Automated problem reformulation is a common technique in classical planning to identify and exploit problem structures. Decoupled search is an approach that automatically decomposes planning tasks based on their causal structure, often significantly reducing the search effort. However, its broad applicability is limited by the need for specialized algorithms. In this paper, we present an approach that embodies decoupled search for non-optimal planning through a novel task transformation. Specifically, given a task and a decomposition, we create a transformed task such that the state space of the transformed task is isomorphic to that of decoupled search on the original task. This eliminates the need for specialized algorithms and allows the use of various planning technology in the decoupled-search framework. Empirical evaluation shows that our method is empirically competitive with specialized decoupled algorithms and favorable to other related problem reformulation techniques. 

Matrix multiplication is a fundamental operation of linear algebra, with applications ranging from quantum physics to artificial intelligence. Given its importance, enormous resources have been invested in the search for faster matrix multiplication algorithms. Recently, this search has been cast as a single-player game. By learning how to play this game efficiently, the newly-introduced AlphaTensor reinforcement learning agent is able to discover many new faster algorithms. In this paper, we show that finding matrix multiplication algorithms can also be cast as a classical planning problem. Based on this observation, we introduce a challenging benchmark suite for classical planning and evaluate state-of-the-art planning techniques on it. We analyze the strengths and limitations of different planning approaches in this domain and show that we can use classical planning to find lower bounds and concrete algorithms for matrix multiplication.

Since its introduction, partial satisfaction planning (PSP), including both oversubscription (OSP) and net-benefit, has received significant attention in the classical planning community. However, hierarchical aspects have been mostly ignored in this context, although several problem domains that form the main motivation for PSP, such as the rover domain, have an inherent hierarchical structure. In this paper, we are taking the necessary steps for facilitating this research direction. First, we formally define hierarchical partial satisfaction planning problems and discuss the usefulness and necessity of this formalism. Second, we present a carefully structured set of benchmarks consisting of OSP and net-benefit problems with hierarchical structure. We describe and analyze the different domains of the benchmark set and the desiderata that are met to provide an interesting and challenging starting point for upcoming research. Third, we introduce various planning techniques that can solve hierarchical OSP problems and investigate their empirical behaviour on our proposed benchmark.

Combinatorial reconfiguration is the problem of transforming one solution of a combinatorial problem into another, where each transformation may only apply small changes to a solution and may not leave the solution space. An important example is the independent set reconfiguration (ISR) problem, where an independent set of a graph (a subset of its vertices without edges between them) has to be transformed into another by a sequence of transformations that can replace a vertex in the current subset such that the new subset is still an independent set. The 1st Combinatorial Reconfiguration Challenge (CoRe Challenge 2022) was a competition focused on the ISR problem. The PARIS team successfully participated with two solvers that model the ISR problem as a planning task and employ different planning techniques for solving it. In this work, we describe these models and solvers. For a fair comparison to competing ISR approaches, we re-run the entire competition under equal computational conditions. Besides showcasing the success of planning technology, we hope that this work will create a cross-fertilization of the two research fields.

Cost partitioning is the foundation of today’s strongest heuristics for optimal classical planning. However, computing a cost partitioning for each evaluated state is prohibitively expensive in practice. Thus, existing approaches make an approximation and compute a cost partitioning only for a set of sampled states, and then reuse the resulting heuristics for all other states evaluated during the search. In this paper, we present exact methods for cost partitioning heuristics based on linear programming that fully preserve heuristic accuracy while minimizing computational cost. Specifically, we focus on saturated post-hoc optimization and establish several sufficient conditions for when reusing a cost partitioning computed for one state preserves the estimates for other states, mainly based on a sensitivity analysis of the underlying linear program. Our experiments demonstrate that our theoretical results transfer into practice, and that our exact cost partitioning algorithms are competitive with the strongest approximations currently available, while usually requiring fewer linear program evaluations.

In top-k planning, the objective is to determine a set of k cheapest plans that provide several good alternatives to choose from. Such a solution set often contains plans that visit at least one state more than once. Depending on the application, plans with such loops are of little importance because they are dominated by a loopless representative and can prevent more meaningful plans from being found.

In this paper, we motivate and introduce loopless top-k planning. We show how to enhance the state-of-the-art symbolic top-k planner, symK, to obtain an efficient, sound and complete algorithm for loopless top-k planning. An empirical evaluation shows that our proposed approach has a higher k-coverage than a generate-and-test approach that uses an ordinary top-k planner, which we show to be incomplete in the presence of zero-cost loops.

Cartesian counterexample-guided abstraction refinement (CEGAR) yields strong heuristics for optimal classical planning. CEGAR repeatedly finds counterexamples, i.e., abstract plans that fail for the concrete task. Although there are usually many such abstract plans to choose from, the refinement strategy from previous work is to choose an arbitrary optimal one. In this work, we show that an informed refinement strategy is critical in theory and practice. We demonstrate that it is possible to execute all optimal abstract plans in the concrete task simultaneously, and present methods to minimize the time and number of refinement steps until we find a concrete solution. The resulting algorithm solves more tasks than the previous state of the art for Cartesian CEGAR, both during refinement and when used as a heuristic in an A* search.

Heuristic search is a successful approach to cost-optimal planning. Bidirectional heuristic search algorithms have been around for a long time, but only recent advances have led to algorithms like BAE* that have the potential to outperform unidirectional heuristic search algorithms like A* in practice. In this work, we analyze BAE* for classical planning and the challenges associated with the underlying assumption of an explicit state representation. We show that it is crucial to use mutexes and reachability analysis to reduce the potentially exponential number of goal states, which makes it possible to create an explicit representation of a reversed planning task that can be used for the backward search of BAE*. Our empirical evaluation shows that BAE* solves more instances than A* in multiple domains with significantly fewer node expansions, demonstrating the usefulness of BAE* in planning.

Cost partitioning admissibly combines the information from multiple heuristics for optimal state-space search. One of the strongest cost partitioning algorithms is saturated cost partitioning. It considers the heuristics in sequence and assigns to each heuristic the minimal fraction of the remaining costs that are needed for preserving all heuristic estimates. Saturated cost partitioning has recently been generalized in two directions: first, by allowing to use different costs for the transitions induced by the same operator, and second, by preserving the heuristic estimates for only a subset of states. In this work, we unify these two generalizations and show that the resulting subset-saturated transition cost partitioning algorithm usually yields stronger heuristics than the two generalizations by themselves.