Background

Patients with inflammatory bowel disease have an increased risk of colorectal cancer. There is a scarcity of large studies with a focus on rectal cancer in patients with inflammatory bowel disease. This study aimed to compare survival in resected patients with rectal cancer with and without inflammatory bowel disease.

Methods

This national population-based study used the Colorectal Cancer Data Base. All Swedish patients ≥18 years of age with a diagnosis of stage I–III rectal cancer between 1997 and 2021, surgically treated with curative intent, were included and followed up until 2022. The outcome of interest was recurrence-free survival. Flexible parametric survival models adjusted for time since surgery, year of diagnosis, sex, age at diagnosis, and Charlson Co-morbidity Index were used to estimate proportional and time-dependent hazard ratios of recurrence-free survival with 95% confidence intervals.

Results

Overall, 22 082 patients with rectal cancer were included, among whom 323 (1.5%) had inflammatory bowel disease. Neoadjuvant radiotherapy/chemoradiotherapy was given to 55% and 63% of patients with and without inflammatory bowel disease respectively. The median follow-up time was 5.2 years (interquartile range (i.q.r.) 2.3–10) in patients with inflammatory bowel disease and 5.9 years (i.q.r. 2.9–10) in patients without inflammatory bowel disease. Based on the adjusted proportional hazards model, no overall difference in recurrence-free survival was found (HR 1.05, 95% c.i. 0.87 to 1.26). In the time-dependent adjusted model, patients with rectal cancer with inflammatory bowel disease experienced a lower recurrence-free survival during the first year after surgery (1 year HR 1.36, 95% c.i. 1.06 to 1.73), after which there was no difference in comparison with patients without inflammatory bowel disease (5 years HR 0.77, 95% c.i. 0.56 to 1.06).

Conclusion

Despite lower recurrence-free survival during the first year among those with inflammatory bowel disease, there were no long-term differences between patients with or without inflammatory bowel disease.

Background: Individuals with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) are at increased risk of fracture. It is unclear if this risk varies by recent histological activity.

Aims: To determine the fracture risk in IBD during periods with and without histological inflammation.

Methods: We studied a nationwide cohort of 54,591 individuals diagnosed with IBD in 1990-2016 with longitudinal data on ileo-colorectal biopsies. Fractures were identified by inpatient and hospital-based outpatient diagnoses. We derived Cox regression estimated hazard ratios (HRs) for fracture during 12 months following a histological inflammation (vs. histological remission) record after adjusting for socio-demographics, comorbidities, IBD duration, IBD-related surgery and hospitalization. We adjusted sensitivity analyses for medical IBD treatment including corticosteroids.

Results: Mean age of patients was 44.0 (SD = 18.3) and 45.5 (SD = 17.1) years at biopsy with histological inflammation and remission, respectively. For histological inflammation, there were 1.37 (95% CI 1.29-1.46) fractures per 100 years' follow-up versus 1.31 (95% CI 1.19-1.44) for remission (adjusted [a]HR 1.12; 95% CI 1.00-1.26; p = 0.04). HRs were similar with histological inflammation of Crohn's disease (1.11; 95% CI 0.91-1.36) and ulcerative colitis (1.18; 95% CI 1.02-1.36). Estimates were consistent across age groups. An overall small excess risk of any fracture remained after accounting for corticosteroids. A more prominently raised fracture risk was observed in corticosteroid-naïve IBD patients with histological inflammation versus histological remission (aHR 1.41; 95% CI 1.07-1.85). The aHR of hip fracture following histological inflammation was 1.29 (95% CI 0.87-1.92).

Conclusions: Histological inflammation in IBD predicted a small increase in short-term fracture risk. Measures to reduce disease activity may reduce fracture risk in IBD.

Background: Anastomotic leak rates after colorectal surgery remain high. In most left-sided colon and rectal resection surgeries, a circular stapler is utilized to create the primary bowel anastomosis. However, it remains unclear whether a relationship between circular stapler technology and anastomotic leak in left-sided colorectal surgery exists.

Methods: A post-hoc analysis was conducted using a prospectively collected data set of patients from the 2017 European Society of Coloproctology snapshot audit who underwent elective left-sided resection (left hemicolectomy, sigmoid colectomy, or rectal resection) with a manual circular stapled anastomosis. Rates of anastomotic leak and unplanned intensive care unit stay in association with manual circular stapling were assessed. Patient-, disease-, geographical-, and surgeon-related factors as well as stapler brand were explored using multivariable regression models to identify predictors of adverse outcomes.

Results: Across 3305 procedures, 8.0% of patients had an anastomotic leak and 2.1% had an unplanned intensive care unit stay. Independent predictors of anastomotic leak were male sex, minimal-access surgery converted to open surgery, and anastomosis height C11 (lower third rectum) (all P < 0.050). Independent predictors of unplanned intensive care unit stay were minimal-access surgery converted to open surgery and American Society of Anesthesiologists grade IV (all P < 0.050). Stapler device brand was not a predictor of anastomotic leak or unplanned intensive care unit stay in multivariable regression analysis. There were no differences in rates of anastomotic leak and unplanned intensive care unit stay according to stapler head diameter, geographical region, or surgeon experience.

Conclusion: In patients undergoing left-sided bowel anastomosis, choice of manual circular stapler, in terms of manufacturer or head diameter, is not associated with rates of anastomotic leak and unplanned intensive care unit stay.

Background The aim of this study was to examine the association between appendectomy and advanced colorectal neoplasia (aCRN) in patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). Methods Inflammatory bowel disease patients diagnosed in Denmark in the period 1977 to 2017 were identified from the Danish National Patient Registry. Inflammatory bowel disease patients who underwent appendectomy were matched with up to 10 IBD patients without appendectomy and followed until aCRN, death, or emigration. Absolute risks of aCRN were calculated, treating death and bowel resections as competing risks. Stratified Cox regression was used to calculate adjusted hazard ratios (aHRs) of aCRN, comparing IBD patients with appendectomy to IBD patients without appendectomy. Results We identified 3789 IBD patients with appendectomy and 37 676 IBD patients without appendectomy. A total of 573 patients (1.4%) developed aCRN, with an absolute risk of aCRN at 20 years of 4.9% (95% confidence interval [CI], 2.9%-7.7%) for ulcerative colitis (UC) patients with appendectomy after UC diagnosis compared with 2.8% (95% CI, 2.3%-3.3%) for UC patients without appendectomy. Appendectomy after UC was associated with an increased rate of aCRN 5 to 10 years (aHR, 2.5; 95% CI, 1.1-5.5) and 10 to 20 years after appendectomy (aHR, 2.3; 95% CI, 1.0-5.5). Appendectomy prior to UC diagnosis was not associated with an increased rate of aCRN, and Crohns disease was not associated with the rate of aCRN, regardless of timing or histological diagnosis of the appendix specimen. Conclusions Although appendectomy may have a positive effect on the clinical course of UC, our study suggests that this may come at the expense of a higher risk of aCRN.

Introduction: We aimed to assess the risk of serious infection in patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) treated with vedolizumab compared with those treated with anti-tumor necrosis factors (TNF) and the general population.

Methods: In this Swedish cohort study, treatment episodes were identified from nationwide health registers. We used Cox regression with propensity score-matched cohorts to estimate hazard ratios (HRs) for incident serious infections, defined as infections requiring hospital admission.

Results: During 1,376 treatment episodes in Crohn's disease, the rate of serious infections per 100 person-years (PY) was 5.18 (95% CI = 3.98-6.63) with vedolizumab vs 3.54 (95% CI = 2.50-4.85) with anti-TNF; HR = 1.72 (95% CI = 1.12-2.65), partly explained by more gastrointestinal infections. Compared with the rate of 0.75/100 PY (95% CI = 0.59-0.92) in a matched general population cohort, vedolizumab demonstrated higher risk (HR = 7.00; 95% CI = 5.04-9.72). During 1,294 treatment episodes in ulcerative colitis, the corresponding rates were 3.74/100 PY (95% CI = 2.66-5.11) with vedolizumab vs 3.42/100 PY (95% CI = 2.31-4.89) with anti-TNF; HR = 0.80 (95% CI = 0.47-1.36) during the initial 1.1 years and HR = 2.03 (95% CI = 0.65-6.32) after 1.1 years (truncated due to nonproportional hazards). Pneumonia accounted for 40% of all infections among anti-TNF, whereas no case was observed among vedolizumab episodes. Compared with the rate of 0.69/100 PYs (95% CI = 0.53-0.87) in a matched general population cohort, vedolizumab showed an HR of 5.45 (95% CI = 3.67-8.11).

Discussion: Vedolizumab was associated with increased risks of serious infections compared with anti-TNF in Crohn's disease but not in ulcerative colitis. Nonetheless, the panorama of serious infections seemed to differ between the drugs. Our findings underscore the importance of clinical awareness of infections and the safety profile of the 2 therapies.

n/a

This article is the second in a series of two publications on the European Crohn's and Colitis Organisation [ECCO] evidence-based consensus on the management of Crohn's disease. The first article covers medical management; the present article addresses surgical management, including preoperative aspects and drug management before surgery. It also provides technical advice for a variety of common clinical situations. Both articles together represent the evidence-based recommendations of the ECCO for Crohn's disease and an update of prior ECCO Guidelines.

Background & aims: Individuals with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) are at increased risk of serious infections, but whether this risk varies by histologic disease activity is unclear.

Methods: This was a national population-based study of 55,626 individuals diagnosed with IBD in 1990 to 2016 with longitudinal data on ileocolorectal biopsy specimens followed up through 2016. Serious infections were defined as having an inpatient infectious disease diagnosis in the Swedish National Patient Register. We used Cox regression to estimate hazard ratios (HRs) for serious infections in the 12 months after documentation of histologic inflammation (vs histologic remission), adjusting for social and demographic factors, chronic comorbidities, prior IBD-related surgery, and hospitalization. We also adjusted for IBD-related medications in sensitivity analyses.

Results: With histologic inflammation vs remission, there was 4.62 (95% CI, 4.46-4.78) and 2.53 (95% CI, 2.36-2.70) serious infections per 100 person-years of follow-up, respectively (adjusted HR [aHR], 1.59; 95% CI, 1.48-1.72). Histologic inflammation (vs remission) was associated with an increased risk of serious infections in ulcerative colitis (aHR, 1.68; 95% CI, 1.51-1.87) and Crohn's disease (aHR, 1.59; 95% CI, 1.40-1.80). The aHRs of sepsis and opportunistic infections were 1.66 (95% CI, 1.28-2.15) and 1.71 (95% CI, 1.22-2.41), respectively. Overall, results were consistent across age groups, sex, and education level, and remained largely unchanged after adjustment for IBD-related medications (aHR, 1.47; 95% CI, 1.34-1.61).

Conclusions: Histologic inflammation of IBD was an independent risk factor of serious infections, including sepsis, suggesting that achieving histologic remission may reduce infections in IBD. The study was approved by the Stockholm Ethics Review Board (approval numbers 2014/1287-31/4, 2018/972-32, and 2021-06209-01).

Background: Primary Sclerosing Cholangitis (PSC) is a hepatobiliary disease closely related to ulcerative colitis (UC). In PSC patients, colectomy has been linked to improved prognosis, especially following liver transplantation. This suggests an involvement of the gut-liver axis in PSC etiology.

Objective: We aimed to investigate the association between colectomy and the risk of future PSC in an epidemiological setting.

Method: Through nationwide registers, we identified all adults diagnosed with UC in Sweden 1990-2018 and retrieved information on PSC diagnosis and colectomy. Within the UC cohort (n = 61,993 patients), we matched 5577 patients with colectomy to 15,078 without colectomy. Matching criteria were sex, age at UC onset (±5 years), year of UC onset (±3 years), and proctitis at the time of colectomy. Incidence rates of PSC per 1000-person year were calculated, and the Cox proportional hazard regression model estimated hazard ratios (HRs) for PSC until 31 December 2019.

Results: During the follow-up, 190 (3.4%) colectomized UC patients and 450 (3.0%) UC comparators developed PSC, yielding incidence rates of 2.6 and 2.4 per 1000 person-years (HR 1.07 [95% CI 0.90-1.28]). The cumulative incidence of colectomy decreased remarkably over calendar periods, but the cumulative incidence of PSC remained unchanged. The risk of developing PSC in colectomized versus comparators changed over time (HR 0.68 [95% CI; 0.48-0.96] in 1990-97 and HR 2.10 [95% CI; 1.37-3.24] in 2011-18).

Conclusions: In UC patients, colectomy was not associated with a decreased risk of subsequent PSC. The observed differences in the risk of PSC development over calendar periods are likely due to changes in PSC-diagnosis and UC-treatment.