresultatet
1 - 5 av 5
RefereraExporteraLänk till träfflistan
Permanent länk
Referera
Referensformat
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • oxford
  • Annat format
Fler format
Språk
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Annat språk
Fler språk
Utmatningsformat
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Träffar per sida
  • 5
  • 10
  • 20
  • 50
  • 100
  • 250
Sortering
  • Standard (Relevans)
  • Författare A-Ö
  • Författare Ö-A
  • Titel A-Ö
  • Titel Ö-A
  • Publikationstyp A-Ö
  • Publikationstyp Ö-A
  • Äldst först
  • Nyast först
  • Skapad (Äldst först)
  • Skapad (Nyast först)
  • Senast uppdaterad (Äldst först)
  • Senast uppdaterad (Nyast först)
  • Disputationsdatum (tidigaste först)
  • Disputationsdatum (senaste först)
  • Standard (Relevans)
  • Författare A-Ö
  • Författare Ö-A
  • Titel A-Ö
  • Titel Ö-A
  • Publikationstyp A-Ö
  • Publikationstyp Ö-A
  • Äldst först
  • Nyast först
  • Skapad (Äldst först)
  • Skapad (Nyast först)
  • Senast uppdaterad (Äldst först)
  • Senast uppdaterad (Nyast först)
  • Disputationsdatum (tidigaste först)
  • Disputationsdatum (senaste först)
Markera
Maxantalet träffar du kan exportera från sökgränssnittet är 250. Vid större uttag använd dig av utsökningar.
  • 1.
    Olausson, Albin
    et al.
    Linköpings universitet, Institutionen för ekonomisk och industriell utveckling, Statsvetenskap. Linköpings universitet, Filosofiska fakulteten.
    Svensson, Petra
    Linköpings universitet, Institutionen för studier av samhällsutveckling och kultur, Centrum för kommunstrategiska studier – CKS. Linköpings universitet, Filosofiska fakulteten.
    Understanding Political Entrepreneurship in Local Government Administration: a Contextual Framework2019Ingår i: Lex Localis, ISSN 1581-5374, E-ISSN 1855-363X, Vol. 17, nr 3, s. 643-658Artikel i tidskrift (Refereegranskat)
    Abstract [en]

    It has been argued that political entrepreneurship is playing an increased role for public organizations and play a vital role in local government organizations. Political entrepreneurship has previously been studied from the motivations and actions of the individual entrepreneur. We argue that in order to understand why political entrepreneurship occurs in local public administration, these aspects are not enough. Instead, we need to consider entrepreneurship as situated, and analyse contextual conditions which form institutional demands for political entrepreneurship. A tentative framework is presented, which distinguish conditions coming from reformed organizational setting and conditions coming from new policy challenges. Finally, we conclude that the character of the conditions and thus the institutional demands directs political entrepreneurship towards either value-generative or collaborative entrepreneurship.

  • 2.
    Svensson, Petra
    Göteborgs universitet, Samhällsvetenskapliga fakulteten, University of Gothenburg, Faculty of Social Sciences.
    Cross-Sector Strategists. Dedicated Bureaucrats in Local Government Administration2018Doktorsavhandling, monografi (Övrigt vetenskapligt)
    Abstract [en]

    It is argued that political-administrative organizations are becoming increasingly complex with more horizontal governance required. In Swedish municipal administration, there is a group of administrators assigned the task of monitoring and promoting strategic topics that should be integrated horizontally within the organization. Examples of strategic topics are sustainability, safety/security, diversity, children/youth, public health, human rights, and gender equality. In the thesis, these administrators are called cross-sector strategists. The purpose of this dissertation is to explore how cross-sector strategists become a part of the political-administrative organization when representing, enacting, and reflecting on values in the undertaking of their formal posts. They are situated between the tradition of vertical governance, with formal procedures and hierarchy as its foundation, and the tradition of horizontal governance, with informal networks and deliberation as its foundation. Previous research has shown that this is likely to give rise to value conflicts, and the question is if cross-sector strategists experience value conflicts, and if so, how they cope with them. The cross-sector strategists are studied in this thesis from the perspective of situated agency – focusing on both the contextual expectations of the cross-sector strategists and on their internal reflections to solve value conflicts – in order to explore their process of becoming a part of the local government administration. A mixed-methods design is applied, containing analysis of job advertisements for cross-sector strategists, public managers, and social workers; in-depth interviews with cross-sector strategists; and a survey of professional networks for cross-sector strategists. The results show that cross-sector strategists are subjects to ambivalent and often-contradictory contextual expectations. Cross-sector strategists use the ambivalence of their work for their strategic purposes, and such ambivalence allows them to reframe their topics, their methods, their arguments, and their identity according to current situation in order to increase the impact of their assigned topics and diminish the inner conflict of wanting to be both a responsive bureaucrat and an active lobbyist. Combining these two dedications requires them to be highly reflexive and flexible actors. The outcome of cross-sector strategists’ coping with value conflicts can be interpreted in two ways: 1) as if the cross-sector strategists are a formal tool to safeguard crucial democratic and ethical values due to the cross-sector strategists’ method of sneaking the strategic policy areas into the organization. Or 2) as a to democracy risky administrative behavior in the long-term due to the disguising of value conflicts and diminished possibilities to process these value conflicts.

  • 3.
    Svensson, Petra
    et al.
    Linköpings universitet, Institutionen för studier av samhällsutveckling och kultur, Centrum för kommunstrategiska studier – CKS. Linköpings universitet, Filosofiska fakulteten.
    Larsson, Sebastian
    Linköpings universitet, Institutionen för studier av samhällsutveckling och kultur, Centrum för kommunstrategiska studier – CKS. Linköpings universitet, Filosofiska fakulteten.
    Kunskapsstyrning i besöksnäringen: Regionala samordnares perspektiv på kunskap i destinationsutveckling2018Rapport (Övrigt vetenskapligt)
    Abstract [sv]

    Denna studie syftar till att klargöra vilka kunskapsaktörer som uppfattas som viktiga för den svenska besöksnäringen, hur kunskapsperspektiv samordnas, vilka kunskapsnätverk som finns i regionerna och hur man i dessa arbetar med kunskapsstyrning. Genom att studera detta får vi en grund för att dra slutsatser kring olika former av kunskapsstyrning inom besöksnäringen.

    Rapporten är skriven inom forskningsprojektet ”Kunskapsstyrning i besöksnäringen”. Projektet finansieras av Tillväxtverket, och syftar till att undersöka hur kommuner och regioner kan stödja, påverka och främja kunskapsutveckling inom besöksnäringen. Projektet grundar sig i Tillväxtverkets insatser under perioden 2016-2019, Hållbar produktutveckling (HPU), som syftar till att skapa det som man kallar fler ”exportmogna” turistdestinationer. I denna insats ingår sju regionala aktörer: Region Blekinge, Region Dalarna, Regionförbundet Uppsala län, Region Östergötland, Smålands Turism AB, Tourism in Skåne AB och Västarvet. Rapportens huvudsakliga empiriska material är intervjuer med de regionala projektledarna, som kompletterats med intervjuer med besöksnäringsföretagare.

    Studien utgår från litteratur om kunskapsstyrning och kunskapsutveckling kombinerat med litteratur om samverkan, tvärsektoriell styrning och nätverk.

    Vi analyserar intervjumaterialet utifrån tre frågor:

    1. Vilken form av kunskap står i fokus?
    2. Vilka aktörer blir föremål för kunskapsstyrning och hur interagerar dessa aktörers kunskap?
    3. Vilka nätverksformer för kunskapsflöden kan urskiljas?

    Tre primära former av organisering för kunskapsstyrning kan skönjas i analysen. Den första kännetecknas av organiskt och ganska informellt utbyte av kunskaper mellan aktörer, utan specifikt angiven riktning på kunskapsstyrningen. Den andra kännetecknas av strategiskt arbete med inriktning mot att få olika aktörer att ta sig an destinationsperspektivet. Detta innebär en mer formellt angiven riktning på kunskapsstyrningen. Den tredje kännetecknas av en uppdelning av olika slags perspektiv och kunskaper mellan aktörer, där de regionala aktörerna intar ett destinationsperspektiv och strategiskt stöttar besöksnäringsföretag i sin utveckling utifrån detta perspektiv, samtidigt som dessa fokuserar på sina specifika kunskapsområden. Samtliga former för kunskapsstyrning har potentiella för- och nackdelar för kunskapsutvecklingen inom besöksnäringen.

  • 4.
    Svensson, Petra
    School of Public Administration, University of Gothenburg, Sweden.
    Strategists in the intersection of logics: A study of job advertisements in the Swedish municipal administration2015Rapport (Övrigt vetenskapligt)
    Abstract [en]

    This report is a study of how public administrators responsible for horizontal perspectives in Swedish local government are handling their role as bureaucrats and political promoters. Gender equality, public health, human rights, rights of children, and environmental protection are examples of perspectives which local authorities are obliged to take into consideration when making political decisions. In order to ensure this, certain strategists are appointed who are supposed to work across all sectors promoting the values and goals of their specific perspective. The role of these strategists contains several paradoxes and complexities.

  • 5.
    Svensson, Petra
    Göteborgs universitet, Samhällsvetenskapliga fakulteten, University of Gothenburg, Faculty of Social Sciences.
    ”Den nya svenskinspirerade föräldrapenningen har haft avsedd verkan”: En studie av den tyska föräldraförsäkringens förändring ur ett jämställdhetsperspektiv2010Rapport (Övrigt vetenskapligt)
    Abstract [en]

    It is argued that political-administrative organizations are becoming increasingly complex with more horizontal governance required. In Swedish municipal administration, there is a group of administrators assigned the task of monitoring and promoting strategic topics that should be integrated horizontally within the organization. Examples of strategic topics are sustainability, safety/security, diversity, children/youth, public health, human rights, and gender equality. In the thesis, these administrators are called cross-sector strategists. The purpose of this dissertation is to explore how cross-sector strategists become a part of the political-administrative organization when representing, enacting, and reflecting on values in the undertaking of their formal posts. They are situated between the tradition of vertical governance, with formal procedures and hierarchy as its foundation, and the tradition of horizontal governance, with informal networks and deliberation as its foundation. Previous research has shown that this is likely to give rise to value conflicts, and the question is if cross-sector strategists experience value conflicts, and if so, how they cope with them. The cross-sector strategists are studied in this thesis from the perspective of situated agency – focusing on both the contextual expectations of the cross-sector strategists and on their internal reflections to solve value conflicts – in order to explore their process of becoming a part of the local government administration. A mixed-methods design is applied, containing analysis of job advertisements for cross-sector strategists, public managers, and social workers; in-depth interviews with cross-sector strategists; and a survey of professional networks for cross-sector strategists. The results show that cross-sector strategists are subjects to ambivalent and often-contradictory contextual expectations. Cross-sector strategists use the ambivalence of their work for their strategic purposes, and such ambivalence allows them to reframe their topics, their methods, their arguments, and their identity according to current situation in order to increase the impact of their assigned topics and diminish the inner conflict of wanting to be both a responsive bureaucrat and an active lobbyist. Combining these two dedications requires them to be highly reflexive and flexible actors. The outcome of cross-sector strategists’ coping with value conflicts can be interpreted in two ways: 1) as if the cross-sector strategists are a formal tool to safeguard crucial democratic and ethical values due to the cross-sector strategists’ method of sneaking the strategic policy areas into the organization. Or 2) as a to democracy risky administrative behavior in the long-term due to the disguising of value conflicts and diminished possibilities to process these value conflicts

1 - 5 av 5
RefereraExporteraLänk till träfflistan
Permanent länk
Referera
Referensformat
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • oxford
  • Annat format
Fler format
Språk
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Annat språk
Fler språk
Utmatningsformat
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf