Open this publication in new window or tab >>2016 (English)In: Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on Information Systems for Crisis Response and Management / [ed] Andrea H. Tapia, Pedro Antunes, Victor A. Bañuls, Kathleen Moore and João Porto de Albuquerque, ISCRAM , 2016Conference paper, Published paper (Refereed)
Abstract [en]
This paper presents preliminary analysis from a validation study of a novel emergency medicine command and control training and evaluation simulator: DIGEMERGO®. The simulated emergency scenario was a surge capacity event at a generic emergency department, in which the participants took on a management role as the emergency department’s coordinating head nurse. A between group validation design with medical expert and novice participants was used. Initial analysis examined three triage measures associated with surge capacity management performance: time to triage, amount of patients triaged, and triage accuracy. The results show that experts were significantly more accurate at triaging in-hospital patients, but not incoming trauma patients. No significant differences in time or number of patients triaged was found. These initial results partially indicate simulator validity, but trauma patient triage accuracy suffered from a confounding variable in the triage system used. Analysis of additional measures is undergoing to further investigate validity claims.
Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
ISCRAM, 2016
Series
Proceedings of the International ISCRAM Conference, ISSN 2411-3387 ; 2016
Keywords
Simulator validation, between group analysis, command and control, performance measures, emergency medicine, surge capacity
National Category
Computer Systems
Identifiers
urn:nbn:se:liu:diva-128700 (URN)9788460879848 (ISBN)
Conference
The 13th International Conference on Information Systems for Crisis Response and Management, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, May 22-25, 2016
2016-05-302016-05-302018-03-20Bibliographically approved