INTRODUCTION:

Arterial thrombi contain more platelets than venous thrombi and are more resistant to fibrinolysis. This resistance could partly be due to plasminogen activator inhibitor 1 (PAI-1) secreted by platelets. The aim of this study was to elucidate differences between thrombin receptors protease-activated receptor (PAR) 1 and 4 and platelet storage, secretion and synthesis of platelet PAI-1, as compared to other platelet α-granule proteins such as VEGF and endostatin.

MATERIALS AND METHODS:

Human isolated platelets were incubated with thrombin (0.5U/ml), PAR1-activating peptide (AP) (0.4-30μM) or PAR4-AP (1.5-300μM) for up to 24hours. ELISA, western blot and fluorescence microscopy were used to measure secretion, contents and localization of PAI-1, VEGF and endostatin.

RESULTS:

Our results show that PAI-1 and VEGF might be co-localized and that endostatin does not co-localize with either PAI-1 or VEGF. PAI-1 and VEGF show a similar secretion pattern, being more sensitive to low grade PAR1 activation, but secretion was also observed with higher concentrations of PAR4-APs. PAI-1 is secreted in an active form. PAI-1 mRNA was found in platelets, and elevated levels of PAI-1 were detected after 24hours incubation of platelets.

CONCLUSIONS:

PAI-1 and VEGF, but not endostatin, might be stored in the same α-granule in human platelets. PAI-1 and VEGF also show a similar secretion pattern, being more sensitive to PAR1 than to PAR4 activation, but the secretion is not exclusively selective. Our results also show that platelet PAI-1 is increased if incubated for 24hours, both with addition of PAR1-activating peptide and without activation, which could indicate de novo synthesis.

n/a

FARs (protease-activated receptors) 1 and 4 belong to the family of G-protein-coupled receptors which induce both G(alpha 12/13) and G(alpha q) signalling. By applying the specific PAR1- and PAR4-activating hexapeptides, SFLLRN and AYPGKF respectively, we found that aggregation of isolated human platelets mediated via PAR1, but not via PAR4, is abolished upon homologous receptor activation in a concentration- and time-dependent fashion. This effect was not due to receptor internalization, but to a decrease in Ca(2+) mobilization, PKC (protein kinase C) signalling and alpha-granule secretion, as well as to a complete lack of dense granule secretion. Interestingly, subthreshold PAR4 activation rapidly abrogated PAR1 signalling desensitization by differentially reconstituting these affected signalling events and functional responses, which was sufficient to re-establish aggregation. The lack of ADP release and P2Y(12) receptor-induced G(alpha i) signalling accounted for the loss of the aggregation response, as mimicking G(alpha i/z) signalling with 2-MeS-ADP (2-methylthioadenosine-5-O-diphosphate) or epinephrine (adrenaline) could substitute for intermediate PAR4 activation. Finally, we found that the re-sensitization of PAR1 signalling-induced aggregation via PAR4 relied on PKC-mediated release of both ADP from dense granules and fibrinogen from alpha-granules. The present study elucidates further differences in human platelet PAR signalling regulation and provides evidence for a cross-talk in which PAR4 signalling counteracts mechanisms involved in PAR1 signalling down-regulation.

Blood cells are continuously flowing in our systems maintaining haemostasis in the arteries and veins. If a vessel is damaged, the smallest cell fragments in the blood (platelets) are directed to cover the wound and plug the leakage to prevent blood loss. Most of the time platelets stop the blood leak without any difficulties. During other, pathological, circumstances, platelets continue to form a thrombus, preventing the blood flow and may cause myocardial infarction or stroke.

Thrombin is the most potent platelet agonist and is a product created in the coagulation cascade. This thesis is focused on the interactions between the two platelet thrombin receptors; protease activated receptors 1 (PAR1) and PAR4 in vitro. We have investigated potential differences between these receptors in several situations associated with cardiovascular disease.

First we studied interactions between PAR1 and PAR4 and the oral pathogen Porphyromonas gingivalis (which secretes enzymes, gingipains, with properties similar to thrombin). Here we showed that P. gingivalis is signaling mainly, but not exclusively, via PAR4. Our second study showed that the cross-talk between the stress hormone epinephrine and thrombin occur exclusively through PAR4 if the key-substance ATP is present and cyclooxygenase-1 inhibited by aspirin. The third study investigated platelet secretion, with focus on the protein plasminogen activator inhibitor 1(PAI-1), an inhibitor of the fibrinolytic process responsible for dissolving a formed clot. Here we showed that PAI-1 secretion and synthesis was more sensitive to stimulation through PAR1 than PAR4. Finally this thesis describes differences between PAR1 and PAR4 in cell-signaling pathways regulating the stability of a platelet aggregate, where PAR4 seems to be of importance to create stable platelet aggregates and that this stability is dependent on ADP activation via P2Y12 and cell signaling via PI3-kinase.

Until now, PAR1 has been considered to be the most important thrombin receptor, due to its high affinity for thrombin. However, there must be a reason why platelets express two different thrombin receptors. This thesis highlights several situations where PAR4 plays a complementary and important role in platelet signaling and haemostasis.

In conclusion, this thesis suggests that PAR4 plays a major role in calcium signaling and the induction of sustained aggregation, while PAR1 shows a more prominent role in platelet secretion and synthesis. This thesis also reveals new interactions between platelet thrombin receptors and the ADP-, ATP- and epinephrine receptors. The results described in this thesis contribute to an increased knowledge of the platelet thrombin receptors and their interplay in situations such as infection, stress, fibrinolysis, and platelet aggregation.

Many blood cell mechanisms in the human body are working all the time to maintain haemostasis in the blood vessels. Once a wound arises platelets are alerted via different substances to cover the wound and prevent loss of blood. Most of the times these mechanisms do stop the blood, and further heal the wound. During other circumstances the platelet-covering continues to form a thrombus, preventing the blood to flow and instead causes myocardial infarction or stroke. There are several risk factors triggering development of circulatory diseases such as obesity, lack of exercise, smoking, infection and stress.

This thesis describes the interaction between the two platelet thrombin receptors PAR1 and PAR4, together with the interaction of the oral pathogen Porphyromonas gingivalis (with thrombin-like gingipains), and the cross talk with the stress hormone epinephrine and its α_2A adrenergic receptor. Until now PAR1 is thought to be the most important thrombin receptor due to its high affinity for thrombin. From a phylogenetical and patophysiological point of view there must be a reason why platelets express two different thrombin receptors. Today PAR4 is considered less important, but this thesis implies that PAR4 plays an important role in platelet signaling and haemostasis.

The results show that bacteria pre-stimulated platelets, followed by epinephrine gives a strong and full aggregation and calcium mobilization, in both aspirinated and non-aspirinated human platelets. The amount of bacteria does not itself, or epinephrine alone give aggregation or calcium mobilization. This mechanism is dependent on both Rgp type gingipain released from P. gingivalis, and PARs in an interaction with the α_2A adrenergic receptor.

Further, results reveal that PAR4 interacts and cross talks with the platelet α_2A-adrenergic receptor in aspirinated platelets. Neither of the two platelet purinergic P2Y-receptors (P2Y₁₂ and P2Y₁) contribute to this action, but the purinergic P2X₁ does. In aggregation studies a low dose of PAR4 activating peptide (AP), but not PAR1-AP, followed by epinephrine results in a strong aggregation and in a calcium mobilization. ATP secretion measurements did reveal that ATP was released during epinephrine stimulation, which indicate that ATP and P2X₁ have a key role in this event. By blocking P2X₁ both aggregation and calcium mobilization were abolished, but not by blocking P2Y₁₂ and P2Y₁. Inhibition of PI3-kinase, both epinephrine-induced calcium mobilization and aggregation were significant reduced. In non-aspirinated platelets PAR1 synergizes with the α_2A adrenergic receptor and P2X₁.

In conclusion, this thesis suggests that PAR4 plays an intriguing and important role in platelets with inactived cyclooxygenase 1.  The results described in this thesis contribute to an increased knowledge of the platelet thrombin receptors.

Human platelets express protease-activated receptor 1 (PAR1) and PAR4 but limited data indicate for differences in signal transduction. We studied the involvement of PAR1 and PAR4 in the cross-talk between thrombin and epinephrine. The results show that epinephrine acted via alpha(2A)-adrenergic receptors to provoke aggregation, secretion, and Ca⁽²⁺⁾ mobilization in aspirin-treated platelets pre-stimulated with subthreshold concentrations of thrombin. Incubating platelets with antibodies against PAR4 or the PAR4-specific inhibitor pepducin P4pal-i1 abolished the aggregation. Furthermore, platelets pre-exposed to the PAR4-activating peptide AYPGKF, but not to the PAR1-activating peptide SFLLRN, were aggregated by epinephrine, whereas both AYPGKF and SFLLRN synergized with epinephrine in the absence of aspirin. The roles of released ATP and ADP were elucidated by using antagonists of the purinergic receptors P2X(1), P2Y(1), and P2Y(12) (i.e. NF449, MRS2159, MRS2179, and cangrelor). Intriguingly, ATP, but not ADP, was required for the epinephrine/thrombin-induced aggregation. In Western blot analysis, a low concentration of AYPGKF, but not SFLLRN, stimulated phosphorylation of Akt on serine 473. Moreover, the phosphatidyl inositide 3-kinase inhibitor LY294002 antagonized the effect of epinephrine combined with thrombin or AYPGKF. Thus, in aspirin-treated platelets, PAR4, but not PAR1, interacts synergistically with alpha(2A)-adrenergic receptors, and the PI3-kinase/Akt pathway is involved in this cross-talk. Furthermore, in PAR4-pretreated platelets, epinephrine caused dense granule secretion, and subsequent signaling from the ATP-gated P2X(1)-receptor and the alpha(2A)-adrenergic receptor induced aggregation. These results suggest a new mechanism that has ATP as a key element and circumvents the action of aspirin on epinephrine-facilitated PAR4-mediated platelet activation.

Recent studies indicate connections between periodontitis and atherothrombosis, and the periodontal pathogen Porphyromonas gingivalis has been found within atherosclerotic lesions. P. gingivalis-derived proteases, designated gingipains activate human platelets, probably through a "thrombin-like" activity on protease-activated receptors (PARs). However, the potential interplay between P. gingivalis and other physiological platelet activators has not been investigated. The aim of this study was to elucidate consequences and mechanisms in the interaction between P. gingivalis and the stress hormone epinephrine. By measuring changes in light transmission through platelet suspensions, we found that P. gingivalis provoked aggregation, whereas epinephrine alone never had any effect. Intriguingly, pre-treatment of platelets with a low, sub-threshold number of P. gingivalis (i.e. a density that did not directly provoke platelet aggregation) resulted in a marked aggregation response when epinephrine was added. This synergistic action was not inhibited by the cyclooxygenas inhibitor aspirin. Furthermore, fura-2-measurements revealed that epinephrine caused an intracellular Ca⁽²⁺⁾ mobilization in P. gingivalis pre-treated platelets, whereas epinephrine alone had no effect. Inhibition of the arg-specific gingipains, but not the lys-specific gingipains, abolished the aggregation and the Ca⁽²⁺⁾ response provoked by epinephrine. Similar results were achieved by separate blockage of platelet alpha(2)-adrenergic receptors and PARs. In conclusion, the present study shows that a sub-threshold number of P. gingivalis sensitizes platelets to epinephrine. We suggest that P. gingivalis-derived arg-specific gingipains activates a small number of PARs on the surface of the platelets. This leads to an unexpected Ca⁽²⁺⁾ mobilization and a marked aggregation response when epinephrine subsequently binds to the alpha(2)-adrenergic receptor. The present results are consistent with a direct connection between periodontitis and stress, and describe a novel mechanism that may contribute to pathological platelet activation.

Thrombin activates human platelets through cleavage of two G-protein-coupled proteaseactivatedreceptors (PARs) denoted PAR1 and PAR4. The aim of this study was to investigatedifferences in PAR1 and PAR4 signaling regarding formation and stability of plateletaggregates. We show that weak PAR1-mediated aggregation is reversible, whereas PAR4-mediated aggregation, weak or strong, is always sustained. PAR1-induced plateletaggregation is decreased and more reversible in the presence of the P2Y12 antagonistcangrelor. However, the effects by cangrelor can be concentration-dependently reversed byconcomitant PAR4 activation in a PI3-kinase-dependent manner. In contrast; in PAR4-APstimulated platelets, aggregation is reduced by cangrelor or inhibition of PI3-kinase byLY294002 but remains irreversible. However, a combined inhibition of PI3-K and P2Y12results in reduced and reversible aggregation. In the light of recently published data on PAR1desensitization, we suggest that the physiological role of the differences between PAR1 andPAR4 activation on aggregate and clot stability could be to fine-tune the response tothrombin. A repeated or continuous very low thrombin generation will desensitize PAR1 andeven if small platelet aggregates are formed they will dissolve, preventing inappropriatethrombus formation. At higher concentrations of thrombin, PAR4 will become activatedabrogating desensitization of PAR1 and enforcing stability of platelet aggregates.