Open this publication in new window or tab >>Show others...
2026 (English)In: Journal of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography, ISSN 1934-5925Article in journal (Refereed) Epub ahead of print
Abstract [en]
Background: Coronary CT angiography (CCTA) is a key non-invasive tool for evaluating coronary artery disease (CAD). While energy-integrating detector CT (EID-CT) offers high negative predictive value (NPV), its positive predictive value (PPV) is limited in heavily calcified vessels. Photon-counting detector CT (PCD-CT), with higher spatial resolution and reduced blooming, may enhance diagnostic performance. Current PCD-CT systems provide both standard-resolution (SR) and ultra-high-resolution (UHR) modes, but the clinical impact of these modes remains under investigation.
Objectives: To compare the diagnostic accuracy and image quality of SR-PCD-CT versus EID-CT in quantifying coronary stenosis, using quantitative coronary angiography (QCA) as reference. Materials and methods: In this prospective, single-centre study, 21 patients (5 women, mean age 71.5 years) with suspected CAD underwent CCTA with both EID-CT and SR-PCD-CT prior to QCA. A total of 301 coronary segments were assessed for stenosis severity, with ≥50 % stenosis deemed significant. Image quality was graded using a 5-point scale.
Results: No significant differences in percentage diameter stenosis (%DS) were found between imaging techniques (p = 0.20). Both EID-CT and SR-PCD-CT showed good agreement with QCA (AUC: PCD-CT 0.89, EID-CT 0.86). Specificity and NPV were high for both; sensitivity and PPV were moderate. SR-PCD-CT yielded higher image quality compared to EID-CT (p < 0.001).
Conclusions: In standard resolution mode, PCD-CT offers excellent image quality for quantifying coronary stenosis at comparable diagnostic accuracy compared to EID-CT
Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Elsevier, 2026
Keywords
PCD-CT, CCTA, CAD, Stenosis assessment, Image quality
National Category
Medical Imaging
Identifiers
urn:nbn:se:liu:diva-221516 (URN)10.1016/j.jcct.2026.01.003 (DOI)
2026-02-252026-02-252026-02-25Bibliographically approved