Engineering design projects can enhance authenticity, increase relevance, and integrateSTEM subjects without compromising their individual integrity. Nevertheless, the literature also warns that few STEM subject integration projects acknowledge students’ contexts and everyday problems. This study explores how teachers prepare for STEM subject integration in an engineering design project in a Swedish upper secondary school Technology programme and examines the process and outcomes of project implementation from both teachers’ and students’ viewpoints. The design project induces students’ solutions for bettering their everyday physical school context regarding well-being, feasibility, and sustainability. Collection of data employed participatory observations, and interviews with teachers and students. Results are presented as four themes: (1) integration and collaboration can be encouraged through project organization; (2) the engineering design process is the centrepiece of the integrated project; (3) models and modelling are primarily used for communication of design ideas; and (4) integration of STEM content and methods seldomly draws on more than two disciplines. Findings show that utilizing the school’s technology profle provides an accessible pathway to promote integrated STEM. However, although several teachers demonstrate enthusiasm for the real-world relevance of design projects, integration remains challenging. Since the project was mostly viewed as being technology and engineering-based, science and mathematics were present to a lesser degree, which made integration of all STEM subjects demanding. Nevertheless, the project could be seen as responding to an “extended STEM problem” in that components from health sciences were also incorporated.

Les projets de conception technique peuvent renforcer l’authenticité, accroître la pertinence et intégrer les matières STIM sans compromettre leur intégrité individuelle. Néanmoins, la documentation existante met également en garde contre le fait que peu de projets d’intégration des matières STIM tiennent compte des contextes et des problèmes quotidiens des élèves. Cette étude s’intéresse à la manière dont les enseignants se préparent à l’intégration des matières STIM dans un projet de conception technique d’un programme de technologie applicable à la deuxième partie du secondaire dans une école suédoise et examine le processus et les résultats de la mise en œuvre du projet, du point de vue des enseignants et des élèves. Le projet de conception incite les élèves à trouver des solutions pour améliorer au quotidien le contexte physique de l’école en ce qui a trait aux enjeux de bien-être, de faisabilité et de durabilité. La collecte des données a fait appel à des observations participatives et à des entrevues avec des enseignants et des étudiants. On présente les résultats sous la forme de quatre thèmes: (1) on peut encourager l’intégration et la collaboration par l’aspect de l’organisation du projet; (2) le processus de conception technique est la pièce maîtresse du projet intégré; (3) les modèles et la modélisation sont principalement utilisés pour communiquer les idées de conception; et (4) l’intégration du contenu et des méthodes des STIM fait rarement appel à plus de deux matières. Les résultats indiquent que l’utilisation du profl technologique de l’école constitue une voie accessible pour promouvoir l’intégration des STIM. Cependant, bien que plusieurs enseignants fassent preuve d’enthousiasme en ce qui concerne la pertinence dans le monde réel des projets de conception, l’intégration reste difcile. Étant donné que le projet était principalement perçu comme fondé sur la technologie et l’ingénierie, les sciences et les mathématiques étaient moins présentes, ce qui a rendu l’intégration de toutes les matières STIM laborieuse. Néanmoins, le projet peut être vu comme une réponse à un « problème STIM étendu» dans la mesure où on a également incorporé des éléments des sciences de la santé.

National and international policy documents emphasize the need for AI-related competencies “for all”, but there is little clarity on what these competencies should include, and determining what non-experts need to know remains a challenge. AI literacy has become a widely discussed topic in this context, often referring to a set of skills that empower individuals to critically evaluate AI, communicate and collaborate effectively with AI systems, and utilize AI as a tool across diverse contexts, including online environments, homes, schools, and workplaces. However, what AI literacy looks like in practice depends on factors such as age, level of education, and individual background. In this article, we frame AI literacy based on a qualitative analysis of the views of 33 international experts from various disciplines on what AI literacy in K-12 education should encompass. This analysis builds on existing AI literacy frameworks, with a focus on understanding and critically evaluating AI’s role in daily life, recognizing and using AI, and designing AI solutions for everyday problems. The findings show that experts emphasize a wide range of knowledge, skills, and attitudes, highlighting the importance of multiple perspectives when exploring this emerging field.

AI literacy in school education is booming within the scientific discourse of AI in education. How AI literacy is currently being framed serves diverse educational, political, and commercial purposes influencing how we imagine postdigital classrooms today and in the future. More importantly, how AI literacy emerges in primary education notably impacts how children understand AI and their own agency in a society where AI is ubiquitous. This study reviews how scientific literature conceptualises AI literacy, focusing on middle school students. An AI-adapted literacy framework (GeST) is used in the analysis to distinguish three perspectives of AI literacy (Generic, Situated, and Transformative). Forty-four papers from 2016–2024 were included in the final descriptive and qualitative analysis, showing an exponential growth in scientific papers. While still vaguely defined and poorly theorised, AI literacy materialises into different AI curricula and technology-supported teaching activities. The GeST analysis indicates that AI literacy is primarily viewed as a set of measurable skills related to generalisable theoretical knowledge that is expected to make children more competitive in a globalised and technologised world. Although some papers consider empowering students with specific competencies to challenge the AI development, critical considerations of AI in education is less visible. The paper highlights the necessity to steer the conceptualisation of AI literacy to put a stronger emphasis on critical orientations that enable students as well as teachers to examine claims about AI, and pose ethical questions to its adoption and use in classrooms and beyond.

The interest in artificial intelligence (AI) in education has erupted during the last few years, primarily due to technological advances in AI. It is therefore argued that students should learn about AI, although it is debated exactly how it should be applied in education. AI literacy has been suggested as a way of defining competencies for students to acquire to meet a future everyday- and working life with AI. This study argues that researchers and educators need a framework for integrating AI literacy into technological literacy, where the latter is viewed as a multiliteracy. This study thus aims to critically analyse and discuss different components of AI literacy found in the literature in relation to technological literacy. The data consists of five AI literacy frameworks related to three traditions of technological knowledge: technical skills, technological scientific knowledge, and socio-ethical technical understanding. The results show that AI literacy for technology education emphasises technological scientific knowledge (e.g., knowledge about what AI is, how to recognise AI, and systems thinking) and socio-ethical technical understanding (e.g., AI ethics and the role of humans in AI). Technical skills such as programming competencies also appear but are less emphasised. Implications for technology education are also discussed, and a framework for AI literacy for technology education is suggested.

Bringing more girls and women into science, technology, engineering and mathematics, STEM, is often highlighted as an aim in education and industry. A constantly growing body of research on engagement is driven by equity concerns caused by the unbalanced gender distribution in STEM. In this study, Swedish teenage girls on a three-day technol- ogy camp are in focus. The camp was an initiative with three goals: “Get girls interested, keep girls interested and provide knowledge about futures within technology professions”. We explored the participating girls’ technological activities and conceptions of technology at the camp. Data collection was conducted through participant observations and a focus group interview. Data were analysed using thematic analysis and a gender theoretical framework. Results show the camp presented uncertain notions of what technology can be, and traditionally male-oriented domains were “girlified”. However, girlified activities might not have been constructive in this context since the girls expressed interest in technology before the camp and showed few signs of gendering technology – they liked all kinds of technology. Girlified technology can, at its worst, give a false image of the future industrial work life that the camp organiser aimed to inspire. Despite this, the camp activities were still meaningful and relevant to the girls. The camp created opportunities for the girls to develop their sense of being technical and a feeling of belonging. Implications for technology classroom settings and future camps are to value practical work and improvisational design without leaving the teaching unreflected. This could be a way of engaging and familiarising girls with the multifaceted world of technology without girlifying it. In addition, a broad conception of technology could make gender codes less relevant and open new opportunities. 

The objective of problem solving in technology and engineering is to change the material world for the benefit of society, through processes of design. Design thinking – or design-based thinking – is thus a unique and crucial component of problem solving in technology and engineering. It also has connections to arts and design studies in which creativity and innovative thinking are central. In addition, design-based thinking has been applied in many other areas, disciplines, and educational initiatives such as designs for learning and design-based pedagogy. In this chapter, we shall expound on the notion of design-based thinking, in relation to problem solving in technology and engineering and more broadly across the STEM disciplines. We argue that the three components authentic thinking, visual thinking, and entrepreneurial thinking constitute essential conceptual elements of design-based thinking. We relate this conception of design-based thinking to problem solving, teaching interventions, and curriculum design in 21st-century STEM education.

The STEM acronym permeates educational research and practice. While the potential pedagogical merits of STEM as an opportunity to integrate knowledge from the contributing disciplines and achieve a holistic understanding are well-documented, little is known about how out-of-field teachers contend with contributing to such a vision in practice. With an intended audience of STEM teacher practitioners in mind, this chapter focuses on international expert views of technology (T) and engineering (E) in out-of-field teaching of integrated STEM. The presented views were solicited from experienced international researchers, education practitioners, and professionals in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics. Experts’ views emerged as five overarching themes that primarily identified: the importance of maintaining subject integrity, the implicit nature of technology and engineering in teaching activities, the centrality of engineering design processes, the necessity of collaboration and cooperation, and the need for specialised teacher competence. The emergent views have practical implications regarding engineering design and design-based teaching for informing curriculum design, teacher education programmes, as well as STEM textbooks and resource composition. The chapter closes by illuminating the question as to whether integrated STEM remains a sought epistemological position or only a method to teach STEM subjects, a dilemma whereupon our future work with STEM experts shall continue to explore.