Open this publication in new window or tab >>Show others...
2023 (English)Conference paper, Oral presentation with published abstract (Other academic)
Abstract [en]
Climate change is a critical challenge facing society, and understanding earth systems, like the carbon cycle, has become an essential component of educational curricula around the world. The Swedish compulsory school curriculum emphasises learning about the carbon cycle and its connection with various biological and environmental issues. Understanding the carbon cycle is complex and requires recognising the carbon reservoirs, how carbon atoms circulate between reservoirs, and various dynamic relationships that exist within the system. These characteristics align with systems thinking skills, a crucial aspect of learning and teaching science. Assaraf and Orion (2005) have summarised eight hierarchical characteristics of systems thinking in the context of earth systems and have proposed the Systems Thinking Hierarchical (STH) model to describe how students learn about complex earth systems. The hierarchical levels of this framework include system thinking abilities that comprise analysis (e.g. identifying components), synthesis (e.g. relating components), and implementation (e.g. understanding hidden dimensions).
The carbon cycle is often taught through simplified and static diagrams in school textbooks, which can make learning about this abstract cycle and its interrelating components very challenging for high school students in grades 7-9 (e.g. Düsing, Asshoff, & Hammann, 2019). An example of a common difficulty in this context is to understand how carbon atoms move between various organisational levels. To address such challenges, carefully developed interactive visualizations that guide pupils through the components of the carbon cycle can help scaffold their systems thinking skills. Contemporary research in this area includes work on interactive learning environments in STEM contexts and adaptive feedback for supporting the learning of complex natural systems (Linn et al., 2014; Vitale, McBride, & Linn, 2016). Although these environments have proved promising, there remains a need to explicitly involve teachers in the design process, as well as connect established theoretical frameworks to learning goals of school science curricula. In this regard, not much effort has been directed to pedagogically-informed design and implementation of adaptive interactive learning environments for developing learners’ systems thinking. In fact, very little work has reported systematic design processes as an empirical contribution in the development of science education interventions (e.g. see Bopardikar, Bernstein, & McKenney, 2021).
In response, as part of a larger research program, the purpose of this work is to provide a theoretically and teacher-informed design process of an adaptive interactive visual learning environment that supports the development of grade 7-9 learners’ systems thinking skills in the context of the carbon cycle.
To respond to this aim we describe our iterative and theory-based design process by highlighting the main design activities and the rationale behind them, including: 1) content conceptualisation, 2) pedagogical (teacher) input, and 3) adaptive characteristics. The outcome of this process has resulted in an adaptive interactive visual learning environment with multiple learning tasks and quizzes organised in three modules. Each module is designed with coherent learning objectives aligned with a hierarchy of systems thinking skills and the Swedish school curriculum. Pupils interact with the learning tasks through three core mechanics including: A) dragging and dropping cards to complete a diagram, B) drawing arrows to complete the partial and global cycles, and C) clicking on the icons to reveal more information. Pupils’ interaction with this learning environment is supported through various forms of immediate (e.g. automatically correcting a misdrawn arrow) and delayed feedback (e.g. visual and textual verification of a correct response following a task response). Focusing on the carbon cycle, our work aims to provide a personalised learning experience for learners in grade 7-9 in scaffolding different levels of systems thinking.
National Category
Educational Sciences
Identifiers
urn:nbn:se:liu:diva-222133 (URN)
Conference
The European Conference on Educational Research (ECER)
Note
References:
Assaraf, O. B.-Z., & Orion, N. (2005). Development of system thinking skills in the context of earth system education. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 42(5), 518–560.
Bopardikar, A., Bernstein, D., & McKenney, S. (2021). Designer considerations and processes in developing school-based citizen-science curricula for environmental education. Journal of Biological Education, 1–26.
Düsing, K., Asshoff, R., & Hammann, M. (2019). Students’ conceptions of the carbon cycle: Identifying and interrelating components of the carbon cycle and tracing carbon atoms across the levels of biological organisation. Journal of Biological Education, 53(1), 110–125.
Floyd, C. (1984). A Systematic Look at Prototyping. In R. Budde, K. Kuhlenkamp, L. Mathiassen, & H. Züllighoven (Eds.), Approaches to Prototyping (pp. 1–18). Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer.
Linn, M. C., Gerard, L., Ryoo, K., McElhaney, K., Liu, O. L., & Rafferty, A. N. (2014). Computer-Guided Inquiry to Improve Science Learning. Science, 344(6180), 155–156.
Vitale, J. M., McBride, E., & Linn, M. C. (2016). Distinguishing complex ideas about climate change: knowledge integration vs. Specific guidance. International Journal of Science Education, 38(9), 1548–1569.
2026-03-232026-03-232026-03-27