Introduction:

The Covid-19 pandemic strained most of the world’s health care organizations to, and sometimes beyond, their limits. To anticipate, coordinate, mobilize, and prioritize hospital resources, Sweden’s health care regions established regional medical command and control teams according to the medical major incident structure. This command structure was initially developed based on an all-hazards approach focused primarily on sudden mass casualty incidents with a relatively short time frame. Covid-19 management was active for several months with a most intense operations period during the spring of 2020. This study aimed at identifying competence needs by employing a co-creative approach with members of the staff involved in the pandemic management.

Method:

Data was collected and analyzed using a modified Delphi consensus method. The respondents were subject matter experts serving in the regional medical command and control teams during the COVID-19 pandemic. One workshop was held to gather opinions, which were included as statements in a consensus survey and answered by the participants after the first workshop. A second workshop was held to discuss statements that did not reach initial consensus in the survey and establish final consensus.

Results:

The consensus agreed statements were sorted into five themes, which constituted the collective agreement of medical command and control core abilities. The five core competence themes were: Situation report, Team organization, Co-operation, Competence management, and Analysis. The consensus agreed statements highlighted competencies needed for creating situation reports, organizing medical command and control teams, effective cross-organization co-operation, decision-making, and medical intelligence analysis.

Conclusion:

The core competencies of medical command and control identified in the present study can be used to further affirm current learning objectives and to formulate future learning objectives for education and exercises. The evaluation approach could potentially be used as a post-incident review to fine-tune an organization’s training plan.

This paper presents an ethnographic study consisting of non-participatory observations of a Swedish regional medical command and control team during their crisis response to the COVID-19 pandemic. The field-notes from the observations were analyzed using a deductive content analysis with categories representing teamwork processes. The content analysis showed that the studied regional medical command and control team was engaged in all but one of the predefined teamwork processes. Furthermore, the content analysis also added to the understanding of the regional medical command and control teamÂ’s work procedures by emphasizing how the team was engaged in the different processes. Lastly, the content analysis also made it possible to identify potential developmental needs of the studied regional medical command and control team.

Objective The purpose of this study was to compare laypeoples and professional first responders ability to perform tourniquet application and cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) during calm and stressful circumstances. Background Life-threatening bleeding is a major cause of death that could be prevented by fast and appropriate first aid interventions. Therefore, laypeople are now being trained in bleeding control skills, transforming them from bystanders to immediate responders. However, critics have questioned whether laypeople are able to perform during more stressful conditions. Method Twenty-four laypersons and 31 professional first responders were tested in two conditions: a calm classroom scenario and a stressful scenario consisting of paintball fire and physical exertion. Stress and workload were assessed along with task performance. Results The experimental manipulation was successful in terms of eliciting stress reactions. Tourniquet application performance did not decline in the stressful condition, but some aspects of CPR performance did for both groups. First responders experienced higher task engagement and lower distress, worry and workload than the laypeople in both the calm and stressful conditions. Conclusion Stress did not affect first responders and laypeople differently in terms of performance effects. Stress should therefore not be considered a major obstacle for teaching bleeding control skills to laypeople. Application Tourniquet application can be taught to laypeople in a short amount of time, and they can perform this skill during stress in controlled settings. Concerns about laypeoples ability to perform under stress should not exclude bleeding control skills from first aid courses for civilian laypeople.

Introduction

Hemorrhage control initiated by laypeople, or immediate responders, can be a crucial link for increased survival among victims with hemorrhage. An increased interest in hemorrhage control training for laypeople have resulted in numerous publications in the area, showing that training laypeople in hemorrhage control can be successful (Nichols & Horstman, 2022; Tang et al., 2022). To this date, it is unknown which training factors are associated with successful training outcomes and to what extent. The objective of this study is to review and analyze past and present literature on hemorrhage control training for laypeople, in order to highlight current knowledge gaps, and direct future research.

Method

A systematic literature review was performed by reviewing and analyzing the literature. Five electronic databases, CINAHL, Embase, PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science, were used in the literature search. Search keywords were chosen among the variations and synonyms to the words: “laypeople” AND “hemorrhage” AND “training” AND “stop the bleed”. To examine where the knowledge gaps exist in terms of training effectiveness, a theoretical model by Cannon-Bowers et al. (1995) was chosen as theoretical lens, and each record was categorized into six training outcome categories: reactions, attitude change, learning, training performance, job performance, and results/organizational effectiveness, according to the content of the reviewed studies.

Preliminary results

In total, 2962 records were initially identified for screening, and 1186 records were kept after duplicate removal and deletion of incomplete records. After title and abstract review, 186 records were sought for retrieval. This will be further reduced into a fewer number of records for full text review after additional screening. By categorizing the records into the six training outcome categories, previous research efforts can be highlighted, as well as it creates an opportunity for future research suggestions.

Conclusion

By equipping the public with the necessary knowledge and tools for hemorrhage control, lives can be saved. By examining the literature on hemorrhage control training effectiveness, suggestions for future research and educational practice can be made.

Introduction

Hemorrhage control initiated by laypeople, or immediate responders, can be a crucial link for increased survival among victims with hemorrhage. An increased interest in hemorrhage control training for laypeople have resulted in numerous publications in the area, showing that training laypeople in hemorrhage control can be successful (Nichols & Horstman, 2022; Tang et al., 2022). To this date, it is unknown which training factors are associated with successful training outcomes and to what extent. The objective of this study is to review and analyze past and present literature on hemorrhage control training for laypeople, in order to highlight current knowledge gaps, and direct future research.

Method

A systematic literature review was performed by reviewing and analyzing the literature. Five electronic databases, CINAHL, Embase, PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science, were used in the literature search. Search keywords were chosen among the variations and synonyms to the words: “laypeople” AND “hemorrhage” AND “training” AND “stop the bleed”. To examine where the knowledge gaps exist in terms of training effectiveness, a theoretical model by Cannon-Bowers et al. (1995) was chosen as theoretical lens, and each record was categorized into six training outcome categories: reactions, attitude change, learning, training performance, job performance, and results/organizational effectiveness, according to the content of the reviewed studies.

Preliminary results

In total, 2962 records were initially identified for screening, and 1186 records were kept after duplicate removal and deletion of incomplete records. After title and abstract review, 186 records were sought for retrieval. This will be further reduced into a fewer number of records for full text review after additional screening. By categorizing the records into the six training outcome categories, previous research efforts can be highlighted, as well as it creates an opportunity for future research suggestions.

Conclusion

By equipping the public with the necessary knowledge and tools for hemorrhage control, lives can be saved. By examining the literature on hemorrhage control training effectiveness, suggestions for future research and educational practice can be made.